Iran ‘Paid Iraq Insurgents To Kill UK Soldiers’ … Is It War Yet?

May 25th, 2008 Posted By drillanwr.

1

Okay … Is THAT war yet? I mean, while I am convinced there were WMD weapons in Iraq, and were scooted out during our sit and spin wait for the U.N. and what-not months, to Syria … I am a FIRM believer that Saddam Hussein and his billions in money (especially American dollars) WAS the biggest WMD that had to be removed. He was already funding homicide bombers in Israel.

Had we NOT invaded Iraq and pulled Saddam out of his spider hole to be eventually hanged after a diet of Nacho Cheese Doritos while in prison … who knows what he would have ‘funded’ against our country … especially after seeing how very little it took to plan and deploy 9-11-01.

1

So now Saddam is bending over for Satan … But we have another maniac happily taking his place across the border … and at a great and grave cost to our troops and the brave troops of our allies …

Time to see Amydidherdad at the end of a rope … or as a pile of smoldering ashes …

“Let’s Roll” … Damn it!

By Sean Rayment - TelegraphUK:

Iran has secretly paid Iraqi insurgents hundreds of thousands of American dollars to kill British soldiers, according to a leaked government document obtained by The Telegraph.

The allegations are contained in a confidential “field report” written by a British officer who served in Basra during one of the most dangerous periods of the conflict. The report, which has never been made public, shows the full level of Iran’s involvement in the insurgency for the first time.

The document states that the Jaish al-Mahdi (JAM) – also known as the Mahdi Army – one of the most violent insurgent groups operating in Basra, used money from Iran to recruit and pay young unemployed men up to $300 (£150) a month to carry out attacks against the British. The findings have been passed to the highest levels in the military.

The leak comes at a time of rising tension between Iran and the international community, as Tehran continues to stonewall UN inquiries into allegations that it has carried out research to develop a nuclear weapon.

The report, “Life Under Fire in the Old State Building”, details the activities of British troops under the command of Major Christopher Job, of the 2nd Lancashire Regiment, between November 2006 and March 2007.

In the report, Major Job discloses that in the course of five months his base was attacked 350 times. Old State Building, which is in the centre of Basra, is the most-attacked British base in recent history.

In an attempt to discover who was behind the attacks, the officer says he established a network of informers, who supplied him with detailed intelligence on the actions of the insurgents and who was behind their funding.

The officer states that the reports of Iran’s involvement came from a network of 25 sources, which included a former Iraqi army general, prominent businessmen, local sheikhs and council leaders.

He writes: “We learnt from a number of our Key Leadership Engagements [local contacts] that the source of the problem was the level of unemployment in Basra.

“JAM, using funding from Iran, paid the unemployed youths in the region of $300 per month to attack Multi National Forces. We also learnt that JAM had a drugs culture and that youths literally got hooked on being associated with JAM.”

Twenty-seven members of the Armed Forces died and dozens were seriously injured in southern Iraq between November 2006 and May 2007, the period that Major Job covers in his report.

A senior British officer who has recently returned from southern Iraq said that the existence of “Iranian finance teams” in Basra was widely known by the British military and Foreign Office, although always officially denied.

He said: “It suited Iran to arm JAM in order to allow them to have the means to hit us.”

Patrick Mercer, the Tory MP and a former infantry commander said: “This report makes it quite clear that Iran is directly involved in funding the insurgency.”

He added: “The Government must confront Tehran over the deaths of British troops – anything else is appeasement.”

A spokesman for the Ministry of Defence said: “There is evidence to suggest a malign influence in Iraq by Iran, including the supply of equipment and armaments which are used by insurgents against UK forces in Iraq.

“This influence is completely unacceptable and serves only to undermine the efforts by the government of Iraq and the coalition.”


6 Responses

  1. Kurt(the infidel)

    Im starting to think it doesnt matter what this psycho does. action against him and his murderous puppets just seems far off. I mean if ANY other country was doing this to us it would be on. wonder if the government knows something we dont that is deterring them

  2. sully

    I think that come Oct, if McCain looks like he will win then Bush leaves it for him. If McCain looks like he can’t win, Bush does something about it before leaving office.
    Or some other such scenario… I hope… :???:
    These fuckers need to pay dearly for what they’ve done.

  3. Jarhead68

    Try to get a declaration of war from the democRat congress now. Never happen. It’ll take a nuke in New York with a claim of responsibility from Iran to invoke that. We all know that evidence and intelligence will be ignored and belittled by the fools on the left.

  4. sully

    “wonder if the government knows something we dont that is deterring them”

    Yeah. That POS Russian puke Putin.
    Iran stoking instability in the region has made Russia rich beyond belief. That’s why they have been kissing each others ass lately. And Russia has been kissing China’s ass as well. Russia and China vetoed new Iran sanctions in the worthless U.N.
    Putin is a POS Leninist/Stalinist KGB thug searching for ways to act tough internationally. Probably threatening (behind closed doors) to ally with IRAN if we do anything about IRAN.

  5. Marc Stockwell-Moniz

    Time for some cruise missiles to be directed torward Iran.
    Pronto

  6. franchie

    well, isn’t the actual Iran a creation of Brzezinzski and of his complaisant supporter Carter ?

    and about their ideal :

    …Zbigniew Brzezinski: What is most important for world history? The Taliban or the fall of the Soviet Empire? Some Islamic hotheads or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?

    Le Nouvel Observateur: “Some hotheads?” But it has been said time and time again: today Islamic fundamentalism represents a world-wide threat…

    Zbigniew Brzezinski: Rubbish! It’s said that the West has a global policy regarding Islam. That’s hogwash: there is no global Islam. Let’s look at Islam in a rational and not a demagogic or emotional way. It is the first world religion with 1.5 billion adherents. But what is there in common between fundamentalist Saudi Arabia, moderate Morocco, militaristic Pakistan, pro-Western Egypt and secularized Central Asia? Nothing more than that which connects the Christian countries…

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: