-
blogroll
- A Soldier's Perspective
- Ace Of Spades
- American Soldier
- Ann Coulter
- Attack Machine
- Awesome Web Design
- Bane Rants
- Bare Naked Islam
- Bill Ardolino
- Bill Roggio
- Black Five
- Blonde Sagacity
- Breitbart
- Chicagoray
- Confederate Yankee
- Day by Day Cartoon
- Euphoric Reality
- Flopping Aces
- Free Republic
- Frontier Web Design
- Hot Air
- Hugh Hewitt
- Ian Schwartz
- Instapundit
- Jules Crittenden
- Little Green Footballs
- Matt Sanchez
- Michael Fumento
- Michael Yon
- Michelle Malkin
- Military.com
- Missiles And Stilletos
- Move America Forward
- MsUnderestimated
- Mudville Gazette
- Pass The Ammo
- Protest Warrior
- Roger L. Simon
- Sportsman's Outfit
- Stop The ACLU
- TCOverride
- The Belmont Club
- The Big God Blog
- The Crimson Blog
- The Daily Gut
- The Drudge Report
- The PoliTicking Timebomb
- The Pundit Review
- Veteran's Affairs Documentary
3 Responses
Respond now.
Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
Okay … HOW does an 8 yr. old swallow over 30 such HARD objects … when you cannot get an 8 yr. old to swallow a Tylenol or an antibiotic pill??
Also, IF she thought they were candy … kids usually CHEW candy, not swallow whole.
Being the parent of an 8 yr. old “special needs” child I am getting a bit of a ‘familiar’ vibe here that this young girl is a bit ‘delayed’ in her mental capacity. And I do not mean that in a mean-spirited way … as I stated my experience in the matter.
The toy in question has an age appropriate limit on the box (I know this because my college daughter Kate was crazy about this building set when she was in middle school and we still have the huge collection, but have NOT handed it down to our 8 yr. old Lizzie as of yet … for obvious reasons). It IS a great toy!
So, if the toy was the property of an older sibling, it is the responsibility of the older sibling and the parents to make sure any children in the home who should not have access to said toy … doesn’t.
It’s NOT the toy company’s fault.
June 3rd, 2008 at 9:49 amYes, my thoughts exactly. And, the little girl obviously didn’t want to BE on TV, so why was she, Dad? And, Dad? Eating seems to be an issue, you know?
June 3rd, 2008 at 10:20 amHmmm seems suspicious to me. After the first bite she would have known they werent candy…unless of course she gorged on them…or was trying to prove a pont to mom and dad.
June 3rd, 2008 at 10:23 pm