Al Qaeda Pumping Fighters Into Iraq Ahead Of September Report

WASHINGTON: A US Commander in Iraq said Wednesday al-Qaeda leadership in Iraq bolstered its foreign fighter facilitation network in recent weeks ahead of September’s Washington deadline to evaluate US troops surge in Iraq. “We have seen in the last six weeks indications that al-Qaeda has actually sent more people into Iraq to try to shore up the al-Qaeda network in Iraq,” said Deputy Chief of Staff for Strategic Effects in the Multinational Force in Iraq Brigadier General Kevin Bergner. Speaking via teleconference from Iraq with bloggers in a Pentagon round table, Bergner talked about “some tactical momentum achieved” in the month of July and the first week of August where coalition forces captured or killed around 18 senior al-Qaeda leaders in July including the most senior Iraqi national in al-Qaeda leadership in Iraq Khaled al-Mashhadani.
The US Commander referred as well to what happened last Sunday in Abu Hanifa Mosque in Baghdad last Sunday as local citizens helped the Iraqi army capture terrorists who sought sanctuary in the Mosque and the result was finding “a large weapons cache” in its backyard. “We know that al-Qaeda still has the ability to conduct these barbaric spectacular attacks,” noting that the US military will “keep the pressure on every aspect of the al-Qaeda operations and their affiliates.” Bergner said that al-Qaeda leaders “are not able to maintain the same coherence in their command and control and their planning and direction of operations.” “They spend more of their time having to regenerate and re-establish the leadership connections,” he added. “We continue to mount operations against extremist militias frequently supported by Iran’s Qods Force,” said Bergner noting that the military operation by the coalition forces earlier today in Sadr City Eastern Baghdad was completed, killing 30 militants and detaining 12 others. The US Commander said “there is a steady development at local level as security improves” crediting the surge for that matter and admitting “it is still a hard fight.”
Meeting
Iraq’s deputy foreign minister urged his country’s neighbors Wednesday for genuine support and said he hoped a meeting here on Iraq’s deteriorating security would produce real results instead of broken promises. But key regional power player Saudi Arabia was absent from the first meeting of the newly created Security Committee for Coordination and Cooperation on Iraq. A US delegation, headed by Washington’s top diplomat in Syria, Charge d’Affaires Michael Corbin, attended the two-day meeting, as well as representatives of Iraq’s other neighbors, including Iran, the Arab League, Bahrain and Egypt and UN Security Council permanent members. But Saudi Arabia’s decision not to participate cast doubt on how effective the meeting would be. Its absence was likely due to its bad relations with the Syrian government. Saudi officials would not comment, but the kingdom and Damascus have been deeply divided over Syria’s ties to Iran and the Shiite Hezbollah militant group in Lebanon.
A Sunni Muslim country, Saudi Arabia also has been keeping Iraq’s Shiite-led government at arms length — but under US pressure to be more cooperative, it is now considering reopening an embassy in Baghdad.
“We hope that this meeting will not be a routine one and will be effective and will come up with effective results that achieve the goal of supporting it in its current dilemma,” Iraq’s Deputy Foreign Minister Labid Abbawi said Wednesday.
“Iraq expects real and genuine support in passing through this dilemma and suffering of terrorism and violence,” he added.
British Embassy official Irfan Siddiq said no specific “demands” were put on the table the meeting but expressed hope it would end with “positive and tangible results, not just talk.” He ruled out any Britain-Syria bilateral meetings on the meeting’s sidelines.
Iraq and its neighbors have held a series of meetings in recent years in which Baghdad has repeatedly urged them to help increase cooperation to prevent foreign fighter infiltration, end violence and restore stability to the war-torn country, while the Sunni Arab nations have pushed the Shiite government to reconcile with Iraq’s Sunni Arab minority. The commission was created in an attempt to step up security cooperation, which so far has seen little progress despite Arab promises.
Hesham Youssef, the Arab League’s representative at the meeting, repeated Arab demands that Iraqis reconcile among themselves if the country wants peace and security.
“The Arab League believes that national conciliation in Iraq is key to solve Iraq’s problems and maintains its unity and achieve stability,” he said. “Shortcomings that have blocked the building of armed and security forces on professional bases should be dealt with.”
Youssef described the atmosphere after the first session as “positive.”
Syria’s interior minister said his country has tightened measures on its border with Iraq to prevent foreign fighters from crossing into its eastern neighbor.
The US has repeatedly accused Syria of allowing foreign fighters to cross its border into Iraq to join anti-American insurgents. Syria denies the charges saying it is impossible to control the long desert border.
Killed
US-led forces swooped into the Shiite militia stronghold of Sadr City on Wednesday, killing 32 suspected militants and detaining 12 others in fighting and an airstrike targeting alleged smuggling networks from Iran. Iraqi police and witnesses said nine civilians were killed in the attack, which occurred hours before Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki arrived in Tehran for his second visit in less than a year. Iraq, which like Iran is majority Shiite, has managed a difficult balancing act between Tehran and Washington since the US-led invasion in 2003, trying to maintain good relations with its powerful neighbor while not angering the Americans. Iraqi authorities, meanwhile, clamped a three-day driving ban on the capital and erected new checkpoints as thousands of Shiite pilgrims began their annual trek toward a mosque in northern Baghdad to mark the anniversary of the death of one of Shiite Islam’s key saints. The military said the raid targeted fighters from breakaway factions of radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr’s Mahdi Army who smuggle arms from Iran and facilitate the travel of Iraqi militants to Iran for training.
“The individuals detained and the terrorists killed during the raid are believed to be members of a cell of a special groups terrorist network known for facilitating the transport of weapons and explosively formed penetrators, or EFPs, from Iran to Iraq, as well as bringing militants from Iraq into Iran for terrorist training,” the military said. The statement said the main suspect in the raid was a liaison between Iraqi fighters and Iran’s elite Quds Force, which is accused of arming and training the militants. Tehran has denied allegations that it is supporting the violence in Iraq. The military account of the raid said US and Iraqi ground forces came under sporadic small-arms fire as they targeted a group of buildings in Sadr City, the sprawling Shiite district in eastern Baghdad. The raiders killed two armed men believed to be lookouts, then detained 12 rogue militia fighters, the military said.
Attack helicopters and warplanes then struck after spotting a vehicle and a large group of armed men on foot who were trying to attack the ground forces. An estimated 30 militants were killed in the air attack, according to the statement. The statement was issued after Iraqi police and witnesses in Sadr City said a bombardment by US helicopters and armored vehicles killed nine civilians, including two women, and wounded six others. The police officer and witnesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they feared reprisals, also said 12 people were detained. Men and young boys wept over wooden coffins covered with blankets before they were placed atop vehicles, while women shrouded in black blamed the Americans for attacking civilians. It was one of the largest in a series of strikes against rogue Shiite militias, which US commanders have said are responsible for an increasing number of attacks against American forces.



Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Hmm, you’d think the liberal left was directing al-Qaeda. The move appears so much like a Democratic political strategy, one can’t help but to wonder.
Make no mistakes - America’s real enemies will use this al-Qaeda “surge” to undermine our own security for political gain.
August 9th, 2007 at 3:29 amIsn’t this a perfect example of why timelines won’t work?1?!
August 9th, 2007 at 5:47 amAQ can keep bringing the fighters to Iraq, but the military has the upper hand at this point and I don’t think it’s going back the other way. With local support and intelligence, AQ is still on the run no matter how many bodies they bring in their own form of a surge. They are disorganized, doing a lot of talking, and wondering who they can really trust. And that’s a good thing.
August 9th, 2007 at 6:23 amMay the surge continue.
The terrorists have CNN too, baby! I fully believe they adapt their play book after Larry, Wolf and Anderson do their things spreading the leftist slanted gospel. None of these jihadi azzhats have a clue regarding the “western mind”… they study our TV and movies and think that is America. Unfortunately, the pigish, know-it-all, bunch of demanding brat children we call our citizens demand that CNN, MSNBC, FOX etc… give us information to feel we know what our government is “up to” at 5, 6 and 10… with weather every 15 or full on 24/7. However, it is just enough information to be dangerous.
I do believe in good journalism. I do belive in free speech. I do not, however, believe in showing the terrorists our friggin game plan because some political whore wants the public opinion to change. That’s why I should grin at nice little vague reports about nothing. I have confidence in our military. I have confidence in our purpose. I have confidence in us.
August 9th, 2007 at 6:49 amExactly JW, timelines will never work. It gives the enemy a date of when we’re leaving and they just have to hold on one day longer than that to claim victory..we need to keep fighting and Keep them guessing..
Oh and for whoever reads this before this time, Bush is holding a news conference at 1030 from the white house, wonder what this is about a day after the US captures and kills like 45 Iranians
August 9th, 2007 at 7:02 am[…] Al Qaeda Pumping Fighters Into Iraq Ahead Of September Report […]
August 9th, 2007 at 8:09 amTime lines…always get people killed, both civilian and military.
It was a ‘Bad Joke’ back in Jan07 - March07 when the Demos in congress were forcing us to have a “public debate” on OUR next war plan(s)…what is now this ’surge’. Who in their right mind would give the enemy your fighting a 4-8 week ‘notice’ of your new plan…including the start time and exactly how many new troops it would involve…and exactly were it would start( Baghdad)?
Who does this?
This got a LOT of people killed in our military as well as a lot of Iraqi citizens.
IN WAR…you do NOT give the other side the ‘heads up’ and tell them almost 100% of your plan before hand. This gives them plenty of time for them to “step up” bombings (which they did). Allows them to take up different defensive positions on you…they can set booobie traps and ambushes, and relocate and move weapons etc…
Still one of the BIGGEST mistakes of this war.
Maybe, the DEMOS will pass a law stating… secret war plans have to be sent to your enemy at least 30 days in advance. God knows we would never want to be ‘political incorrect’ with our “secret war plans’.
________
Peace!
August 9th, 2007 at 8:25 amDan
http://iraqsinconvenienttruth.com/
I’m sure I’m not breaking any new ground and by my saying, I’m sure alkyda is desperately trying to stage something to spring right before the General’s report in September isn’t something they’re not planning for but I just thought I’d say it anyway. Islamofacists to the front of me and defeatocrats to the back of me. Gotta’ have eyes in the back of your head.
August 10th, 2007 at 4:48 amLadyAngler,
August 10th, 2007 at 6:36 pm“Political Whore”! Ooo, I love it when I find out I’m not the only one who thinks like that! But you left out “Media Whore” and Traitor.
that’s a roger…..