…He’s the perfect embodiment of the term “empty-suit”…we’d be fuk’n nuts to give him the keys to the White House.

I bet that some readers that come on board also lack of military service

No. It IS an argument against Snobama preaching to a veteran implying that that veteran doesn’t care about veterans.
Why not read the article before jumping into your moral equivalency suit? Oh wait… that’s how you live your life. Sorry, I forgot.

return to the suiter !

He should be the laughing stock of America.

Constitutionally, the President of the United States is COMMANDER IN CHIEF of the Armed Forces. Traditionally, most Presidents have served in some capacity, or another. The more experience in uniform, the better. Granted military experience won’t guarantee the President has perfect judgment, but it does go a long way in making sound decisions.

Having risen to the rank of Captain, and having attended Annapolis, clearly McCain has the edge in national security. Obama didn’t even promote DOMESTIC security back in Chicago, based on his voting record, so why should he be trusted with the button?

thanks for your clarification

that was also the case for our presidents till Sarkozy

I can tell you that before he came in the office, he didn’t know how many submarines we have

Now with his army of concilers, he would not make a mistake anymore, I expect it’s the same for any of your presidents

And what are your quals there BHO? Oh that’s right, you can’t even show up on time to vote?

Obam bam is a wus. Naturally a Sal Alinsky type like BHO would never think of serving the US of KKK. Now would he?

So what makes him think he deserves anything less than a boot in his racist ass now?

I was wrong. They are NOT allowed hostile activities at all. None of the french are,or the Germans. Can’t trust ‘em I guess.

But I understand your complaint of MacNasty. I mean not all of us qualify for service. My 4 in the corps & I never killed anyone.

Just bad luck

Lima Echo

In an article by John Perazzo - Though Alinsky died in 1972, his legacy has lived on as a staple of leftist method, a veritable blueprint for revolution — to which both Democratic presidential candidates, who are his disciples and protégés, refer euphemistically as “change.”

From his “blueprint” for revolution:

“organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution”—a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power

foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted

create a following that will follow the lead of charismatic radical organizer who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly understand what types of societal “changes” are needed.

penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties

Alinsky perceived most Americans as people who were governed by their prejudices, and who thus felt great antipathy toward a majority of their fellow countrymen

issues must be polarized. They are evil we are good

never accept capitulation by the enemy - a hand of friendship in an effort to end the conflict, the crusade of the People’s Organization is jeopardized

Alinsky stated the middle class was essential.
Radical organizers must not only speak the language of the middle class, but that they also must dress their crusades in the vestments of morality.

“go outside the experience of the enemy. Marching mobs of chanting demonstrators accomplishes this objective. The average observer’s reaction to such a display is of a dual nature: First he is afraid. But he also recalls the organizer’s initial articulation of middle-class ideals and morals. Thus he convinces himself that the People’s Organization is surely composed of reasonable people who actually hold values similar to his own.

Is it any wonder why Hillary and O are trying so hard to win the middle class? Notice the “antipathy” statement in gun #5? Right out of the playbook.

Both Hitlery and Obam-bam were devotees of Alinsky. Hitlery met him and wrote a thesis on him in college.

When Obam-bam talks of change he means the Sol Alinsky version of social change. So does the bitch from Hope (or is it really IL???)

I posted this before. I’ll do it again.
http://frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=D6E27ECE-9798-4F01-A378-3F1405F69704

That’s the same article I quoted from. It’s pretty scary to see a “methodology” being used and working. I know the Communist Party USA website is estatic about either one. They think Hillary is more left, but Obama has the charisma that can dupe people.

Yep. Only that methodology has been flaid and fried in Dollatd Nation. There are too many rubes who buy the methodology, partly because they’ve been exposed to it for 12 - 16 years in our failed education system and partly because the rubes and the naive never bothered to study it in depth. Where there is no debate. there is no criticism or discussion. That’s why a clown like Obam-bam and the Hitkery bee-yatch get away with their “change mantras”.

Knowledge is power. Ignorance is servitude to carnival barkers like Obama Bin Lying and his clone that flies on her broom from NY.

Just bad luck”

Did I say something against any of your candidate ?
No, I am just a spectator of a great play, I just insert some snarky reflexions from time to time, I don’t care who will be your president, there will be the same relations with EU, may-be you’ll become more isolationists

your wrong with the legion and the berets rouges, they were not in Irak lately, but in Afghanistan, in Lebanon, in Yougoslavia, and more in Africa, where your government seems not to find interest, though counting on our soldiers to avoid more ethnic catastrophes, don’t tell me because these countries were also part of the french communauty, yeah, but none of the anglo-saxon’s wanted to get there…