<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barak Told Strike On Iran Still In Cards: US</title>
	<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/</link>
	<description>The latest in policital news and the war in Iraq</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt(the infidel)</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/#comment-236762</link>
		<author>Kurt(the infidel)</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/#comment-236762</guid>
					<description>cording to a Los Angeles Times report appearing on Wednesday, officials in the Bush administration have offered reassurance to Defense Minister Ehud Barak that the US has not necessarily ruled out the option of a military strike on Iran, despite what some in Israel have interpreted as an easing of Washington’s stance toward the Islamic Republic.

----------------------------------------

a military strike on Iran has not been necessarily ruled out. i dont really like the sound of that and i am becoming skeptical that we are going to act fast enough. just found out the other day that Iran has 6,000 centrifuges going which is double what everyone thought they had. makes me wonder what else we dont know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cording to a Los Angeles Times report appearing on Wednesday, officials in the Bush administration have offered reassurance to Defense Minister Ehud Barak that the US has not necessarily ruled out the option of a military strike on Iran, despite what some in Israel have interpreted as an easing of Washington’s stance toward the Islamic Republic.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>a military strike on Iran has not been necessarily ruled out. i dont really like the sound of that and i am becoming skeptical that we are going to act fast enough. just found out the other day that Iran has 6,000 centrifuges going which is double what everyone thought they had. makes me wonder what else we dont know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just posting</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/#comment-236874</link>
		<author>just posting</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/#comment-236874</guid>
					<description>More bad news, http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5477</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More bad news, <a href="http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5477" rel="nofollow">http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5477</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: just posting</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/#comment-236878</link>
		<author>just posting</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/barak-told-strike-on-iran-still-in-cards-us/#comment-236878</guid>
					<description>^ Hopefully the quote in that link is false : "But US officials made it clear that, while prepared to help Israel defend itself against Iranian missile retaliation, they are determined not to be involved in any Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^ Hopefully the quote in that link is false : &#8220;But US officials made it clear that, while prepared to help Israel defend itself against Iranian missile retaliation, they are determined not to be involved in any Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
