Comments on: Is A Strike Upon Iran Imminent?

By: SOC

SOC — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:50:39 +0000

Long overdue. Little Hitler and the Mullahs need to go. No nukes for Iran.

By: Kurt(the infidel)

Kurt(the infidel) — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:51:23 +0000

Well all of these signs are very interesting and I have been putting them together too lately. One thing that was not mentioned is the fact that we have a few battle groups sitting off the coast of Lebanon right now and scattered all around, including the guided missile destroyer that was parked in a port in Israel. The group sitting off the coast of Lebanon was there to “oversee Lebanese elections” or something like that.

Plus im sure this time around we would want a serious media blackout on this. I remember the media with the Iraq war, they almost commercialized ’shock and awe’ before it happened. this show brought to you by shock and awe lol
all of the things happening cant be coincidental considering the stakes we face of inaction against Iran.

By: RJI

RJI — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:56:49 +0000

Re indicators. You failed to include the topping off of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

By: steve m

steve m — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:58:26 +0000

Game on. The hot summer may come sooner than expected…

By: Tom in Texas

Tom in Texas — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:04:39 +0000

Re another indicator: The arrival of the Battle Group
Abraham Lincoln

By: MikeMose

MikeMose — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:22:33 +0000

Here it comes and about time. I would think that opening the oil field on US soil would make sense as well. Their is a chance that Iran will make a attempt to stop oil flow out of the gulf.

By: GregGS

GregGS — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:26:16 +0000

oooooooo code pink is gonna have a baby, if THAT’S possible. If we get dusty with iran.

By: Dr. Jerry

Dr. Jerry — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:07:33 +0000

Well…I say:

Get the Bombers in the bullpen, the Nuclear Submarines in the on-deck circle, the Guided Missle Destroyers in the batters box, and let’s PL-A-A-AY BA-A-ALL!

BATTER UP!

By: Specter

Specter — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:11:30 +0000

Iran is going to have to do more then put Sadr in house arrest for a week.

Full compliance or total destruction is the only reasonable diplomacy when dealing with the issue. Don’t forget to point a few nuclear tipped missles at Chavez while were at it. If I were calling the shots, I would contact him within 30 seconds of the first explosion and let him know I recognize the path he’s chosen and make it crystal clear that no bullshit will be tolerated. Make no mistake, that little fuck wants Korean or Iranian nukes in his backyard to point at us!!

By: GregGS

GregGS — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:19:13 +0000

As I look back on arguments with leftist so called friends, at the onset of the Iraq campaign in the war on terrorists, or war on Islam as I like to call it. They would all bring up “”What about Irannnnnn?”" AND I would say in good time Strategy my foolish friend’s in good time we’ll get their. They would just whine like pussies… Well guess what they will all cry now! Why are we going after iran they aren’t responsible for 911!! whine whine whine. I will remind they all be full of “cock” to go after iran before we invaded the stepping stone iraq…

I’m alway’s reminding them that iran is more than 4 time the size of iraq and that they complain that we can’t handle iraq, then why did they think we could of handled iran, what, 4 years 5 years ago.

The troops have got their boots wet sort of speak, considering it a dry sorta place. They’ve learned a lot in since 911 and thats’ what it’s about It’s time dudes.

Just like Patton had faith in his tired cold shot to hell troops… He just sent them to Bastone´ to help out the tough 101st. tough motherfukers all, tried and true.

By: Caligula

Caligula — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:22:41 +0000

perhaps it’s just going to be an airstrike against their uranium enrichment plants and alleged ICBM sites…

By: serfer62

serfer62 — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:45:28 +0000

Another possible dot…the USMC requested complete deployment to Afghanistan into combat. While most were sent, and given no assignment except to train, there are still lots in Iraq.

I don’t think this will happen though until after the elections as it would cause grief for the GOP something W doesn’t want…

By: old11B

old11B — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:23:45 +0000

……..Keep an eye on the weather patterns, and see which way the wind blows….!

By: Dan (The Infidel)

Dan (The Infidel) — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:09:23 +0000

If you scan google, you’ll notice that reporters have been using the “imminent” word to describe the situation between Iran and the US…as a response going all the way back to 2005.

So what’s different now? The IDF doesn’t want Iran to get a nuke…but has yet to strike Iran. The US has the same opinion, but has only war-gamed such a scenario.

Sure, the plans have been drawn up and are sitting on some General’s desktop.

What’s it going to take before we finally, say enough is enough?

Pundints have been speculating on this for 3 years. So what?

Let’s get ‘er done.

By: Freedom Fighter

Freedom Fighter — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:47:21 +0000

Hi Pat,
Thanks for the link..glad you enjoyed the piece.

All Best,
FF

By: Dave M.

Dave M. — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:51:08 +0000

England’s Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, is over in the USA right
now for a trip that doesn’t actually make any sense.
He is meeting the President to “talk about issues related to banks
and tight credit”. Really? You can do that on the phone.
He is also scheduled to spend some time with each of the three
Presidential candidates - that too seems odd and not something
worth an official visit.
Might be nothing or it might be one more dot.

By: Pat "The Christian"

Pat "The Christian" — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:50:08 +0000

The Battle of Cush and Put is on!

By: luke37

luke37 — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:51:40 +0000

Bombs away!

By: Is A Strike Upon Iran Imminent? « Islamo Fasicst watch

Is A Strike Upon Iran Imminent? « Islamo Fasicst watch — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:20:11 +0000

[…] by avideditor on April 17, 2008 Is A Strike Upon Iran Imminent?: […]

By: Kevin M

Kevin M — Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:02:49 +0000

Being that my admiration for presidents pretty much ended with Teddy Roosevelt, it is no suprise that I am not excrutiatingly impressed with GWB; however, his administration (”and a few Marines” sayeth Gunny Hartman) has changed Iraq from a shithole run by a despot to a functioning society crawling out of dysfunctionality. If he ends his presidency with the initiation of the same transformation in Iran, he will go down in history as being easily the best “worst president” in the past 100 years.

I remember the hostage crisis vividly, and I won’t shed a tear if that shithole gets a whopping huge bloody nose.

The only thing a mullah is good for is chumming for sharks. Let the feeding frenzy begin!