Bush Blames Dems For Gas Prices

April 30th, 2008 Posted By Pat Dollard.

bilde12.jpeg

Wash. Times:

President Bush blamed the Democratic Congress for blocking bills he said would have lowered gas prices, marking a coordinated strategy with congressional Republicans to shift responsibility for the nation’s economic woes to Democrats. They, in turn, were quick to strike back.

“I’ve repeatedly submitted proposals to help address these problems. Yet time after time, Congress chose to block them,” Mr. Bush said yesterday during a news conference in the Rose Garden.

“I believe that they’re letting the American people down. I’m perplexed, I guess, is the best way to describe it, about why there’s no action, inactivity, on big issues.”

House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat, responded to Mr. Bush by saying “the president has proclaimed that he is the ‘Decider,’ but this morning all he tried to do is pass the buck to someone else rather than accept responsibility for his administration’s failed economic policies and escalating gas prices.”

“For his first six years in office, the president and the Republican majorities in Congress did virtually nothing to address gasoline prices and to make America more energy independent,” he said. “Then, with new Democratic majorities in Congress, we passed landmark energy legislation that will increase fuel economy and invest in renewable and alternative fuel sources.”

Senate and House Republicans, meanwhile, simultaneously unleashed a barrage of press releases and rhetoric saying that Democrats, such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California, own the gas-price problem.

Oil recently hit $120 a barrel and gas is heading toward $4 a gallon this summer.

“Two years ago, Speaker Pelosi promised the American people that the Democrats had a ‘common-sense plan’ to lower rising gas prices. Not only haven’t we seen this plan, but prices have soared by $1.27 since Representative Pelosi became speaker,” said House Minority Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican.

Mrs. Pelosi was quick to cite “years of neglect to our economic condition” by the Bush administration.

Republicans, however, said Democrats repeatedly have blocked attempts to increase domestic production, going all the way back to President Clinton’s 1996 veto of a bill that would have opened up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska for drilling.

The White House held a series of conference calls during the past three weeks with Republican Party officials from House and Senate leadership offices to coordinate their message on gas prices, a senior Republican aide said.

House Republicans have coined the phrase “Pelosi Premium.”

Senate Republicans yesterday circulated a picture of Democratic senators standing in front of a Capitol Hill gas station on April 27, 2006, when they protested prices of $3.09 for a gallon of regular, next to a picture of the same sign this week, with regular at $3.85 a gallon.

During his second White House news conference of the year, the president focused much of his attention on Democratic opposition to expanding domestic oil production.

“There are a lot of reserves to be found in ANWR. That’s a given,” Mr. Bush said. “We can explore in environmentally friendly ways.”

“And yet this is a litmus-test issue for many in Congress. Somehow if you mention ANWR, it means you don’t care about the environment. Well, I’m hoping now people, when they say ANWR, it means you don’t care about the gasoline prices that people are paying,” he said.

Republicans say ANWR would produce 1 million barrels a day, but Democrats point out that it would take 10 years to bring production online, and that supply would only last for six months.

Mr. Bush also said he would consider the “gas tax holiday” from Memorial Day to Labor Day, which has been proposed by Sen. John McCain of Arizona, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee.

But the president resisted calls from Democrats and 16 Republican senators to pause deposits in the U.S. strategic petroleum reserve (SPR). He used such a tool to stall gas price spikes in April 2006.

Mr. Bush said that the 75,000 barrels per day deposited in the SPR would have little impact if they were released for consumption — the U.S. imports about 12 million barrels a day, consumes about 20 million barrels a day, and the worldwide demand is 85 million barrels a day.

But later in the day, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said that after stopping SPR deposits for the summer of 2006, the White House concluded that “it did not have an effect.”

Mr. Bush also did not deny — as he did one week ago — that the U.S. is in a recession. Instead, he sidestepped specific questions saying that “the average person doesn’t really care what we call it.”

“The average person wants to know whether or not we know that they’re paying higher gasoline prices and that they’re worried about staying in their homes, and I do understand that,” Mr. Bush said.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, New York Democrat, railed against the president that “all of the sudden, he’s realizing the problems.”


7 Responses

  1. Steve in NC

    How about you bunch of self serving assholes do something for the good of this nation and not for your selves for once?

    President Bush wasted time energy and lives trying to bring a new tone to the hill.

    If these sphincters wanted to really do something about fuel prices, launch a genuine effort to expand and increase the development of our own fossil fuel resources. The futures would drop nearly immediately and give fast relief to the cost of crude.

    FUCK OPEC. Who cares what they do in reaction.

    Use a small tariff on our own production to fund a government and private industry effort to research alternatives to fossil fuel for the use of commercial transportation of goods and services along and production of electricity.
    Kick that stupid idea that bio fuels are a real alternative to the amount of energy we need.

    Rise above the personal greed and do what is best for this nation’s economy, because a strong America is essential to the defense of liberty world wide.

  2. Charles

    It’s simple supply and demand.

    World demand has been steadily increasing, which naturally pushes prices higher. In a sane world, producers would be free to find and increase the supply to meet the increased demand and prices would would come back down.

    From todays Washington Post: “the first thing you should do: start drilling.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/29/AR2008042902394.html

    Why ARE dems blocking drilling in ANWR? (proven reserves of 10 billion barrels)

    Why ARE dems blocking off-shore drilling? (estimated reserves of 10 to 30 billion barrels)

    Why ARE dems blocking development of oil-shale? (estimated reserves of 120 T-R-I-L-L-I-O-N! barrels)

    Why ARE dems blocking the construction of new refineries?

    Why ARE dems blocking the construction of nuke plants?

    In case anyone doesn’t know the answer…it’s because the democrat party is owned by leftists who are more concerned about algore and his band of global warmongers and all those elusive “carbon footprints” than what we’re forced to pay at the pump.

    They should ALL be fired in November.

  3. Boo Boo

    Good for Pres. Bush for starting to throw punches finally. His nice guy routine with Peloski hasn’t gotten him squat. Keep blaming them–just like they always, always blame him for everything under the sun. Keep telling the press about how they blocked every program he proposed. Keep repeating it, and the press will have to report it. Peloski said the dems had a “plan” to bring down energy prices when they got elected in Nov 2006. Where’s the “plan”? Of course, it’s a figment of her imagination.

  4. Boo Boo

    Oh, and Charles: the writer of that article Samuelson is smart–it’s a miracle the WP publishes him and also he is published in Newsweek, of all places. A small miracle.

  5. Rob

    I have one single question. Where has the President been hiding for the past few years? Really this is the guy who got elected. Oh well at least we’re seeing the guy we voted for. Too bad it’s taken a while.

  6. Leatherneck

    “I believe that they’re letting the American people down.”

    No. The American people let themselves down. They voted for socialism. Now suck it up and enjoy your $4.00 per gallon gasoline.

  7. Charles

    Here’s more on the subject from the American Thinker here: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/04/gas_prices_dems_are_getting_ex.html

    Anyone who votes for ANY dem should have their head examined.

    Dems…the anti-troop, anti-war, anti-consumer, anti-capitalist…anti-America party. Tell me again why I can’t question their patriotism?

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: