<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackwater Getting Out Of Security Business</title>
	<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/</link>
	<description>The latest in policital news and the war in Iraq</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: SOC</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228029</link>
		<author>SOC</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228029</guid>
					<description>Could not have done the job as easily without them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not have done the job as easily without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthuraria</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228045</link>
		<author>Arthuraria</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228045</guid>
					<description>“In my mind, the fundamental question that remains unanswered is this: Why have we come to rely on private contractors to provide combat or combat-related security training for our forces?” Gates wrote in a July 10 memo to the Pentagon’s top military officer, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen.

“Further, are we comfortable with this practice, and do we fully understand the implications in terms of quality, responsiveness and sustainability?”

-------------------

Personally, as a citizen, I am comfortable with whomever can  get the job done in the most effective and efficient manner.    War is never really "cost effective" and the old saying goes that you get what you pay for - which is another reason why are military is also so much better now because we spend so much more money training and equipping them than ever before.

On a side note, speaking about the increased use of private companies in combat and security operations, anyone ever seen the movie "The Mutant Chronicles?"  Classic example of vilification of major corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“In my mind, the fundamental question that remains unanswered is this: Why have we come to rely on private contractors to provide combat or combat-related security training for our forces?” Gates wrote in a July 10 memo to the Pentagon’s top military officer, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen.</p>
<p>“Further, are we comfortable with this practice, and do we fully understand the implications in terms of quality, responsiveness and sustainability?”</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Personally, as a citizen, I am comfortable with whomever can  get the job done in the most effective and efficient manner.    War is never really &#8220;cost effective&#8221; and the old saying goes that you get what you pay for - which is another reason why are military is also so much better now because we spend so much more money training and equipping them than ever before.</p>
<p>On a side note, speaking about the increased use of private companies in combat and security operations, anyone ever seen the movie &#8220;The Mutant Chronicles?&#8221;  Classic example of vilification of major corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ji</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228091</link>
		<author>Ji</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228091</guid>
					<description>They were hired because they could do things the military couldnt. All those rules and regs didnt apply to them. Since when can the DOJ get involved over something that happened in Iraq?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were hired because they could do things the military couldnt. All those rules and regs didnt apply to them. Since when can the DOJ get involved over something that happened in Iraq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ji</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228093</link>
		<author>Ji</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228093</guid>
					<description>Thats why I havent seen the Mutant Chronicles.
The best stuff to come out of Hollywood is SciFi or comic book characters. The rest is garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats why I havent seen the Mutant Chronicles.<br />
The best stuff to come out of Hollywood is SciFi or comic book characters. The rest is garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228126</link>
		<author>Marc</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228126</guid>
					<description>The reason Blackwater and other companies have stepped in to provide personal protective services and logistical support for example, is because the military was gutted and outsourced over the tenure of the Clinton administration without a bat of a lash by the majority Republican Congress.

Jobs many soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines were more than capable of doing and at a relatively minimal cost in comparison to the expense of private contracting, are now being done by civilians. That is just the fact of the matter and there is no reason to bellyache.

Besides, who else are they going to get to do the heavy lifting? Code Pink, Kos, or the rest of the Moon Bat Legions I forgot they are too busy providing material support and comfort for Al-Qaeda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Blackwater and other companies have stepped in to provide personal protective services and logistical support for example, is because the military was gutted and outsourced over the tenure of the Clinton administration without a bat of a lash by the majority Republican Congress.</p>
<p>Jobs many soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines were more than capable of doing and at a relatively minimal cost in comparison to the expense of private contracting, are now being done by civilians. That is just the fact of the matter and there is no reason to bellyache.</p>
<p>Besides, who else are they going to get to do the heavy lifting? Code Pink, Kos, or the rest of the Moon Bat Legions I forgot they are too busy providing material support and comfort for Al-Qaeda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwallu</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228160</link>
		<author>dwallu</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 04:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228160</guid>
					<description>How did they get webb to join code pink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did they get webb to join code pink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBinSTL (just typical)</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228227</link>
		<author>TBinSTL (just typical)</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228227</guid>
					<description>:arrow: dwallu 

How did they get webb to join code pink?

July 21st, 2008 at 8:24 pm 
----------------------------------

He was a "walk on".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://patdollard.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_arrow.gif' alt=':arrow:' class='wp-smiley' /> dwallu </p>
<p>How did they get webb to join code pink?</p>
<p>July 21st, 2008 at 8:24 pm<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>He was a &#8220;walk on&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228449</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228449</guid>
					<description>well, that Eric Prince is a businesses man ;
he understood the marcket ; now, he knows that the opportunities are getting tight in that sort of business.

&lt;i&gt;They were hired because they could do things the military couldnt. &lt;/i&gt; and I would add that the army "code of honor" wouldn't allow either.

Can't see there is something "noble" in that "work" ; though I know that the armies through the centuries had more often hired mercenaries.

y compris, Napoleon : the "Kravat regiments" (Croatians)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, that Eric Prince is a businesses man ;<br />
he understood the marcket ; now, he knows that the opportunities are getting tight in that sort of business.</p>
<p><i>They were hired because they could do things the military couldnt. </i> and I would add that the army &#8220;code of honor&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t allow either.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t see there is something &#8220;noble&#8221; in that &#8220;work&#8221; ; though I know that the armies through the centuries had more often hired mercenaries.</p>
<p>y compris, Napoleon : the &#8220;Kravat regiments&#8221; (Croatians)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Abbott</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228558</link>
		<author>Stephen Abbott</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228558</guid>
					<description>franchie, allow me to suggest you locate a dictionary and look up the word, "mercenary".  A mercenary is one who fights a war for a foreign government.....much like the example in your post.  The private contractors for these companies are not, by definition, mercenaries.

Not only are what they doing noble and honorable, it is necessary as the military just does not have the number of personal to carry out all duties and details that they are tasked to accomplish.

Most of the contractors have advanced, post graduate degrees.  All, have decades and decades of experience, both military and police.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>franchie, allow me to suggest you locate a dictionary and look up the word, &#8220;mercenary&#8221;.  A mercenary is one who fights a war for a foreign government&#8230;..much like the example in your post.  The private contractors for these companies are not, by definition, mercenaries.</p>
<p>Not only are what they doing noble and honorable, it is necessary as the military just does not have the number of personal to carry out all duties and details that they are tasked to accomplish.</p>
<p>Most of the contractors have advanced, post graduate degrees.  All, have decades and decades of experience, both military and police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228603</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/blackwater-getting-out-of-security-business/#comment-228603</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;mer·ce·nar·y (mûrs-nr)
adj.
1. Motivated solely by a desire for monetary or material gain.
2. Hired for service in a foreign army.
n. pl. mer·ce·nar·ies 
1. One who serves or works merely for monetary gain; a hireling.
2. A professional soldier hired for service in a foreign army.&lt;/i&gt;

OK, my interpretation came unfortunately cause I read that these "contractors" also hired  foreign "employees"...
Southern Africa, former french legionnaires....

there were also advertisings in our papers for such jobs

&lt;i&gt;Most of the contractors have advanced, post graduate degrees. All, have decades and decades of experience, both military and police.&lt;/i&gt;

OK, they are not the "stores guards" that we commoly refer to when we think of private contractors Cies, but "professionnals" that also master english language</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>mer·ce·nar·y (mûrs-nr)<br />
adj.<br />
1. Motivated solely by a desire for monetary or material gain.<br />
2. Hired for service in a foreign army.<br />
n. pl. mer·ce·nar·ies<br />
1. One who serves or works merely for monetary gain; a hireling.<br />
2. A professional soldier hired for service in a foreign army.</i></p>
<p>OK, my interpretation came unfortunately cause I read that these &#8220;contractors&#8221; also hired  foreign &#8220;employees&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Southern Africa, former french legionnaires&#8230;.</p>
<p>there were also advertisings in our papers for such jobs</p>
<p><i>Most of the contractors have advanced, post graduate degrees. All, have decades and decades of experience, both military and police.</i></p>
<p>OK, they are not the &#8220;stores guards&#8221; that we commoly refer to when we think of private contractors Cies, but &#8220;professionnals&#8221; that also master english language</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
