Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.
If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.
To the Lawyer in the video, Mark Potok:
Dear Mark, you’re in idiot.
The White Supremacists know Obama is a Marxist and if elected with a high enough Democrat margin in Congress, Obama will try to shove his brand of Socialism / Communism down America’s throat so he can carve out a, well, Kingdom for himself and his buddies. (after all, in the end, isn’t that what it’s all about for them)
Which might or would trigger a Second American Revolution and in the twisted minds of White Supremacists, the African-American Community would share as much of the blame for what’s happened as Obama and the Lefty Dems. in Congress
Now Mark, you might not actually be an idiot. You may just be trying to distract people away from what many (if not all) of us Conservatives already know about Obama.
If your confused reread my first paragraph.
PS - good luck man, you’re going to need it, but it still won’t do any good.

August 30th, 2008 at 7:50 pmWhat happened to wanting to kill the black president? I remember the KKK saying that “someone will kill Obama”. Now they’re probably donating to his campaign.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:59 pmMSNBC really has sunk to the sludge at the bottom of the out house hole.
August 30th, 2008 at 11:30 pmMike3481, I don’t think the lawyer is a white supremacist, he’s just reporting on what their trends are. The last thing he says is that it’s “absolute fantasy on their part”.
Did I read your post wrong?
August 31st, 2008 at 5:22 amYes and no.
Yes, I wasn’t saying the liberal, capitalism hating lawyer Mark Potok is a white supremacist.
He’s a closet Marxist who’ll do darn near anything he can to help elect Hussein.
………………………….
And No because I assumed, wrongly, that this lawyer and the “journalist” were telling the truth about the “survey”.
What most likely happened is what I call a “Michael Moore”, which is where you take the result you want, then cherry-pick data proving the (false) result.
I should have taken the above into account when writing my first post.
Thanks for keeping me on my toes.

August 31st, 2008 at 11:07 am