The Audacity Of Primates In US Publications

Al Sharpton vs. NY Post here.

The WaPo (on the heels of the NY Post’s “monkey business”) preemptively apologizes for some obscure insult a cartoon depiction of an “ape” may cause someone … anyone … in this country that might believe it to be a caricature of someone (perhaps in a government office?) … I think.
The apology:
WaPo:
Editor’s Note
The headline, illustration and text of “Below the Beltway,” a column in The Washington Post Magazine today, may cause offense to readers. The magazine was printed before a widely publicized incident last week in which a chimpanzee attacked and badly mauled a woman in Stamford, Conn. In addition, the image and text inadvertently may conjure racial stereotypes that The Post does not countenance. We regret the lapse.
The article with cartoon:

WaPo:
Monkey Business
The good news for men: Women love apes
In a study described recently in the New York Times, men and women were shown various types of sexually explicit videos, and sensors were attached to their private parts to measure their physical arousal. The subjects were also asked to rate their degree of arousal themselves.
The study found that men were completely predictable: Straight men reported they were turned on only by images of women, and the machine confirmed that. Same with gay men and images of men. But while women of both orientations reported similarly gender-specific responses, the machine called them liars. The sensors reported that all women were turned on by absolutely everything … including videos of bonobos having sex. Bonobos are apes.
The Times treated this as social anthropology. The story droned on for what seemed like 200 pages and wrestled with grave epistemological issues involving the Cartesian nexus of mind and body. I opted instead for a few minutes on the phone with my friend Gina Barreca, the feminist scholar …
(Continue reading, but the non-controversy is more about the cartoon)






This whole controversy is offensive to monkeys. They should sue the WaPo too.
WTF???
Who in the fuck thought attaching sensors to “private parts” to see whether anybody was aroused by apes or any other animal was meaningful or a good idea?
And who the fuck paid for the ‘testing’? Taxpayers?
Fuck!
So if I have the story straight both cartoonist could have, or even should have, used that skank, Pelosi instead of the Obama looking monkey. Right?
New name for the Obamama Stimulus: Monkey Madness