Comments on: As American Armada Sets Sail For Iran, Iran Lashes Out: “Aggressors Will Not Leave Here Alive”

By: Lee__

Lee__ — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:28:41 +0000

These guys always sound like Baghdad Bob….

By: Marc Stockwell-Moniz

Marc Stockwell-Moniz — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:04:03 +0000

Lee_

These guys always sound like Baghdad Bob….

Maybe that is where he disappeared to.
Did we ever catch him?
Guess he is giving lessons in Iran.

By: DC

DC — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:04:12 +0000

Yea, they got their “taqyya” going.

By: Kurt(the infidel)

Kurt(the infidel) — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:28:34 +0000

well either way i dont see us “invading” Iran. well not with soldiers at least. we probably will take over their airspace and probably put some spec ops on the ground to mark targets. but they cant stop us, we will gain air superiority in about 3 or 4 hours. what they will do in response is anyones guess. but general Baghdad Bob can keep running his pisser until the cows come home (or is it goats come home?) and it will make zero difference. IMO

By: London Calling

London Calling — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:40:00 +0000

Iran with nuclear weapons is a scary prospect admittedly, but invade Iran? Please don’t!

By: tedders

tedders — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:31:17 +0000

London Calling, maybe you should reserve your “Please don’t!” for Iran and her defiance of the world community.

By: tedders

tedders — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:36:36 +0000

You’ve got to see this, Ahhhckmed Dinnerjacket crying, he must realize the coalition naval forces that are on the way to destroy his “peaceful” nuclear projects.

You have to download a .wmv file.

http://digg.com/politics/REAL_Iranian_President_cries_and_slaps_himself_in_concert

By: USNA1985

USNA1985 — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:38:21 +0000

“The enemies will not pull out of the region alive if they dare to invade”

Didn’t Saddam say something like this before the first and the current gulf war? These guys just don’t get it, or are afraid to achnowledge reality. But then again, maybe they are hoping the Dem’s win in November and they get a repeat of Carter’s failed attempts.

Damn that’s a good looking ‘boat’ by the way!!

By: Marc Stockwell-Moniz

Marc Stockwell-Moniz — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:47:34 +0000

London Calling:

Iran with nuclear weapons is a scary prospect admittedly, but invade Iran? Please don’t!

Step aside Mother Country, let the big boys (The U.S. and Mighty Israel) do the job.
You just worry about So. Iraq, if in fact you can still even handle that. Capish?

By: Kurt(the infidel)

Kurt(the infidel) — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:59:56 +0000

London Calling

i dont think an invasion is likely at all. their airspace will be pretty damn busy soon though.

By: 83delta

83delta — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:02:23 +0000

Ataollah Salehi… Assume the position you unshaven, unclean pig ….

Yo daddy be comin to cap yo ass. (little obama lingo)
Ya’ll almost made it to the elections—-toooo baddd

By: Mike Mose

Mike Mose — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 18:41:38 +0000

Iran will not have a military or a nuclear sector very soon.

Will Russia be in place for a power grab of oil fields?

By: trapper

trapper — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 21:19:41 +0000

lets see how the russian weaponary works this time! :roll:this time if we see a russian convoy trying to get out of the country, eliminate it!

By: T-Bagg

T-Bagg — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 22:28:51 +0000

“The enemies will not pull out of the region alive if they dare to invade the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Major-General Salehi said as he addressed a group of Iranian military attachés who had gathered in Tehran on Tuesday.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vfSk-6tIvo&feature=related

By: London Calling

London Calling — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:08:52 +0000

Marc Stockwell-Moniz
Kurt(the infidel)

No one, least of all me, is doubting that you can flatten the place if you so desired. But tell me, is that the wise thing to do? Are there not other solutions to the problem? “Because you can” is not a moral argument.

By: TBinSTL (just typical)

TBinSTL (just typical) — Sat, 23 Aug 2008 23:35:49 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u05Qot_yh9c

London Calling
Negotiating has worked so very well, I’m thinking your carrot needs some stick behind it.

By: sully

sully — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 00:45:51 +0000

London Calling:

“Because you can” is not a moral argument.

You’re new here? We’ve already concluded the balance of the “moral argument”…. that they deserve it.
Got a moral argument of your own we can discuss?

By: Brian H

Brian H — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:58:43 +0000

London;
I’ll make this slow and easy for you:

What Iran wants is time. The more “negotiations” it can keep floating, the more time it gets. Israel knows it cannot afford to allow time for a functioning A-bomb to be put together. Neither can the US. Maybe London would accept a ship-nuke detonating in its harbour, but Americans have had about enough of explosive surprise visits.

By: One Shot

One Shot — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:15:23 +0000

If we zap them, expect Iranian agents to do everything they can to upset our food supply, water supply, oil supply, release of biotoxins to cattle, etc, etc. They may even use some their nuclear material for other types of chaos via terrorist attacks. At that point, they will do whatever it takes.

These fucksticks won’t play nice. But, they must be stopped as soon as possible.

By: Marc Stockwell-Moniz

Marc Stockwell-Moniz — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:58:22 +0000

London Calling:

There is nothing moral about Israel being threatened with destruction daily, especially if Iran gets nukes.
No more Chamberlains.

By: TBinSTL (just typical)

TBinSTL (just typical) — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:06:59 +0000

One Shot

I’m guessing that getting “eyes on” with those types is why this hasn’t happened already.

By: Mike F

Mike F — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:39:42 +0000

Let the games begin!

By: 31Mike

31Mike — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:52:02 +0000

Personally i’m fucking fed up with this back and forth shit with Iran.

They’ve been killing our Troops for at least two years, if not more. They know it and we know it.

These are our fathers, our brothers, our sons.

It’s long past the time to shut them the fuck up !!!!

Just like we did with Kadhafi, but a hell of a lot worse.

Mr. President…Get this done before you leave office. You owe it to our Fallen Warriors. The men who Gave All for their country.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:13:00 +0000

Honestly this is probably not a good thing in my opinion, fuck Iran, but invade them now? why? they haven’t done anything differently than they have in the last couple of years? So what’s changed? I personally think you guys are going to argue for invading for invadings sake…

By: Gaige Mosher

Gaige Mosher — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:31:53 +0000

Andrew

We’re not going to “invade” them. There will be no mass incursion into Iranian territory with the intention of taking and holding territory, nor an occupation. AT MOST, you might see armor units making very fast hit and run missions into the Iranian border-lands, like the Thunder Runs into Baghdad back in ‘03, but on the brigade level.

What WILL happen is a deluge of cruise missiles, JDAMS of every size dropped from every altitude from both land and carrier-launched aircraft, including high-altitude AA defense suppression by stealth aircraft and, possibly but not certainly, the usage of bunker-busting tactical nuclear weapons.

By: TBinSTL (just typical)

TBinSTL (just typical) — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:50:18 +0000

Gaige Mosher
Do you happen to know if the rocket assisted penetrator bombs are on line yet? That would make the nuke option less likely to be needed.

By: displaced Ched Head

displaced Ched Head — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:00:51 +0000

I do not wish to speak for anyone else but I think london calling was refering to an all out boots on the ground invasion.
That is unnecessary, we already did that and that bridge head is solid, it’s currently called Iraq.
Controlling airspace and movement in and around the country is a different story. That can be accomplished from the air and sea. That is what we are about to witness if Igotmeaneedforajihad doesn’t back down and un-fuck himself.
Locking down that country for a month or so would bring it to it’s knees. They are already in the midst of a sustained depression. 23% unemployment makes alot of people cranky.

I think that is what people here are saying.
Besides wouldn’t it be grand as a show to the Commies in Georgia as we sign an agreement with Ukraine to deploy missiles ala Poland!!!

By: Gaige Mosher

Gaige Mosher — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:01:35 +0000

TBinSTL (just typical)

I may be wrong, but I believe they’ve been online for a year now or more now. I can’t recall the specific documentation, but it was an Air Force press release analyzed by credible online sources, Defense Tech or Popular Mechanics.

By: displaced Ched Head

displaced Ched Head — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 06:06:24 +0000

As an addendum to my last comment, libtards lose The Peoples House and Pooty Poot has to deal with McCain for eight years which means we cut our oil imports to about 25%, which in turn leaves Russia without a cashflow and guess what, We win the second cold war as well.
Do you want to get on board london? Or are you content to kibitz from the sideline and tsk tsk about moral equivalence after the heavy lifting is done.

By: London Calling

London Calling — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 13:37:06 +0000

Tedders – I don’t want Iran to have a nuclear capability as much as you don’t, but I don’t think the US unilaterally invading Iran is the right solution.

Marc Stockwell-Moniz – Looking at the photos of you on your website, you look as if you’ve been “handling” too many pies. Capish?

Kurt(the infidel) – You’re getting closer here I think. I’m not against a bit a sabre rattling to emphasise a point.

Mike Mose – This is exactly the kind of thing I mean by “please don’t invade Iran”. There will be folk in Russia trying to argue that they have to respond. You might solve the problem of Iran, but cause huge headaches elsewhere.

TBinSTL – Don’t give in so easily. No silver bullets here mate.

Sully – How’s this for a moral argument? An all out assault on Iran by the USA would probably only last a few days, like it did in Iraq. None of your territory will be in the slightest danger. But aren’t there other states around the world who also “deserve it”? Russia? China? How would your “solution” work then? As I said, “because you can” is not a moral argument.

Brian H. - Of course I want none of this. I just want the US foreign policy to be lighter on its feet. Only fight when you absolutely have to.

Marc Stockwell-Moniz – Are you saying it’s not possible to make the opposite mistake to Chamberlain and go to war when you don’t need to?