“Intolerable Consequences For Crucial National Security Operations”

October 3rd, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

captsgefqt01031007013236photo00photodefault-512×346.jpg

WASHINGTON (AP) - Congress is moving to update a law that has kept Blackwater USA and other private security contractors in Iraq immune to criminal prosecution. The White House contends the change could cause new problems.

The House is expected to pass legislation on Thursday by Rep. David Price, D-N.C., that would extend the criminal jurisdiction of U.S. courts to any federal contractor working alongside military operations. Senate Democratic leaders said they planned to follow suit as soon as possible and send the measure to President Bush.

White House officials say they support increasing accountability of contractors abroad, but worry that the House bill is too vague and may go too far. An administration statement Wednesday said the bill would have “unintended and intolerable consequences for crucial and necessary national security activities and operations.”

The White House also cited concerns with stretching FBI resources by mandating that the agency conduct investigations overseas. Also, officials said they feared the military could be overtaxed if required to support criminal investigations led by the Justice Department.

The legislation comes amid a string of allegations involving Blackwater employees hired by the State Department to protect diplomatic personnel in Iraq.

In one case, a drunk Blackwater employee left a Christmas eve party in Baghdad and fatally shot the guard of one of Iraq’s vice presidents. The contractor was fired, fined and returned home to the United States; no charges have been filed.

More recently, Blackwater guards were involved in a Sept. 16 shootout that left 11 Iraqis dead. The FBI is investigating.

It is unclear whether charges can be brought against any of the contractors. Federal officials cite murky laws governing the conduct of U.S. personnel abroad not hired directly by the military. The current law, the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act, covers personnel supporting the mission of Defense Department operations overseas.

Because Blackwater’s primary mission is to protect State Department officials, defense lawyers probably would argue successfully that the law does not apply.

At the same time, U.S. contractors are immune from prosecution by Iraqi courts.

In a statement, Price said the White House’s objections were unfounded and “should infuriate anyone who believes in the rule of law.

“The fact is the administration has an embarrassing track record for investigating and prosecuting misconduct by contractors working in our name,” Price said.

“Beyond firing him for breaking the rules, withholding any funds we can, we can’t flog him,” Prince said of the intoxicated Blackwater guard. “We can’t incarcerate him. We can’t do anything beyond that.”


4 Responses

  1. Jim

    —-“The fact is the administration has an embarrassing track record for investigating and prosecuting misconduct by contractors working in our name,” Price said.—-

    Hmmm, me think he speak from ass, or head while visiting ass

    That is purely a political statement and untrue…

  2. sully

    “…we can’t flog him,” Prince said of the intoxicated Blackwater guard. “We can’t incarcerate him. We can’t do anything beyond that.”

    Yeah, we know how that must make you feel. :sad:
    Apparently we can’t flog or incarcerate you and your partners in crime for the treason you commit.
    After all, who could reasonably expect a Dhimmicrat to support a law when it’s not in his own personal interest to do so.

  3. ClydeConneer

    “The fact is the administration has an embarrassing track record for investigating and prosecuting misconduct by contractors working in our name,”

    Yeah, and a miserable record for investigating and prosecuting Sandy Burglar, election fraud and exposure of State Secrets by news outlets but the D’rats aren’t complaining about that,are they?

  4. Q_Mech

    So they can extend US civil jurisdiction to American citizens operating in other countries, but they can’t extend military judicial jurisdiction to cover the terrorists captured by the military and held in Gitmo?

    I know its not exactly a simple comparison, but I’m glad to see that our noble Congress is working so hard to solve the most pressing problems of our time.

    Now, the fact that your average street monkey doesn’t understand that “closing Gitmo” and/or placing everyone in it in front of a judge lies in the hands of Congress and not THAT EVIL BOOOSH!!!…. Certainly that has nothing to do with this particular staging of priorities.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: