7 Responses

  1. ROB

    Of course, 3 months ago these same liberals were saying we should get out because the Mahdi Army wasn’t a serious threat, and that it had Iraq’s best interests at heart.

  2. ji

    My protector is my enemy.

  3. mike3481

    :arrow: ROB

    Exactly.

  4. TJ (Honorary Lesbian)

    If they are the mahdi army and al sadr is their leader then shouldnt he be brought up on war crimes? :???:

  5. Marc Stockwell-Moniz

    How appropriate that the house of Satin, a mosque, was being used as a torture and killing camp.

    Islam sucks. :gun: :twisted:
    Death to Islam the false religion. :gun: :twisted: Mohammed was a pedaphile. :gun: :twisted:

  6. billie (Today I'm a Georgian)

    Makes you wonder how many mosques are used for similar purposes. To a radical Muslim, there are no boundaries.

    Why was the reporter wearing a veil? Out of respect for the mosque? I visited a mosque in Iran once but wasn’t allowed in until I put on a veil. However, veils were not mandatory on the streets at that time.

    Or wouldn’t the Muslim men have talked to the reporter without a veil?

    If it’s because of the first reason…let the readers fill in the blank.

  7. Knottie

    Anyone that is shocked or surprised by this is a full blown idiot.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: :beer: