<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Death Toll In Iraq Lowest Since Feb &#8216;04 - 2nd Lowest All-Time</title>
	<link>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/</link>
	<description>The latest in policital news and the war in Iraq</description>
	<pubDate>Thu,  4 Dec 2008 01:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: CJW</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-87922</link>
		<author>CJW</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 04:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-87922</guid>
					<description>But the AP likes to accentuate the negative instead:

&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071230/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_casualties" rel="nofollow"&gt;2007 deadliest for US troops in Iraq&lt;/a&gt;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071230/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_casualties</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the AP likes to accentuate the negative instead:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071230/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_casualties" rel="nofollow">2007 deadliest for US troops in Iraq</a><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071230/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_casualties" rel="nofollow">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071230/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_casualties</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoomr113</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-87989</link>
		<author>KBoomr113</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-87989</guid>
					<description>According to icasualties.org there were 14 hostile fire deaths and 9 non hostile fire deaths for American soldiers in December 2007.  Most non hostile fire deaths are accidents of some sort</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to icasualties.org there were 14 hostile fire deaths and 9 non hostile fire deaths for American soldiers in December 2007.  Most non hostile fire deaths are accidents of some sort</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-88057</link>
		<author>Brian H</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-88057</guid>
					<description>KBoomz;
I think you double-counted; 8 non-hostile, 14 hostile, total 22.

So it's time to update my semi-annual tallies:

Statistics are very sensitive to start-stop points and so on.  So from the data we have, how about a comparison by half-year?  Start with either Jan. '03 or March '03. (Hostile action deaths).
6 months ending:
   Calendar     &#124;    From Onset
2003/06   134   &#124;   2003/08  178
2003/12   189   &#124;   2004/02  196 
2004/06   311   &#124;   2004/08  359   
2004/12   408   &#124;   2005/02  405 
2005/06   309   &#124;   2005/08  333 
2005/12   367   &#124;   2006/02  335 
2006/06   293   &#124;   2006/08  301 
2006/12   410   &#124;   2007/02  463 
2007/06   529   &#124;   2007/08  502 
2007/12   233   &#124;   2008/02  111 (to date)   
Total: 3183             3183 
6-mo. Ave:     318.3

Ist half of year averages:     
       315.2   &#124;         334.6

2nd half of year averages:
       321.4     &#124;         302 

6-mo averages excluding '07:
      ~303     &#124;        ~321 

1st half excluding '07:
      ~262     &#124;        ~293

2nd half excluding '07/'08
      ~344     &#124;        ~350  

So: the 1st half of calendar '07 exceeded the previous average by ~267.  The second half was below the average by ~85, and ~88 below the average of the 2nd halves of the year.  Compared to the previous overall 6 mo. average, the 6-mo calender 2nd half of '07 is ~111 lower.  

For the 6-month periods since onset, there's time to make up for the final period, but the 1st half of '07/08 is ~209 above the previous averages.  The second half is 239 below the previous average, with 2 months to make up the difference.  If the current total (last 4 months) increases 50%, the total will be ~167, 142 below the previous 2nd half average.  If the ~22/month average from Nov-Dec holds, the total will be 155, or 195 below the previous 2nd half year average.  

So two alternate predictions come out of this.  

If you believe this is a fluke, not a "trend", you need 239 more fatalities before the end of February to bring the current 6-month averages up to snuff.   

If you believe the numbers show a trend, you'd expect about 30 more fatalities by the end of February.    

So the differences in predictions are: anti-liberationists had a serious shortfall of 111 deaths for the calendar half-year ending Dec. '07.

Anti-liberationists need 239 US combat deaths by the end of February to bring things back on track, and liberationists expect no more than 30, for a difference of 209.  

