“Cooperation Or Confrontation:” U.S. Delivers Ultimatum After Iran Stonewalls At Historic Talks
Agencies:
A U.S. decision to bend policy and sit down with Iran at nuclear talks fizzled Saturday, with Iran stonewalling Washington and five other world powers on their call to freeze uranium enrichment.
Iranians must understand their leaders need to choose between nuclear cooperation or confrontation, which will only lead to further isolation, the US State Department warned Saturday.
The statement from State Department spokesman Sean McCormack came after US Undersecretary of State William Burns joined the international talks with Iran in Geneva in a bid to make Iran suspend sensitive nuclear work.
Burns, it said, delivered a “clear simple message” that Washington was “serious” in backing proposed international incentives for Iran to halt uranium enrichment and that it will only engage in negotiations with Iran when it does so.
The statement added: “We hope the Iranian people understand that their leaders need to make a choice between cooperation, which would bring benefits to all, and confrontation, which can only lead to further isolation.”
In response, the six gave Iran two weeks to respond to their demand, setting the stage for a new round of U.N. sanctions.
Iran’s refusal to consider suspending enrichment was an indirect slap at the United States, which had sent Undersecretary of State William Burns to the talks in hopes the first-time American presence would encourage Tehran into making concessions.
EU envoy Javier Solana said that Iran still has to answer a request made on behalf of the five permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany to “refrain from any new nuclear activity.”
“We have not gotten all the answers to the questions,” Solana told reporters. He said the two-week timeframe was meant to give Iran the space to come up with “the answers that will allow us to continue.”
Keyvan Imani, a member of the Iranian delegation cast doubt over the value of talks less then an hour after they started. “Suspension — there is no chance for that,” he told reporters.
Imani also downplayed the presence of Burns — even though the Americans had previously said they would not talk with the Iranians on nuclear issues unless they were ready to stop all enrichment.
“He is (just) a member of the delegation,” Imani said.
Chief Iranian negotiator Saeed Jalili evaded the issue of suspension, demanded as part of the six-power proposal that carries a commitment of no new U.N. sanctions in exchange for an Iranian pledge to stop expanding its enrichment program.
“Iran is calling on the Western powers to resume the dialogue,” he said.
Iran already is under three sets of U.N. sanctions for its refusal to suspend enrichment, which can generate both nuclear fuel and the fissile material at the core of nuclear warheads. While Tehran says it has a right to enrich for peaceful purposes, the sanctions reflect international concern that it might use its program to make weapons.
The offer delivered to Iranian officials last month by Solana envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment and from their interlocutors to agree to a moratorium on new sanctions for up to six weeks.
That is meant to create the framework for formal negotiations which the six nations hope would secure Iran’s commitment to an indefinite ban on enrichment.
Recent Iranian statements had suggested the country is looking to improve ties with the United States, with officials speaking positively of deliberations by the Bush administration to open an interests section — an informal diplomatic presence — in Tehran after closing its embassy decades ago.
Iran and the United States broke off diplomatic relations after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the hostage crisis at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. Official contacts between the two countries are extremely rare.
Burns’ decision to attend the Geneva talks showed that Washington was willing to accept something less than fully dismantling the program as it had always demanded — at least as a first step.
U.S officials had insisted Burns was at the table to listen only, describing his presence as a one-time occasion. But State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said otherwise.
Burns delivered “a clear simple message” when it was his turn to speak, McCormack told reporters in Washington.
He cited Burns as telling the his Tehran counterpart: “Iran must suspend uranium enrichment to have negotiations involving the United States.”




Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
a guess, soon a red teppish will be requested for the new embassy in Teheran
July 19th, 2008 at 2:15 pmMore fking sanctions? It’s like watching a child play with matches.
July 19th, 2008 at 2:16 pmWhy even think the GD Europeons’ soft diplomacy does anything at all…the friggin’ Germans, Swiss and others will not even quit trading with IRAN…let’s do it and do it big…nuke ‘em!
July 19th, 2008 at 2:43 pmMore wasteful useless rhetoric while Iran moves closer to the bomb. Fuck the Iranians. They are worthless liars.
July 19th, 2008 at 2:46 pmBomb Iran now. Attack and destroy Hizbollah and Hamas now!
i was looking back on all the pages and pages of stories on dealing with Iran last night and im getting very pessimistic to the idea of us EVER doing anything about this problem. my worst fear is that we are going to wait too long and then it will be too late.
lets face the reality here, yes Kim Jong Il of North Korea has nuclear weapons. he has no plans on using them. i believe that to be a fact. Iran on the other hand is lead by people with a very hardcore and screwed up ideology, death cult members who have plans to pro-actively bring on Armageddon. they would not hesitate to use a nuclear weapon. we are really messing with fire here and we need to act soon
July 19th, 2008 at 3:49 pmIs this supposed to be something new? Haven’t we been saying basically this for five years now? Or is it six? I can’t imagine what the world will be like in 3-5 years if Iran is not stopped, but I don’t think it will be pretty.
July 19th, 2008 at 5:16 pmI think the US did this to cover their bases, to say “we exhausted all remedies” in case it hits the fan. I think the US wouldn’t launch (Bush too gun shy with Afghan heating up) but Israel might.
July 19th, 2008 at 7:00 pmEmphasis mine
Gen 16:10 Moreover, the angel of the LORD said to her, “I will greatly multiply your descendants so that they will be too many to count.”
Gen 16:11 The angel of the LORD said to her further, “Behold, you are with child, And you will bear a son; And you shall call his name Ishmael, Because the LORD has given heed to your affliction.
Gen 16:12 “He will be a wild donkey of a man, His hand will be against everyone, And everyone’s hand will be against him; And he will live to the east of all his brothers.”
We will never have peace with these people…. but Gods going to sort it out here himself soon. read Ezekiel chapters 38 and 39, it’s coming.
July 20th, 2008 at 12:11 am