U.S. Force Not Ruled Out In Pakistan

July 22nd, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

d;lvm

Well, given that it is, and has been for some time, absolutely necessary, when the fuck is it going to start? Townsend has said, “We can’t go in until we know where they are.” Well how in the hell are you going to know where they are unless you go in and find them? The administration is out of excuses for letting the current Pakistan policy continue. The lessons of the war on terror are clear: a lack of aggression, not the use of aggression, always sets us back. And let us not forget that in terms of available forces, the fact that the rest of the world’s cowards ( like France ) expect us to fight the war on Jihad for them, is the primary reason for any manpower deficiencies. Europe is not only a planetary cancer of socialism and anti-Westernism ( just why is every cultute sacrosanct to Europeans, except Western culture?), it is a leech of U.S. power: they don’t fight because they know we will do it for them. Had Europe done its duty and gone into Iraq with us, the state of the region, and the prognosis for the extermination of Islamist Fascist Imperialism, would both be in much better stead.


Jul 22 11:35 AM US/Eastern
By HOPE YEN
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. would consider military force if necessary to stem al-Qaida’s growing ability to use its hideout in Pakistan to launch terrorist attacks, a White House aide said Sunday.

The president’s homeland security adviser, Fran Townsend, said the U.S. was committed first and foremost to working with Pakistan’s president, Pervez Musharraf, in his efforts to control militants in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region. But she indicated the U.S. was ready to take additional measures.

“Just because we don’t speak about things publicly doesn’t mean we’re not doing things you talk about,” Townsend said, when asked in a broadcast interview why the U.S. does not conduct special operations and other measures to cripple al-Qaida.

“Job No. 1 is to protect the American people. There are no options off the table,” she said.

Responding to earlier comments by Townsend, Pakistan’s foreign minister, Khurshid Kasuri, said Sunday that the country’s military was in the best position to attack al-Qaida, if the U.S. provided intelligence.

The national intelligence director, Mike McConnell, said he believed that Osama bin Laden was living in the tribal, border region of Pakistan. Bin Laden is the leader of the al-Qaida network and mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks.

McConnell said Musharraf’s attempt at a political solution to peace in the region had backfired by giving al-Qaida a place and time to regroup.

“Al-Qaida has been able to regain some of its momentum,” McConnell said. “The leadership’s intact. They have operational planners, and they have safe haven. The thing they’re missing are operatives inside the United States.”

In the National Intelligence Estimate released last week, analysts stressed the importance of al-Qaida’s increasingly comfortable hideout in Pakistan that has resulted from a hands-off accord between Musharraf and tribal leaders along the Afghan border.

That 10-month-old deal, which has unraveled in recent days, gave al- Qaida new opportunities to set up compounds for terror training, improve its international communications with associates and bolster its operations.

Since then, U.S. officials have said they expect Pakistan to launch more military strikes on Islamic militants while the Bush administration pumps hundreds of millions of dollars in development aid into lawless tribal regions to fight extremism.

On Sunday, Townsend reiterated the importance of Musharraf’s efforts.

“We should also be clear that we believe Pakistan has been a very good ally in the war on terrorism,” she said. “Musharraf has been the subject of numerous assassination attempts. Al-Qaida’s trying to kill him. They get what the problem is. And we’re working with them to deny al-Qaida and the Taliban the safe haven.”

McConnell also sought to bolster the leader of Pakistan, a key U.S. partner in its fight against terrorism. “President Musharraf is one of our strongest allies,” McConnell said.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he agreed with Townsend that the U.S. should consider going after al-Qaida militarily “wherever they are.”

“We have the NIE report, which just came out, that says al-Qaida during this administration is stronger than ever. I don’t think we should take anything off the table. Wherever we find these evil people we should go get them,” Reid said.

But Kasuri said Pakistan was ready to act on any intelligence from the U.S.

“Let the United States provide us with actionable intelligence and you will find that Pakistan will never be lacking,” he said. “Pakistan’s army can do the job much better and the result will be that there will be far less collateral damage.”

Townsend spoke on “Fox News Sunday” and “Late Edition” on CNN. McConnell appeared on “Meet the Press” on NBC. Reid was on “Face the Nation” on CBS. Kasuri was on CNN.


8 Responses

  1. Dan (The Infidel)

    “Responding to earlier comments by Townsend, Pakistan’s foreign minister, Khurshid Kasuri, said Sunday that the country’s military was in the best position to attack al-Qaida, if the U.S. provided intelligence.”

    Oh please, what a croc. The only people who know more about where AQ and the Taliban are hiding(with the possible exception of Newsweek!!!) is the fucking ISI.

    That’s bullshit.

  2. CW4, EN

    “…Kasuri said Pakistan was ready to act on any intelligence from the U.S.

    “Let the United States provide us with actionable intelligence and you will find that Pakistan will never be lacking,” he said. “Pakistan’s army can do the job much better and the result will be that there will be far less collateral damage.””

    The problem is that “actionable intel” takes work by people on the ground, and we have few in that position. The Pak Army is OK, but they have a lot of internal strife.

    I find the comments from the Senator from Nevada to be absolute theatre. He is not commited to winning this war. Not in Pakistan. Not in Afghanistan. Not in Iraq. Not anywhere.

    Maybe the good people of Nevada will end their embarrassment and elect the former prositute who ran last time. At least she has a track record of selling herself and her services that she does not have to hide.

  3. LftBhndAgn

    Why does this piss me of so much? Uncle Mushy is wiling to sign his own death certificate with the Taliban but WE should go in to clean out the safe havens in Pakistan?

    Give me a fucking break. Sorry all - but something smells rotten here.

  4. Dan (The Infidel)

    Last I checked the Senator from Nevada’s poll numbers were…much like his masculinity…absolutely anemic. At this rate, I wouldn’t bet on his horse in the next race.
    He’s looking at a Tom Daschle-like exit from political life.

    What’s annoying is he keeps saying and doing the same stupid shit, thinking that he speaks for his constituents.
    What a fucking idiot he is.

    “Maybe the good people of Nevada will end their embarrassment and elect the former prositute who ran last time. At least she has a track record of selling herself and her services that she does not have to hide.”

    Good line CW4. Outstanding…

  5. Kurt (the infidel)

    Yeah this whole situation seems foul to me..I’m wondering will Pakistan do anything in the tribal areas or just hide these assholes even deeper in the cave. From the outside it looks like Musharraf is an ally, but i think he is always walking a tight rope, telling us what we want to hear and then doing the same to his people. these 2 seem to cance themselves out, I hope he decides to act or let us at least get some special forces in to direct the bombers and gunships

  6. Kurt (the infidel)

    these 2 things seem to cancel themselves out*..a little typo there

  7. Max

    All I want to know is, why is this (along with the Fourth Rail and a few other blogs) one of the few places that I can find real news? Even Fox News is so boring I hardly ever visit their website anymore. All they seem to want to talk about is Lindsey Lohan and company.

    Thanks, Pat, for being there. I visit here almost every day.

  8. danielle

    Gee I thought the Pakistani president swore to go all harsh on al-Q. Maybe they ought to allow the troops to go in now.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: