Home  »  General  »  Beware The Cult Of Obama

Beware The Cult Of Obama



Mar 31, 2009 11 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

space_hippies

Washington Examiner:

By Gene Healy

You’ve met them. They may be friends of yours, or family members. You may even be one of them (in which case you’ll hate this column). I’m referring to those who’ve heard the Call of Obama.

Tucker Carlson compares it to a dog whistle: Inaudible to most, but irresistible to those who can hear it.

Obama “walks into a room and you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere,” George Clooney gushed to Charlie Rose.

“I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make [Obama’s] pathway clear,” Halle Berry recently told the Philadelphia Daily News, “I’ll do whatever he says.” (Does Michelle know about this?)

Hollywood stars aren’t known for their political wisdom. More disturbing is how starstruck the mainstream media has become. Hardball host Chris Matthews isn’t the only one who gets a “thrill” up his leg at the very thought of our new president.

Last summer, San Francisco Chronicle columnist Mark Morford wrote that “Many spiritually advanced people I know … identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who … can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet.”

The Politico recently ran a 900-word article entitled “The Power of Obama’s Hand,” reverentially describing how the president “uses touch to control and console simultaneously,” laying hands on supporters and opponents alike.

And in February, author Judith Warner used her New York Times blog to confess that “The other night I dreamt of Barack Obama. He was taking a shower right when I needed to get into the bathroom to shave my legs.”

Instead of keeping that information to herself, Warner “launched an email inquiry,” which revealed that “many women—not too surprisingly—were dreaming about sex with the president.” Those of us who like to point out that the Emperor has no clothes now have to worry that when we do, we may give rise to a new round of lurid cougar fantasies.

Conservatives like to think they’re above this sort of thing. Their attitude is summed up by the subtitle of Jerome Corsi’s recent bestseller: Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality.

But any conservative who thinks cultishness is exclusively a leftist phenomenon ought to take a good long look in the mirror. Because many of those who decry the “cult of Obama” are the same people who made a flight-suited action figure hero out of such common clay as George W. Bush.

Peggy Noonan called Bush’s post-9/11 address to Congress “a God-touched moment and a God-touched speech.” Fred Barnes wrote that “the stage was set for Bush to be God’s agent of wrath.” National Review Online ran ads for the Bush “Top Gun” action figure, and an article about how wonderful it was to have a presidential superhero to complement your GI Joe collection.

On Hardball, after the “Mission Accomplished” speech, G. Gordon Liddy got graphic enough to embarrass Judith Warner: “Here comes George Bush. You know, he’s in his flight suit, he’s striding across the deck, and he’s wearing his parachute harness…. and it makes the best of his manly characteristic…. He has just won every woman’s vote in the United States of America!”

Presidential cultishness can be found all across the political spectrum. It’s a pathology that needs to be rooted out, because when we swoon over the man who holds the office, we risk making the presidency far more powerful than it was ever intended to be.

William Hazlitt, the 19th-century English essayist, argued that man was by nature “a worshipper of idols and a lover of kings.” As savages, Hazlitt wrote, we fashioned “gods of wood and stone and brass,” but now, thinking ourselves above superstition, “we make kings of common men, and are proud of our own handiwork.”

But America’s very existence repudiates the idea that we’re hard-wired for leader-worship. We became a nation by throwing off a king, and our Founders gave us a Constitution that’s based on the notion that all men are flawed and none should be trusted with too much power.

Americans, of all people, should recognize how bizarre and dangerous it is to fawn over professional politicians.

Examiner columnist Gene Healy is a vice president at the Cato Institute and the author of The Cult of the Presidency.


  • TerryTate

    :arrow: Last summer, San Francisco Chronicle columnist Mark Morford wrote that “Many spiritually advanced people I know … identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who … can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet.”

    ===============================================================

    Uh yeah Mr. Morford. They had your kind a short time ago. They thought they were advanced people also. They thought they could usher in a new way of being also. Maybe you’ve heard of them, they were called the SS. They were Nazi’s. Looks like you are one too.

    Just so you know though, that didn’t work out so well for them.

    • http://earthlink nomee1

      CORRECT THEY WERE NAZIS. SOUNDS A LOT LIKE OBAMBI LIBS TODAY :lol: :lol:

  • scott_free

    Why do we listen to celebrities? is it Eletism?
    People like Sean Penn, Dustin Hoffman, George Clooney, Oprah Winfrey, just to
    name a few, on topics like politics, moral issues, America issues, are they any
    more informed then we are? most have not even finished high school, let alone
    collage, is it because we put them at such high esteem? or because they make so
    much money? they might be good or even great actors, but does that give them
    more of a voice, have we put money and celebrity-hood at a higher value in our
    society? they seem to be more isolated from the majority of the rest of us,
    limos, Fancy/expensive parties,Mansions (global warming ha) award ceremonies to
    honor them self’s, and money does not seem to be an issue with multi-million
    dollar salaries, body guards (no wonder why they are anti 2nd amendment) and
    from a morality point of view they certainly change partners much more often
    (marriage means nothing to them thats why they support gay marriage), it also
    seems that if they do not hold up to there liberal standards getting work could
    be difficult for them. Is it just me or should we just stop listening to them
    and let them get back to what they do best ACTING and not ACTING like they know
    any better than we do about right and wrong or how to live our lives and how to
    vote, shouldn’t we vote for what is right for us and not what they think is good
    for us , just a thought. and leave us to our faith, moral values, and our
    convictions on the founding of this great country.
    Is that not why we fled from slavery, tyranny of monarchies of kings and queens?
    If not then, maybe we should just say no to there movies and seek our
    entertainment else where… Just a Thought.
    Rock This Vote! (And get off the kool-aid)

    • Sully

      Maybe the same reason people gawk at a bad car wreck?

    • AFITgrad86

      It has been theorized that because we have no royalty we must create our own and do so via celebrity. I don’t necessarily agree with that theory but it does help explain the phenomenon.

      Actually, if you think about it does a Duke or a Prince have a higher intellect making their opinions matter more than the common man? I think not. But what they do have (and share with celebrities) is the ability to shape opinion because they have access to an audience.

      The common man may have much more refined ideas than a Hollywood personality or the son of a Sheik, but they can not communicate that idea effectively because they have no access to the media. Take Joe the Plumber as an example. He speaks the same thoughts many of us have had .. what differentiates him is that he was given an opportunity to express those thoughts in a public forum that was seen by millions.

      My complaint with the Hollywood types is their intellectual elitism … they think that (only) they are capable of deep thought and that (only) their opinions are the ones that matter. Those who disagree are uninformed, evil, or not important.

  • Ji

    For those without a God, he is their god.
    Did you notice it is the anti-Christian god haters, who adore him.

    • MinneSoCold

      :!: BINGO :!: We have a winner!

    • Lock and Load

      :arrow: Ji
      I hate to tell you, but there are a whole lot of very touchy-feely committed liberal Christians who are also jumping on the bandwagon :roll: Yes, there is such a thing as a liberal Christian, and they are usually on the libtard side of every argument, including global warming, war protesting etc, etc. I know waaaaaay too many of these people, and in a supposedly God-fearing environment, it is very strange :shock: :roll: :???:

  • http://themameluke.blogspot.com The Mameluke

    A lot of German women wanted to have Hitler’s babies, too.

  • http://www.dirtydozensbunker.com Sanders

    Socrates warned us about giving credence to artists, poets, and actors.

  • forward. observer.

    The fawning over Obama is scary. Take this quote for example… “How many look up to him with touching faith as their helper, their savior, their deliverer from unbearable distress.” Oh no, that’s not an Obama voter or a MSM anchor… It’s a Hamburg school teacher in 1932 talking about Hitler. I saw it painted on the wall of the new propaganda exhibit at the Holocaust Museum.