Intimidating Imams Booted From Flight Case Will Go To Court

November 21st, 2007 Posted By Bash.

piggies
When pigs fly…

…the men were arrested because three had one-way tickets and no checked baggage; most had requested seat belt extensions (which they placed on the floor); a passenger reported that they had prayed “very loudly” before the flight and criticized U.S. involvement with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and they were seated widely throughout the aircraft…

MINNEAPOLIS - Six Muslim imams arrested on a U.S. Airways jet in Minneapolis last November after a passenger raised suspicions about their pre-flight prayers and boarding activities won an early victory Tuesday in their federal lawsuit against the airline and the Metropolitan Airports Commission.

U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery’s opinion and order rejected almost all of the defendants’ arguments for dismissal. She said the question of whether airport officers had probable cause to arrest the men must be determined by the objective facts they had available at the time.

Over the past year, the case has triggered a firestorm of debate about security concerns vs. religious rights. The imams have argued that they were removed because of religious and ethnic bias. The airline says they were ejected solely because of security concerns raised by passengers and crew members.

Frederick Goetz, one of the imams’ attorneys, praised the judge’s decision, saying: “This has always been a straightforward civil rights case. You had six individuals … doing absolutely nothing wrong. They prayed in the airport and got arrested. That’s unconstitutional, and they deserve redress.”

Attorneys for the airport commission could not be reached for comment Tuesday. U.S. Airways said Tuesday evening that it was studying the order. “We continue to stand by the actions of our crew members and employees, but at this point we can’t say anything definitive about next steps,” said spokeswoman Andrea Rader.

According to a police report, the men were arrested because three had one-way tickets and no checked baggage; most had requested seat belt extensions; a passenger reported that they had prayed “very loudly” before the flight and criticized U.S. involvement with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, and they were seated widely throughout the aircraft.

Montgomery said it is “dubious” that a reasonable person would conclude from those facts that the imams were about to interfere with the crew or aircraft. She said the plaintiffs had stated a plausible claim that MAC officers violated their constitutional rights.

Ahmed Shqeirat, Mohamed Ibrahim, Didmar Faja, Omar Shahin, Mahmoud Sulaiman and Marwan Sadeddin were arrested as they returned home from the North American Conference of Imams. Ibrahim lives in California, the others in Arizona.

Faja, Sadeddin and Shqeirat said they saw an older couple watching the other imams as they prayed. They said the man placed a phone call.

Sulaiman helped Sadeddin, who is blind, board the plane and escorted him to his seat in row 4 before going to his own seat in row 9. Another passenger switched seats with Sadeddin so Sulaiman could assist his friend. Shahin was seated in first class. The others were seated in rows 25 and 21.

Police boarded and asked the imams to exit the plane, which they did. They were later ordered to get their carry-on baggage and were taken to the airport police precinct. After several hours, federal agents interviewed them, cleared them of wrongdoing and said they could leave. U.S. Airways refused to book new flights and they departed on Northwest.


6 Responses

  1. Jim

    What is it with those F*cking muslims and the Minneapolis airport. These SOB decided to create an uncomfortable experience for everyone else…These hateful B*stards have got a foothold in Minnesota and their exploiting it

    http://www.americancongressfortruth.com/

  2. John Cunningham

    They’re setting us up and breaking us down.

  3. locknload

    Another P O S district judge keeps these pieces of human debris on the streets.
    “Dubious” that a “reasonable person” would conclude these asshats would interfer w/flightcrew or aircraft– oh fuckin really?
    Might be true if this “reasonable” person had been off the planet for the last 6yrs 2mos.10 day’s! Maybe you can ride the next one down in your flowing black robe. —disgusting!

    Support and encourage U.S. Airways

  4. Valerie

    This is neither unexpected, nor a bad development.

    Any competent lawyer could have written a complaint sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss in these circumstances. Presenting a case that avoids embarrassing the “Imams” and their supporters — that will be difficult.

    Let the wheels of justice grind.

  5. ViperDriver

    :twisted: Hopefully on my next flight I can snuggle up next to one of these POS’s, offer to share my BLT and wash it down with a nice, icy Bud! Opps, did that offend you?!? Piss off!

  6. TJ (The kafir)

    thanks for the picture , its nice to have a picture to go with my disdain. If I ever have the privilege to fly with these a-holes , i promise they wont be intimidating anyone, in fact, I am sure if they attempt i will make an ass out of myself as a way to bring the plane back to the gate. We need to stop worrying about people like this and reverend phelps filing lawsuits. they live by such things because it brings them publicity. but the government cant protect them from ordinary citizens who feel threatened by their obvious aatempts to intimidate. If I see this BS myself I am going to knee cap them all the while singing the prtaises of Allah! :idea:

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: