“A De Facto Authorization For Use Of Military Force Against Iran”

September 26th, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

baby400×319.jpg

Politico:

Webb: “This proposal … is Dick Cheney’s fondest pipe dream.

How did your Senator vote?

After 24 hours of wrangling over legislative language, the Senate adopted a resolution that urges the Bush administration to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guards as a “foreign terrorist organization.”

Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), the leading voice in opposition to the resolution, said the Senate was essentially labeling a formal arm of the Iranian military as a terrorist organization because the IRGC is part of the Tehran government. Most State Department designated terrorist organizations are not officially part of foreign governments.

Webb said the resolution was “a de facto authorization for use of military force against Iran.”

The vote was 76-22, but Republican supporters had to drop two key paragraphs from the non-binding legislation to win over most Democrats. The deleted sections would have called for the United States to use “all instruments of United States national power inside Iraq” including diplomatic and military means, to support American policy in containing the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which has been a major supplier of arms to Iraqi insurgents.

The softening of the resolution still didn’t please a hardened group of 19 Democrats who do not trust the Bush administration or Republicans in setting new policies on Iran. Two Republican senators, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Richard Lugar of Indiana, also voted against the resolution.

Democratic presidential candidates were divided on the question. Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York voted for the resolution, while Sens. Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware and Christopher Dodd of Connecticut voted against the measure. Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), missed the vote.

Fox News:

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Wednesday overwhelmingly approved a measure sending another rebuke to Tehran, this one aimed at sending a message to the Islamic regime to end military tactics targeting U.S. forces in Iraq.

The vote came one day after Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told international leaders gathered at the U.N. General Assembly that Iran only seeks a peaceful nuclear program, and said that the conversation on the Iranian nuclear program “is now closed.”

The Senate, showing it was not convinced by Ahmadinejad’s proclamations, approved the nonbinding measure on a 76-22 vote. It was sponsored by Sens. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.

he measure — an amendment to the Defense Authorization bill under consideration in the Senate — is in response to growing concerns over Iranian support for insurgent activity in Iraq. Military officials say Iranian weapons have been discovered in insurgent hands, and U.S. officials have captured agents with alleged Iranian ties.

he amendment calls on the State Department to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps as “a foreign terrorist organization.” The designation would allowed for more economic sanctions to be set against the country.

The measure’s opponents, which include Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., said the language is too open-ended, and could be construed as Senate authorization to use force against Iran.

One portion of the amendment reads: “It is the Sense of the Senate … that it should be the policy of the United States to combat, contain, and roll back the violent activities and destabilizing influence inside Iraq of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, its foreign facilitators such as Lebanese Hezbollah, and its indigenous Iraqi proxies.”

“This proposal … is Dick Cheney’s fondest pipe dream. It’s not a prescription for success. At best, it’s a deliberate attempt to divert attention from a failed diplomatic policy. At worst, it could be read as a back-door method of … gaining congressional validation for action without one hearing or without serious debate,” Webb said Tuesday.

At the urging of Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, Lieberman and Kyl took steps Tuesday to remove the most controversial parts of their measure.

Lieberman said Webb was off-base on his interpretation of his proposal.

“Our colleague (Webb) has given the darkest possible interpretation … There is no intention of declaring war,” Lieberman said.

The House on Tuesday also passed a measure calling for greater economic sanctions against Iran. That bill, passed on a 397-16 vote, would block foreign investment in Iran, especially its energy sector, and would bar the president from waiving U.S. sanctions.

The motions out of Congress come on a highly anticipated week in which President Bush and international foe Ahmadinejad appeared at the same podium, only hours apart at the U.N.’s annual meeting on Tuesday. The drama also followed a contentious appearance by Ahmadinejad at Columbia University in New York.

On Tuesday, Bush announced new sanctions against the government of Myanmar and called on world leaders to fight oppression from contries like those of Iran. Ahmadinejad spoke at length about “arrogant powers” illegally imposing sanctions on his nation.


10 Responses

  1. sully

    Cool… about time.

    FUCK WEBB.

  2. Fight4TheRight

    As far as I can tell, Barack Obama has “missed” every single controversial Senate vote in the past two weeks. Has anyone seen this guy? Have looked in Vince Foster’s car parked out in that Virginia park?

  3. xGhost

    Mark my words, Sen. H Clinton (after voting FOR the resolution) will be bashing it in the future. I wonder if she’ll claim (again) that she was tricked, lied to, blah blah blah..

  4. political.fish

    This is a step in the right direction, however, as the Iranian forces continue to kill our servicemembers, all the Senate can do is pass weak measures. What a bunch of idiots.

  5. Clyde Conneer

    0′Bambam Barry is out and about beggin’ for dough, cant be bothered with the Senate’s business. Good deal, he’s always wrong.

  6. Dan(The Infidel)

    Jimmybob Webb is a de facto idiot. Fuck him. Hoo-ah Senate…

  7. Mark Tanberg

    NON BINDING? what the hell, what a waste of time. Lets talk about fixing the car but lets not spend any money OK.
    How about DOING something for once. In what way will this measure guide missiles down the stacks of the reactor in Iran?

  8. CPLViper

    Fuck the Senate, they did NOTHING with this non-binding bullshit. Is THIS what my fucking tax dollars buy? A bunch of hand-out programs for the lazy and weak ass non-binding legislation that directly relates to the survival of our country? Is there no one in the government with a set of balls? Can the Senate ever do anything except spin it’s wheels thinking up bills that are regurgitated, twisted forms of laws already in place and not enforced? Can the moronic Democrats ever stand on the side of their own countrymen and agree to kill the enemy before they kill us? For all that is holy in this world, get the fucking ball rolling! We should have timed a cruise missile strike on Iran’s airport with the landing of their asshole dictator. It would have been a nice surprise and a nice start … next take out their refineries, drop the 30,000lb deep earth penetrators on every underground nuclear ‘research’ facility, bomb the shit out of their communication lines, cruise missile their SAM sites, stealth bomber their military air bases, bomb their military personnel and sink their diesel subs and frigates. Do it over a weekend. Then on Monday the US Senate can spin their wheels trying to figure out what the fuck just happened … it should take them to the end of the week before they are all distracted by something shiny.

  9. Ranger

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri4LbL96tLQ

  10. Sandy K.

    CPL Viper, man, you covered it all.

    What you said! :mad:

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: