Suing The Federal Government
Mar 24, 2009 54 Comments ›› Pat Dollard
Click here for previous “Deep Thoughts”
For those of you who are new to the site, “Pat Dollard’s The Jihadi Killer Hour” broadcasts live on Blog Talk Radio every Sunday at 8 PM PST, 10 PM CST, and 11 PM EST. Here’s Your Direct Links To All Recent “The Jihadi Killer Hour” Shows:

Glitter Girl Says: “A day without Pat Dollard is like a day without blood on your hands.”
Jenny-O Says: “A day without Pat Dollard is like a day without my brass.”
Follow Pat Dollard, Active, and “The Jihadi Killer Hour” on Twitter.
03:57
This is from Snooper at the Snooper Report, an esteemed blogger, activist and dedicated member of the Dollard Nation and Active. This has the feel of one possible initial campaign for Active. The idea could be expanded on, as they could be sued for many things, including treason during the Iraq war. Let me know your thoughts.
The Snooper Report:
FIGHT BACK WITH NO MERCY
The other day, I had an idea and in the hopes that it would not die alone, I decided to actually go and see if it was a good idea. That’s the funny thing about ideas. You never know if it is good or not unless you seek council.
My idea was this. Seeing that the anti-Americanists have managed to subvert the judiciary in this nation to the extent that more unconstitutional laws have been passed than constitutional ones, I was wondering if we could use the courts to reverse that trend. One never knows.
So, I went to my attorney that I have used for years for many things and made an appointment for one of those 30-minute free consultations. I presented my idea/desire to my attorney and that 30-minute free consultation lasted more than two hours.
I went armed with facts and data. I took my notes. I took my laptop with the “go anywhere” internet card just in case. I also had everything downloaded onto a zip drive and left it with the firm and they were eager and happy to have the data.
My idea was this. What is the feasibility of suing the congress as a whole and each representative and senator individually for violating the United States Constitution? I was asked what I would settle for. I instantly recognized the question was really how much money I was looking for. I told them that I was not seeking damages in a monetary settlement. I was demanding that either the United States Federal Government either return to our Constitutional Republic or make the changes they wanted to make by constitutional amendments instead of passing federal laws which made the path clear for legislating around the Constitution.
Like I said, over two hours later, I witnessed six lawyers getting on board with the idea.









