Obama: Up to 1/3 Of Iraq Troops To Remain Past 2010

February 27th, 2009 (8) Posted By .

400http-dyimgcom-a-p-ap-20090227-capt2f12e370ff094a19b5976779b760b24eobama_iraq_ncgb104.jpg

Fox News:

President Obama, declaring there is “renewed cause for hope in Iraq,” on Friday announced his plan to end combat operations in Iraq by August of next year.

“Let me say this as plainly as I can. By August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end,” Obama told Marines at Camp Lejeune, N.C.

Obama said that the situation in Iraq is not yet secure and violence will drag on in the months ahead, but that the goal of a “sovereign, stable and self-reliant” Iraq is achievable in the near future.

Obama, who is preparing to escalate U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, will order the immediate draw-down of the 142,000 Marines and Army personnel in Iraq and wants combat brigades out by Aug. 31 of next year.

Obama said U.S. troops have for six years fought to give Iraqis a chance for a better future, and that, “Now we must ask the Iraqi people to seize it.”

Though the president pledged a withdrawal timeline of 16 months during the campaign, his plan would take about 19 months from the day he took office.

The president will also order U.S. military commanders to leave a residual force of between 35,000 and 50,000 troops in Iraq. Under the Status of Forces Agreement with the Iraqi government, the U.S. must remove all military personnel by Dec. 31, 2011.

The move reflects the consensus plan presented to Obama by Defense Secretary Robert Gates; Army Gen. Ray Odierno, the top military commander in Iraq; Army Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command; Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and the president’s top intelligence officials.

The president will order all U.S. troops to focus their efforts on advising, equipping and training Iraqi security forces as well as assisting in reconstruction and political reconciliation.

“We will complete this transition to Iraqi responsibility, and we will bring our troops home with the honor that they have earned,” Obama said Friday.

Obama’s decision reflects his belief that “there have been real advances” in the country and, as result, the U.S. military should now be ordered to carry out “a fundamental change in mission,” senior administration officials said.

Though the size of the residual force drew criticism from some Democrats, key Republicans, including House Minority Leader John Boehner and former presidential nominee John McCain, voiced support for the president’s overall plan.

“Given the gains in Iraq and the requirements to send additional troops to Afghanistan, together with the significant number of troops that will remain in Iraq and the president’s willingness to reassess based on conditions on the ground, I am cautiously optimistic that the plan as laid out by the president can lead to success,” McCain said.

The president reached his decision after 12 advisory group meetings on Iraq and 10 inter-agency meetings since Inauguration Day. The first Iraq advisory meeting occurred at the White House Jan. 21.

Obama spoke by telephone with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki on Friday aboard Air Force One to discuss his plan, according to White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, who said Obama also phoned former President George W. Bush “as a courtesy” once he landed.

Obama also made his first official reference Friday to Christopher Hill’s appointment as the new ambassador to Iraq, replacing Ryan Crocker. Hill was Bush’s chief negotiator with North Korea.

The president decided to order the troop withdrawals on Wednesday. He told lawmakers Thursday the troops remaining in Iraq after Aug. 31, 2010, will carry out new missions and will be trained and organized in a way that de-emphasizes combat-readiness. They will instead focus on training, equipping and advising Iraqi security forces; conducting targeted counter-terrorism missions; and protecting the ongoing civilian and military efforts in Iraq.

To underscore the president’s desire to end combat and counter-insurgency missions, officials said after Aug. 31, 2010, there will be no brigade combat teams in Iraq. There are 14 brigade combat teams in Iraq now. The remaining troops will be “reconstituted,” officials said, into “advisory and assistance brigades.”

Even so, if security conditions in Iraq deteriorate in the coming months the president “retains the flexibility” to slow down or reverse troop withdrawals. Officials said Obama’s drawn-down is unlikely to jeopardize security gains achieved as a result of the Bush administration surge that has seen a significant reduction in terrorist-inspired and insurgent-led violence in Iraq.

A portion of the 35,000 to 50,000 remaining troops will be combat-ready and will be ready to deploy in counter-terrorism missions. That means combat operations are still possible, even after Aug. 31, 2010, an official said. Senior officials would not say how large the counter-terrorism force will be, but said it would be well under half the remaining troop strength.

U.S. troops will begin leaving Iraq this spring and the numbers of returning troops will grow during the summer, officials said. A sizable number of troops will remain in Iraq, however, to provide security and training as the country prepares for regional and sub-regional elections this spring and national elections in December.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • Deathstar

    At least the shit fucking monkey gets somethings partially right. Broken clocks are correct twice a day.

  • wutakrock

    Isn’t this old news anyway? GW already had a plan to significantly lower the troops in Iraq at the end of 2010. He is just reaffirming what we already knew. What was news to me was how Obama stated that the violence in Iraq was way down due to our forces. I thought we were just air raiding villages and that the war was lost.

  • Jerry

    Unfortunately I heard some of this address to the Marines, and he put in the suggestion of the civilian defense force… Sounds like more details will be forthcoming.

  • vehement

    We heard about McBush for so long, but atleast McCain was partially credited in the name. This administration of Clintbush shows just how little change has come with the Messiah of Hope.

  • Hawkerdriver(Piss on the Koran)

    I heard the clever insertion of the brownshirts policy too.He’s a slick one.I also saw/heard a lot of young Marines drinking kool-aid too.He really softened them up with empty promises.I hope these kids can think outside of the sales pitch…and thier officers can hold CIC to his word.

    The man also acknowledged the success of the Surge…Something he vehemently opposed during the campaign.He could have garnered a little respect if he had admitted he was wrong there.

    Seems like this guy is on TV WAY too much. :???:

  • http://www.yankeemom.com yankeemom

    “Seems like this guy is on TV WAY too much.”
    I wholeheartedly agree. He just needs that constant adulation. I guess it gets lonely in the Oval Office having to actually deal with reality.
    What fried me about that speech – well, fried me the most, because so much of it did – was the big deal he made about the pay raise he was blessing our Military with. He just forgot to mention that it’s only 2.9% in 2010.

    Let’s look at 2009: 3.9%
    How about 2008: 3.5%

    Yep, he’s taking care of the Military, he is!

  • Bob

    I watched part of his address to the troops. They did not look to happy to be there. Obama had that stupid look on his face. “I’m your boss now and you will do as I say”

    I hope the military is ready if Chairman Obama tries taking this country down.

  • hegelbot

    SO a friend of mine was Wooting about Obamas troop withdrawal. I was pissed. Then i actually heard the address a realized just how powerful the kool aid is. Unless i am mistaken Obamas plan is strangely similar to bush’s particularly when considers that for all intents and purposes the “war in Iraq” as the media likes to call it has fizzled out, oh yeah and we won. Gradual draw down, leaving 30-50k troops behind and keeping the option of redeployment open even after to so called total removal in 2012 or when ever he suggested.

    Oh boy change and hope is following the advice of Robert Gates and keeping to the course. Fucking idiots, i think Obama could propose water boarding and libtards would gobble it up.