Place yer bets, ladies and gentlebongs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KBoomz;<br />
I think you double-counted; 8 non-hostile, 14 hostile, total 22.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s time to update my semi-annual tallies:</p>
<p>Statistics are very sensitive to start-stop points and so on.  So from the data we have, how about a comparison by half-year?  Start with either Jan. &#8216;03 or March &#8216;03. (Hostile action deaths).<br />
6 months ending:<br />
   Calendar     |    From Onset<br />
2003/06   134   |   2003/08  178<br />
2003/12   189   |   2004/02  196<br />
2004/06   311   |   2004/08  359<br />
2004/12   408   |   2005/02  405<br />
2005/06   309   |   2005/08  333<br />
2005/12   367   |   2006/02  335<br />
2006/06   293   |   2006/08  301<br />
2006/12   410   |   2007/02  463<br />
2007/06   529   |   2007/08  502<br />
2007/12   233   |   2008/02  111 (to date)<br />
Total: 3183             3183<br />
6-mo. Ave:     318.3</p>
<p>Ist half of year averages:<br />
       315.2   |         334.6</p>
<p>2nd half of year averages:<br />
       321.4     |         302 </p>
<p>6-mo averages excluding &#8216;07:<br />
      ~303     |        ~321 </p>
<p>1st half excluding &#8216;07:<br />
      ~262     |        ~293</p>
<p>2nd half excluding &#8216;07/&#8217;08<br />
      ~344     |        ~350  </p>
<p>So: the 1st half of calendar &#8216;07 exceeded the previous average by ~267.  The second half was below the average by ~85, and ~88 below the average of the 2nd halves of the year.  Compared to the previous overall 6 mo. average, the 6-mo calender 2nd half of &#8216;07 is ~111 lower.  </p>
<p>For the 6-month periods since onset, there&#8217;s time to make up for the final period, but the 1st half of &#8216;07/08 is ~209 above the previous averages.  The second half is 239 below the previous average, with 2 months to make up the difference.  If the current total (last 4 months) increases 50%, the total will be ~167, 142 below the previous 2nd half average.  If the ~22/month average from Nov-Dec holds, the total will be 155, or 195 below the previous 2nd half year average.  </p>
<p>So two alternate predictions come out of this.  </p>
<p>If you believe this is a fluke, not a &#8220;trend&#8221;, you need 239 more fatalities before the end of February to bring the current 6-month averages up to snuff.   </p>
<p>If you believe the numbers show a trend, you&#8217;d expect about 30 more fatalities by the end of February.    </p>
<p>So the differences in predictions are: anti-liberationists had a serious shortfall of 111 deaths for the calendar half-year ending Dec. &#8216;07.</p>
<p>Anti-liberationists need 239 US combat deaths by the end of February to bring things back on track, and liberationists expect no more than 30, for a difference of 209.  </p>
<p>Place yer bets, ladies and gentlebongs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian H</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-88061</link>
		<author>Brian H</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-88061</guid>
					<description>Correction and addendum:

"the 1st half of calendar '07 exceeded the previous average by ~267.  The second half was below the average by ~85, and ~88 below the &lt;b&gt;overall&lt;/b&gt; average of the 2nd halves of the year.  Compared to the previous &lt;b&gt;2nd half&lt;/b&gt; 6 mo. average, the 6-mo calender 2nd half of '07 was ~111 lower."

And just to continue the "highest, lowest" theme of Pat's post: 
the 2nd half of calendar '07 is the lowest since '03, 
and the 2nd half of '07 since onset is on track to be the lowest EVER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction and addendum:</p>
<p>&#8220;the 1st half of calendar &#8216;07 exceeded the previous average by ~267.  The second half was below the average by ~85, and ~88 below the <b>overall</b> average of the 2nd halves of the year.  Compared to the previous <b>2nd half</b> 6 mo. average, the 6-mo calender 2nd half of &#8216;07 was ~111 lower.&#8221;</p>
<p>And just to continue the &#8220;highest, lowest&#8221; theme of Pat&#8217;s post:<br />
the 2nd half of calendar &#8216;07 is the lowest since &#8216;03,<br />
and the 2nd half of &#8216;07 since onset is on track to be the lowest EVER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBoomr113</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-88065</link>
		<author>KBoomr113</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2007/12/us-death-toll-in-iraq-lowest-since-feb-04-2nd-lowest-all-time/#comment-88065</guid>
					<description>thanks, i was really drunk when i posted that. I think i counted the british fatality when I was trying to focus on American casualties only, but to be honest I don't remember.....     At either rate, I'm hoping on zero next month.  Especially zero non hostile casualties, even though accidents do happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, i was really drunk when i posted that. I think i counted the british fatality when I was trying to focus on American casualties only, but to be honest I don&#8217;t remember&#8230;..     At either rate, I&#8217;m hoping on zero next month.  Especially zero non hostile casualties, even though accidents do happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
