<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Global Warming Cult Blinks On Hurricane Predicitons</title>
	<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/</link>
	<description>The latest in policital news and the war in Iraq</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: mike3481</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-163435</link>
		<author>mike3481</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-163435</guid>
					<description>Also...right now, we are breathing the 4th different atmosphere that's existed on this planet. :shock: 

And like the previous 4, we'll have no control over the 5th! :shock:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230;right now, we are breathing the 4th different atmosphere that&#8217;s existed on this planet. <img src='http://patdollard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And like the previous 4, we&#8217;ll have no control over the 5th! <img src='http://patdollard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_eek.gif' alt=':shock:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rightangle</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-163470</link>
		<author>rightangle</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-163470</guid>
					<description>These experts are beginning to remind me of the digital Time/Temp signs that graced the fronts of many banks and businesses starting around the late 70's. It seemed like the bigger the signs got though, the less accurate they became. 

And they're talking about the rise in temp as it relates to a gas that comprises less than one percent of the earth's atmosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These experts are beginning to remind me of the digital Time/Temp signs that graced the fronts of many banks and businesses starting around the late 70&#8217;s. It seemed like the bigger the signs got though, the less accurate they became. </p>
<p>And they&#8217;re talking about the rise in temp as it relates to a gas that comprises less than one percent of the earth&#8217;s atmosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan (The Infidel)</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-163618</link>
		<author>Dan (The Infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 04:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-163618</guid>
					<description>I got no faith in GW enthusiasts. I prefer drawing my own conclusions. If the westher slugs can't get a three-day forecast consistently right, how in the F*ck are they going to correctly project a waether report beyond those three days...much less an accurate hurricane forecast?

If you look at historical waether vis vis bad hurricane years, and look at the years where sunspot activity was the most active, bet you find a correlation between extremely active sunspot activity, warming and an increase in hurricanes.

Lets get back to real science instead of this BS carnival-barking nonsense of man-made GW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got no faith in GW enthusiasts. I prefer drawing my own conclusions. If the westher slugs can&#8217;t get a three-day forecast consistently right, how in the F*ck are they going to correctly project a waether report beyond those three days&#8230;much less an accurate hurricane forecast?</p>
<p>If you look at historical waether vis vis bad hurricane years, and look at the years where sunspot activity was the most active, bet you find a correlation between extremely active sunspot activity, warming and an increase in hurricanes.</p>
<p>Lets get back to real science instead of this BS carnival-barking nonsense of man-made GW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lone Wolf</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-165495</link>
		<author>Lone Wolf</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/05/the-global-warming-cult-blinks-on-hurricane-predicitons/#comment-165495</guid>
					<description>CO2 at 383 ppm mole fraction is 0.0383% (0.000383) of the Earth's atmosphere.  The climate models predict a large impact of CO2 through it's positive feedback on the atmospheric water vapor concentration.  Water vapor is the real driver of the predicted warming.  To get it right the models therefore also need a good treatment of clouds and cloud formation, which they don't have.  Cloud physics happen on the micron scale while the climate models have trouble resolving the mile scale, a factor of a billion or so bigger.  These models are therefore no basis for making policy changes that could cost trillions of dollars, particularly when it's obvious that climate has changed dramatically in the past with no help from us.  We are better off looking at ways to deal with climate change than pursuing the fool's errand of trying to affect the temperature of the Earth - especially when we can't even control our own borders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CO2 at 383 ppm mole fraction is 0.0383% (0.000383) of the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere.  The climate models predict a large impact of CO2 through it&#8217;s positive feedback on the atmospheric water vapor concentration.  Water vapor is the real driver of the predicted warming.  To get it right the models therefore also need a good treatment of clouds and cloud formation, which they don&#8217;t have.  Cloud physics happen on the micron scale while the climate models have trouble resolving the mile scale, a factor of a billion or so bigger.  These models are therefore no basis for making policy changes that could cost trillions of dollars, particularly when it&#8217;s obvious that climate has changed dramatically in the past with no help from us.  We are better off looking at ways to deal with climate change than pursuing the fool&#8217;s errand of trying to affect the temperature of the Earth - especially when we can&#8217;t even control our own borders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
