<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time To Put The CIA Spooks Back In The Shadows</title>
	<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/time-to-put-the-cia-spooks-back-in-the-shadows/</link>
	<description>The latest in policital news and the war in Iraq</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 12:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/time-to-put-the-cia-spooks-back-in-the-shadows/#comment-216759</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/time-to-put-the-cia-spooks-back-in-the-shadows/#comment-216759</guid>
					<description>"Most likely, Whitehouse’s concern is with what he perceives as an uptick in anti-American noise from “the man in the foreign street.” Why we should let that “man” determine how we go about obtaining vital information from terrorists is unclear. Perhaps it’s because our need to be “source and subject” stems from a lack of self-confidence that our reticent fathers or grandfathers would have found incomprehensible." 


That man in the foreign street has no determined opinion based on reflexion, but on impressions. It depends on medias to make him change his mind.

The lack of self confidence came with the technology progresses, all the energies foccused (and still do) on the analyses of recolts that machines do.

The human involvments are more difficult to prepare, longer to get ready for operations and have the aleatory factor of a "trahison" (traitor), that the machines don't, also it neads money to get them, the good ones !

If the CIA wants to become the old successful cie, they have to invest on human minds, not only on machines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most likely, Whitehouse’s concern is with what he perceives as an uptick in anti-American noise from “the man in the foreign street.” Why we should let that “man” determine how we go about obtaining vital information from terrorists is unclear. Perhaps it’s because our need to be “source and subject” stems from a lack of self-confidence that our reticent fathers or grandfathers would have found incomprehensible.&#8221; </p>
<p>That man in the foreign street has no determined opinion based on reflexion, but on impressions. It depends on medias to make him change his mind.</p>
<p>The lack of self confidence came with the technology progresses, all the energies foccused (and still do) on the analyses of recolts that machines do.</p>
<p>The human involvments are more difficult to prepare, longer to get ready for operations and have the aleatory factor of a &#8220;trahison&#8221; (traitor), that the machines don&#8217;t, also it neads money to get them, the good ones !</p>
<p>If the CIA wants to become the old successful cie, they have to invest on human minds, not only on machines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franchie</title>
		<link>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/time-to-put-the-cia-spooks-back-in-the-shadows/#comment-216763</link>
		<author>franchie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://patdollard.com/2008/07/time-to-put-the-cia-spooks-back-in-the-shadows/#comment-216763</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;"Most likely, Whitehouse’s concern is with what he perceives as an uptick in anti-American noise from “the man in the foreign street.” Why we should let that “man” determine how we go about obtaining vital information from terrorists is unclear. Perhaps it’s because our need to be “source and subject” stems from a lack of self-confidence that our reticent fathers or grandfathers would have found incomprehensible." &lt;/i&gt;


"That man in the foreign street" has no determined opinion based on reflexions, but on impressions. It depends on medias to make him change his mind.

The lack of self-confidence came with the technology progresses, all the energies foccused (and still do) on the analyse of recolts that machines do.

The human involvments are more difficult to prepare, longer to get ready for operations and have the aleatory factor of a "trahison" (traitor), that the machines don't, also it neads money to get them, the good ones !

If the CIA wants to become the old successful Cie, they have to invest on human minds, not only on machines</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Most likely, Whitehouse’s concern is with what he perceives as an uptick in anti-American noise from “the man in the foreign street.” Why we should let that “man” determine how we go about obtaining vital information from terrorists is unclear. Perhaps it’s because our need to be “source and subject” stems from a lack of self-confidence that our reticent fathers or grandfathers would have found incomprehensible.&#8221; </i></p>
<p>&#8220;That man in the foreign street&#8221; has no determined opinion based on reflexions, but on impressions. It depends on medias to make him change his mind.</p>
<p>The lack of self-confidence came with the technology progresses, all the energies foccused (and still do) on the analyse of recolts that machines do.</p>
<p>The human involvments are more difficult to prepare, longer to get ready for operations and have the aleatory factor of a &#8220;trahison&#8221; (traitor), that the machines don&#8217;t, also it neads money to get them, the good ones !</p>
<p>If the CIA wants to become the old successful Cie, they have to invest on human minds, not only on machines</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
