“Pro-Choice” Nags Say NARAL Bitches Gave “Pre-Mature” Birth To Hussein Endorsement
Okay … I know yunz could give a fuck about what these abortion rights groups say or think.
I bring this to you only as another indication of the ‘great divide’ happening in the democrat party … Not that the MSM would solidly point it out other than to keep bitching and moaning ‘Why won’t the bitch just quit the race and bow out so The Holy One can reign?’
Yesterday I grit my teeth and posted how NARAL has thrown in for Hussein … Well, in a follow-up, apparently they don’t speak for all the abortion rights klan. So Hillary might still have some of these slugs still in her slime bucket of support. (Quite possibly via a phone call from her yesterday after the NARAL statement … If ya know what I mean … heh!)
For the record … I DO NOT believe in or agree with abortion. My biggest problem with it, outside the obvious slaughter of the unborn issue, is tax dollars funding it … and it being on a federal government level. IF abortion IS to be an issue, I believe it solidly falls into the States Rights catagory. Individual states’ voters, state houses, and courts should be the ones deciding this one way or the other.
NARAL Affiliates Question Obama Endorsement
By Garance Franke-Ruta (WaPo)
NARAL Pro-Choice America affiliates in key swing and primary states are openly distancing themselves from the decision by NARAL Pro-Choice America to endorse Illinois Sen. Barack Obama over Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton to be the Democratic nominee for president.
Since yesterday’s announcement, NARAL groups in Pennsylvania, Missouri, Oregon, Washington, Texas and New York — Clinton’s home state — have issued statements signaling their continued neutrality in the Democratic race and emphasizing that the national group did not speak for them on this matter. These groups represent nearly a quarter of NARAL’s state chapters.
“This decision was not made in consultation with the affiliate network and NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon will not be endorsing a candidate in this race,” said executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon Michele Stranger Hunter in a statement. “We are proud to have two strongly pro-choice candidates running for President. And we look forward to supporting whoever the nominee will be and are committed to defeating Senator John McCain (R-AZ) in November.”
Democrats in Oregon go to the polls on May 20 in one of the last primaries of the cycle.
NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri felt so strongly about staying neutral its president recorded a robocall in the wake of the announcement, which the group then sent to 8,500 households emphasizing its neutrality. “In our membership demographic, a lot of longtime women’s rights supporters are strong supporters of Hillary Clinton,” Sumners told the St. Louis Post Dispatch.
“If we had been consulted, we would have said, ‘Let this play out,’ ” she said.
NARAL Pro-Choice Washington emphasized its neutrality by praising both remaining Democratic candidates. “In the Senate and in their public lives, both Sen. Clinton and Sen. Obama have been leaders for a woman’s right to choose,” said Karen Cooper, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Washington. “Sen. Clinton has worked with our own Sen. Patty Murray to help make birth control more accessible for the women who need it. She, like Sen. Obama, is a co-sponsor of the Federal Freedom of Choice Act, which would put the findings of Roe v. Wade into federal law. Time and again, both Sens. Clinton and Obama have stood up for the right to privacy and the right to choose.”
“American women would be well-served by either Clinton or Obama in the Oval Office,” Cooper added.
NARAL Pro-Choice New York issued a statement calling the national endorsement “premature” and emphasizing that “this decision was made internally by NARAL Pro-Choice America, based in Washington D.C., and without the consultation of the NARAL state affiliates across the country.”
“NARAL Pro-Choice New York will not be issuing an endorsement at this time,” the group continued.
NARAL Pro-Choice Pennsylvania echoed the New York group’s statement, calling the endorsement “premature.”
And NARAL Pro-Choice Texas chose mainly to emphasize that the endorsement of Obama had nothing to do with them, and would have nothing to do with them, rather than publicly renouncing the national endorsement as some of the other groups had. “As NPCT has no federal PAC, our state affiliate can only participate in statewide campaigns, not national ones such as presidential or congressional races. NARAL Pro-Choice America PAC is the only entity authorized to make federal endorsements,” the group said in a terse statement posted on its website. “There is no consultation role for NPCT or other state affiliates in this process.”
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Carpet munching Hillary lovin lib bitches at war with the dick sucking Obama lovin lib bitches.
It gets ugly when they all have PMS together.
May 15th, 2008 at 10:22 amPlanned Parenthood has recieved over one billion dollars already. they speak about how their program is to help decrease the number of abortions by handing out information and birth control yet the numbers of abortions conducted by them has risen by 75% in the last few years alone.
I hear about the commies in this country calling our troops baby killers and i think its the biggest irony ever devised considering that they are the side that in fact murders babies on purpose. and yes by my statement i do believe most military men and women lean more to the conservative side.
May 15th, 2008 at 10:30 amSorry that the mothers of these selfish bitches did not pull THEM out of their guts and throw them in a trash can.
May 15th, 2008 at 10:45 amThey shouldn’t beat themselves up… well, OK that part is fun but there was alot of that premature endorsement AND voting for the Obambi going around.
May 15th, 2008 at 11:05 amSorta like a VERY nasty STD.
“American women would be well-served by either Clinton or Obama in the Oval Office,” Cooper added.
only if the “American Women” you mention are the dumb feminist whores who believe pregnancy is a medical condition. Abortion has become a business… these groups make millions slaughtering the unborn, and they lobby for candidates who will keep them in business;
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1949500/Girl-born-before-24-week-legal-abortion-limit.html
ellie fish was born below the 24week age limit to be aborted… she is now 9months old and is normal and healthy and can leave the hospital.
fucking liberals could have murdered her had her mother been “inconvenienced” by it.
we should raise the abortion age to 90years old and execute all these liberal bastards who want to kill our children for money!
May 15th, 2008 at 11:58 amWell come on now, didn’t we all recently hear reports that the Pro-Abortion movement is directed at a certain race?
This makes perfect sense.
May 15th, 2008 at 12:06 pmreally it depends on the circumstances if the pregnancy is the result of a rape it should be allowed. in all other circumstances it should be illegal.
May 15th, 2008 at 12:51 pmdrillianwr,
I love your articles and commentary, but I hate it when you guys refer to women as “bitches”, “whores” or “cunts” in, at least, in the headlines of your articles.
Not for some politically correct reason, but because actually being respectful to women is a traditional American value I wouldn’t mind seeing a return to. Our media is already saturated with enough convincing our daughters that they should be whores.
Respectfully,
May 15th, 2008 at 1:50 pmB. Verner