-
blogroll
- A Soldier's Perspective
- Ace Of Spades
- American Soldier
- Ann Coulter
- Attack Machine
- Awesome Web Design
- Bane Rants
- Bare Naked Islam
- Bill Ardolino
- Bill Roggio
- Black Five
- Blonde Sagacity
- Breitbart
- Chicagoray
- Confederate Yankee
- Day by Day Cartoon
- Euphoric Reality
- Flopping Aces
- Free Republic
- Frontier Web Design
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ian Schwartz
- Instapundit
- Jules Crittenden
- Little Green Footballs
- Matt Sanchez
- Michael Fumento
- Michael Yon
- Michelle Malkin
- Military.com
- Missiles And Stilletos
- Move America Forward
- MsUnderestimated
- Mudville Gazette
- Pass The Ammo
- Protest Warrior
- Roger L. Simon
- Sportsman's Outfit
- Stop The ACLU
- TCOverride
- The Belmont Club
- The Big God Blog
- The Crimson Blog
- The Daily Gut
- The Drudge Report
- The PoliTicking Timebomb
- The Pundit Review
- Veteran's Affairs Documentary
35 Responses
Respond now.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Shut up Hillary..maybe you’re husband slick willy should have taken that advice, we probably wouldnt be in this shit storm we’re in right now. Treating terrorist attacks like a police matter..Klintoon has no idea about fighting a war
August 21st, 2007 at 6:36 amAnd WTF would the evil one know about that? I realize that she probably wears the dick in her family…but she is at best an impotent, empty suit. She’s great at pointing fingers, but much like her rhetoric, she has absolutely no record to back up her “big talk”.
All righty then…how about a chorus of “I wanna be like Hillary”?
August 21st, 2007 at 6:39 amComrade Billary takes on the persona of Artillary Hillary when she’s in front of military groups.
August 21st, 2007 at 6:47 amBS - The ultimate “victim” is going to lead America to victory? Hell, her thighness can’t even contain Bubba’s bimbos and she would have us believe she is going to come up with a plan to defeat world terrorism?
The ONLY ENEMY her thighness is the least interested in defeating is some mythological vast right wing conspiracy.
And the only surge herself can be bothered with is her ever-widening fat ass.
August 21st, 2007 at 7:27 amI used to think that anybody with common sense could see through such miserable duplicity. But, in contemporary society it seems that 45% of Americans are willing to eat a plate of shit so long as the democrat tells them it’s New York strip steak.
August 21st, 2007 at 7:32 amSuch a master politician, no leadership skills, but damn can she read the tea leaves.
I would rather have someone in office who goes out and gets the tea leaves, brews them, drinks the brew and then gets up to lead.
The Clinton’s are the best of the modern political class, follow the polls and base actions on that.
Do not take any stand that may cause a drop in popularity. Use cohorts in the media to shape public opinion to support whatever you are or are not doing. If something needs to be done, but success is not guaranteed, or you poll and find the masses are not in support, then bypass it, or “kick the can down the road”. They are basing ‘leadership’ in doing what the ‘people want’.
Sounds good, but the ‘people’ you are following are often in the far sides of the political spectrum and are awash in special interests and in the d’rats case, are catered to by the leftist mainstream media and are ’shaping’ the truth to cause a desired opinion.
(remember Goebbels’ quote, “A lie repeated a thousand times becomes a truth,”)
She leads by following. She is a political whore. The shame is she is not alone, she has friends on both sides of the aisle who are bent over in submission to the lust of power for powers sake.
She may well be the next President because the only people that go to the polls are the fringes of both parties, and the d’rats are the best at organizing varieties of special interest groups into the booth; and the rest of America, the common sense, mainstream citizens sit on their ass and bitch about it, but do not take the brief time to educate themselves and actually go vote.
In democracy we do get the government we deserve.
August 21st, 2007 at 7:35 amWe have to start holding signs up at the peace vigils….if Hillary is elected there will be 4 more years of war.
And if Gukliani is elected there will defintely be 4 more yrs of war.
Vote Nader
August 21st, 2007 at 7:37 amWhat a fucking political whore.
I sure hope the GOP is collecting all this shit she’s spewing for their ads. She’s the best thing to come along since Vietnam Kerry.
