Iran Kills Record Number Of U.S. Troops In July

BAGHDAD, Aug. 7 — Attacks on American-led forces using a lethal type of roadside bomb said to be supplied by Iran reached a new high in July, according to the American military.
The devices, known as explosively formed penetrators, were used to carry out 99 attacks last month and accounted for a third of the combat deaths suffered by the American-led forces, according to American military officials.
“July was an all-time high,” … Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, the No. 2 commander in Iraq, said in an interview, referring to strikes with such devices.
Such bombs, which fire a semi-molten copper slug that can penetrate the armor on a Humvee and are among the deadliest weapons used against American forces, are used almost exclusively by Shiite militants. American intelligence officials have presented evidence that the weapons come from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Iran, although Tehran has repeatedly denied providing lethal assistance to Iraqi groups.
In recent weeks, the American military has focused on mounting operations in sanctuaries used by Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, a Sunni group that is predominately made up of Iraqis but has foreign leadership. But, as the information provided by General Odierno shows, Shiite militias remain a major long-term worry.
In focusing on Al Qaeda in Mesopotamia, the American goal is to reduce the number of car bombings and spectacular suicide attacks that have aggravated sectarian tensions, encouraged Shiite retaliation and undermined efforts at political reconciliation.
While the group is seen by the American military as the most serious near-term threat, there are other signs that Shiite militias remain active. According to General Odierno, the day-to-day commander of American troops in Iraq, Shiite militants carried out 73 percent of the attacks that killed or wounded American troops in Baghdad in July.
Though explosively formed penetrators account for a small fraction of roadside bomb attacks in Iraq, they cause a disproportionately large number of casualties.
Of the 69 members of the American-led forces killed in action in July, the lowest toll in months, 23 died as a result of attacks with the devices, according to data supplied by General Odierno’s command. Of the 614 allied troops who were wounded that month, 89 were hit in penetrator attacks.
Penetrator attacks have been a worry for years. In 2005, the United States sent a private diplomatic protest to Tehran complaining that its Revolutionary Guards and the Iranian-backed Hezbollah had been training Iraqi Shiite insurgents in Iran and providing them with bomb-making equipment.
American intelligence says that its report of Iranian involvement is based on a technical analysis of exploded and captured devices, interrogations of Shiite militants, the interdiction of trucks near Iran’s border with Iraq and parallels between the use of the weapons in Iran and in southern Lebanon by Hezbollah.
Some critics of Bush administration policy, saying there is no proof that the top echelons of Iran’s government are involved, accuse the White House of exaggerating the role of Iran and Syria to divert attention from its own mistakes.
According to American military data, penetrator attacks accounted for 18 percent of combat deaths of Americans and allied troops in Iraq in the last quarter of 2006. The number of such attacks declined in January, and some American officials thought at that time that this might be a response to their efforts to publicly highlight the allegations of an Iranian role.
But in recent months such attacks have risen steadily.
The July figure is roughly double the number for January. The total for July is also 50 percent higher than in April, when there were 65 penetrator attacks, according to American military officials.
Many of the penetrators faced by American forces are difficult to counter. Because they fire from the side of the road, the militants do not need to dig a hole to plant them, making them well suited for urban use. Because they are set off by a passive infrared sensor, they cannot be thwarted by electronic jamming.
General Odierno said Iran was increasing its support to Shiite militants in Iraq to step up the military pressure on the United States at a time when the Congress is debating whether to withdraw American troops.
“I think it is because the Iranians are surging support to the special groups,” he said, referring to the American name for Iranian-backed cells here. “Over the last three to four months, it has picked up in terms of equipment, training and dollars.”
“I think they want to influence the decision potentially coming up in September,” he added.
General Odierno said Iranians had also provided Shiite groups with 107-millimeter rockets and the launchers for firing them, as well as 122-millimeter mortars.
American forces, he said, recently thwarted an attack at a military base used by forces from the Third Infantry Division. Fifty launchers equipped with rockets were discovered within range of the facility and struck by allied aircraft. Serial numbers taken from the rocket launchers, he said, indicated that they were made in Iran.
Iranian and American diplomats held talks in Baghdad on Monday on security in Iraq. Ryan C. Crocker, the American envoy in Iraq who led the discussions for the United States, said there had been “an escalation, not a de-escalation” of Iran’s support for militias in Iraq since an earlier May meeting.
The Iranians, Mr. Crocker added, maintained their position that they had “absolutely nothing to do with” the attacks.



Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
To all military people-is there ANYTHING we can do to stop this?We are not at war with iran, and I want them to stop killing our guys

August 8th, 2007 at 3:16 amThis is horrible. They should be stopped, seriously! Too many good guys are dying!
August 8th, 2007 at 3:33 amI think, actually, that we are at war with Iran.
August 8th, 2007 at 3:40 amIt’s just that we don’t fight back, much,
so Iran has gotten the wrong idea that we never will fight back.
I suppose you could increase the armor on everything, using
depleted uranium and tungsten alloys - an I suppose you could try
to screen every single container vessel that delivers containers
to NYC or LA - but screen every single yacht on the high seas?
Once Iran has some nukes, (keep in mind that their claim that they
are pursuing civilian power doesn’t correlate well with the fact that
they are not building any actual nuclear power stations), then it
would be better if Iran has learned that yes, really, we will fight
back. Otherwise an American city or two or three is going to
be destroyed.
It would appear a message needs to be sent. I have pondered on what that would be. If we have a third party set off car bombs in Tehran we are no better than they are (?). If we drop a MOAB on one of their cities we invite retaliation/war. Hmm, aren’t there some rebels inside Iran that could use some weapons to raise hell? I sure hope we are trying to raise some HUMINT assets there. That way we might find out when a shipment is coming and capture it and display it for the MSM along with some Iranians (living optional). Maybe we need to do all of the above.
August 8th, 2007 at 4:23 amTed, even if there was a huge capture of a shipment AND the MSM covered the story, don’t you think the democRat spinners would be out there challenging the validity of the find, blaming Bush for planting the evidence? They’d probably say that Mark Furhman gave Bush the know-how to fake evidence. You know the Daily Kossaks would. If Bush had any real stones, Iran would be paying a heavy price for their conduct right now. If we had a loyal democRat party, that task would be much easier.
August 8th, 2007 at 5:52 amtehran=dresden
decapitate that government and continue to decapitate the successors until someone who wants to have iran join the modern world takes power
that culture does not accept that different religions can coexistent, and I have no desire to spend a good part of my day bent over facing east in submission to a child fucking monster
August 8th, 2007 at 6:10 amNewt Gingrich is right. We are fighting a phony war. Britain fought a phony war with Germany under the leadership of Chamberlain. The invasion of western Europe and Dunkirk changed their thinking. This country is just not ready to engage the threat and unfortunately we will lose a city. We need a Churchill or a Grant not the likes of Pelosi and Reid. Grant’s Wilderness Campaign was incredibly costly in lives, but Grant knew numbers were on his side and he pursued his enemy relentlessly. Mistakes will be made but we have incredible technology on our side.
August 8th, 2007 at 7:15 amSteve in NC -
tehran=dresden
Now in my lexicon.
August 8th, 2007 at 10:22 amI’m sorry but this is the NYSlimes=major liars.
August 8th, 2007 at 12:31 pmIran is a problem, but for the Slimes to report that they’re killing “record numbers of U.S. troops” (without also reporting how many of them we’ve killed) is just another treasonous lie from Pravda-on-the-Hudson.
“Newt Gingrich is right. We are fighting a phony war”
August 8th, 2007 at 12:39 pmI totally agree with his assessment. I cant believe the MSM tried to portray him as being against the war when what he meant was that the war isnt being fully fought. Engage the sources of terror (iran, syria, saudi arabia) not just the peripheries! Yes, Iraq is the center of the war on terror but if we only fight within its borders then Iran can keep sending in supplies/fighters. We can only truly win when we cut off the sources of radical Islam.
We should remove “IED” from the lexicon. Change it to “IBAD” - Iranian Built Ambush Device.
August 12th, 2007 at 1:41 pm