August 21st, 2007 at 7:54 amAnd the best Hillary secret of all isn’t mentioned here…
Her unfavorable ratings are near equal to her favorability ratings. In all of American political history, NO Politician has ever got elected President with unfavorables in the high 40’s to near 50%.
If history is any guide, and “No Tits Nagursky” were running for President in November 2007, she would lose
August 21st, 2007 at 8:09 ambased on what I just said.
And, if Nader is elected, there will be 4 more years of war. The intensity of the war will be determined by the ability of the various world governments to put a stop to the terrorist nonsense.
Put another way, in countries that have an effective rule of law, terrorist attacks will be less frequent, and will be generally handled as police matters. In lawless regions and where the terrorists are sponsored (that is, paid for) by rogue states, terrorist attacks will be more frequent, and may have to be handled on a war footing.
The US Army right now in Iraq is collecting biodata on people captured during raids. The ultimate purpose of this database is to collect evidence against those who are released. Eventually, that information is destined to support criminal (that is, non-military) convictions. If Iraq is to survive, its institutions must become strong enough to treat acts of terrorism as criminal cases, just as the US did with the Oklahoma city bombing.
August 21st, 2007 at 8:11 amElect Nader and the war is over instantly…we loose and the goat fuckers start butchering.
Jay, you are a fucking moron.
August 21st, 2007 at 8:45 amyeah, jay: i will send Nader money. and jam and valerie, you should pray Nader runs. Go, Ralph, Go, Go, Go (Ralph gets votes from true left wingers). Guess who doesn’t get those votes if he does?
August 21st, 2007 at 9:03 amNadar? He should stick to eating oatmeal and leave the politicking to someone with more balls than he has.
Nader. Now that’s funny…..
August 21st, 2007 at 9:09 amjay is a moron +1
What she is saying is very true. We dropped the ball right after our victory. They should have had better planning. But…
Fuck you Hilary, you don’t know shit about anything outside your liberal agenda and your stinky gaping cooch
August 21st, 2007 at 9:09 amValerie-
Nice comment on the effects of the rule of law.
But what if the countries law is based on is sharia law?
August 21st, 2007 at 9:22 amHillary the chameleon.
August 21st, 2007 at 9:46 amDan: remember when old Perot got Clinton elected by siphoning off 19% of the “independent” vote. You know if he hadn’t run, most if not all those votes would have gone to Bush. Clinton got elected with 43% of the vote, as I recall. At least Nader has a measure of integrity. He sticks to his beliefs, however strange they may be. If he ran as a third party candidate, it would be a great thing. I saaw him promise to run if Billary were the dem candidate.
August 21st, 2007 at 10:14 amlol covering their asses are they. leftist bullshit is everywhere now. i watched the movie shooter the other day and it was full of leftist crap in parts only subtle in their presentation but things that make these nuff nuffs come to conclusions about things.
August 21st, 2007 at 10:30 amlamplighter,
your right on nader, I think he is completely wrong as president, but he his who he is, as with kucinich.
August 21st, 2007 at 11:12 amSo the ticket with the most integrity that the d’rats could nominate would kucinich / nader.
Lamplighter:
If Nader runs that would be a great thing? Great as in what exactly?
Nader is a nice man that should have stuck to consumer issues. Other than that he’s another brain dead dolt.
August 21st, 2007 at 11:25 amLL,
What you’re forgetting is that Jay and retards like him won’t get out of their mom’s basement to vote at all unless Nader runs.
Jay would never vote for anybody as hawkish as Hillary.
August 21st, 2007 at 11:39 amDan: I thought I explained how if Nader was a 3rd party candidate, he’d drain off votes from any Dem party nominee. Get it? Called strategic thinking.
August 21st, 2007 at 12:20 pmOH, and Hillary hawkish? That’s her Artilliary Hillary bit she puts on for military audiences. Then, when she’s at union meetings, she reveals her Comrade Hillary mantle–the one she was in when she wrote her paen to Comrade Aulinksky as her senior thesis in college. The one that causes her to propose socialized medicine and free day care for all. And was the bill she co-sponsored with former KKK Byrd a few months ago for withdrawing the 2003 “war authority” hawkish? Too bad the cold war is over. She and some of her colleagues would be looked at for being “moles.”
August 21st, 2007 at 12:28 pmThe only reason Hillary and the Dem. Party are jumping on board is because they don’t have the balls to try to Defund the war.
They are simply not going to go down that road again.
Soooory, all you Anti-War Protesters.
August 21st, 2007 at 1:09 pmSoooory Hanoi Jane.
Looks like you’re on your own again..HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Hillary is like any Liberal, Socialist, Commie…
What she says only depends on who’s listening at the time and which way the wind is blowing.
Talk about knowing the art of “Tagyiya”…
____
Peace!
August 21st, 2007 at 1:18 pmDan2
http://iraqsinconvenienttruth.com/
Sorry…I forgot…
My Favorite Hillary Clinton “Quote” ~ October 10 2002
QUOTE:
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.
It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.” ~ Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
_________
“”He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members.”"
_________
2002…Al-Qaeda in Iraq?…Tell me its not so Hillary and the rest of you liberal, socialist, commies!
Peace!
August 21st, 2007 at 1:23 pmDan2
Hi again…LOL
Interesting Read:
October 10, 2002
Floor Speech of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton
on S.J. Res. 45, A Resolution to Authorize the Use of
United States Armed Forces Against Iraq.
http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html
______
Peace!
August 21st, 2007 at 1:40 pmDan2
LL:
“I thought I explained how if Nader was a 3rd party candidate, he’d drain off votes from any Dem party nominee. Get it? Called strategic thinking.”
Oh please….all the dumbfucks will be voting for her thighness “No Tits Nagursky”….just to spite the Rebublican nominee.
August 21st, 2007 at 3:06 pmSo, Hillary “NoAnkles” Clinton stands up in front of the VFW and states that the Surge is working. Hmmm…in the rest of the speech, did she mentioned she voted AGAINST the troop funding bill a few months ago?? Anyone hear her mention that?
Steve in NC nailed it on the head about the Clintons. He said, ” Do not take any stand that may cause a drop in popularity ”
That’s exactly what happened with Clinton’s presidencies…he basically did, NOTHING. All he cared about was his popularity rating. And Hillary is the same cat with a different meow. This bitch, this bag of hot air, votes AGAINST the troop funding bill because the polls tell her she will reap the greatest benefit at that time…then months later when opinion is shifting, Americans start to believe we can win this war, she stands up and says the surge is working and she takes her tough stance on not sitting down with leaders from Iran, Syria, etc.
She’s as phony as her husband’s wedding ring. There’s only one thing worse than electing a Democrat to the Presidency. And this electing a Democrat Liar to the Presidency. What you see, is what you get with Hillary (as long as the polls tip your way that particular day).
One last thing. Hillary states that we can’t make this mistake again…she is constantly pointing a finger at Bush for mistakes made in Iraq. Arm-chair-quarterback at its epitome. So mark my words, if Hillary gets the Presidency and she pushes forth her National Healthcare Plan…and 1 year into it, that fund is so broke that it has to be supplemented by Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security funds, and in 2 years, when National Health and Medicare and Medicaid and SS are ALL fuckin’ bankrupt - I hope someone replays this message for her.
August 21st, 2007 at 3:23 pm@ Bashman
Hillary the chameleon.
Bashman -
I like shape-shifter better … Makes her sound more like the damn evil alien she is.
August 21st, 2007 at 3:46 pmI KNOW THAT MOST EVERYONE THAT POSTS HERE IS AWARE OF WHAT ALL THE “USUAL SUSPECTS” (DEMS) SAID LEADING UP TO THE WAR IN IRAQ.
BUT IF YOU DON’T REMEMBER, YOU CAN READ AND OR COPY ALL THIS TO SHOW TO A LIB WHEN THEY WANT TO ARGUE ABOUT IT BEING AN UNJUST WAR.
FREEDOM AGENDA- QUOTES AND FACTS ON IRAQ
http://www.freedomagenda.com/iraq/wmd_quotes.html
ENJOY!!
August 21st, 2007 at 3:53 pmHehe the only person “years behind” on anything is Hillary and her kind, behind on the news and looking pathetic as always. She’s gotta be like a year late in having some advisor tell her about “al-Anbar.”
August 21st, 2007 at 5:09 pmSorry, but twat is what immediatly comes to mind…
August 21st, 2007 at 7:22 pmDan:
August 21st, 2007 at 7:27 pmI beg to differ. Real lefties hate her–they consider her a corporate sell out tool.
LL,
Real lefties also consider her hawkish. It’s a laugh, but real leftythink always is.
August 22nd, 2007 at 4:24 am