Home  »  General  »  No Senior Discount With Sharia Law

No Senior Discount With Sharia Law



Mar 9, 2009 7 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

42-16194592

CNN:

A Saudi Arabian court has sentenced a 75-year-old Syrian woman to 40 lashes, four months imprisonment and deportation from the kingdom for having two unrelated men in her house, according to local media reports.

According to the Saudi daily newspaper Al-Watan, troubles for the woman, Khamisa Mohammed Sawadi, began last year when a member of the religious police entered her house in the city of Al-Chamli and found her with two unrelated men, “Fahd” and “Hadian.”

Fahd told the policeman that he had the right to be there, because Sawadi had breast-fed him as a baby and was therefore considered to be a son to her in Islam, according to Al-Watan. Fahd, 24, added that his friend Hadian was escorting him as he delivered bread for the elderly woman. The policeman then arrested both men.

Saudi Arabia follows a strict interpretation of Islam called Wahhabism and punishes unrelated men and women who are caught mingling.

The Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice, feared by many Saudis, is made up of several thousand religious policemen charged with duties such as enforcing dress codes, prayer times and segregation of the sexes. Under Saudi law, women face many restrictions, including a strict dress code and a ban on driving. Women also need to have a man’s permission to travel.

Al Watan obtained the court’s verdict and reported that it was partly based on the testimony of the religious police. In his ruling, the judge said it had been proved that Fahd is not the Sawadi’s son through breastfeeding.

The court also doled out punishment to the two men. Fahd was sentenced to four months in prison and 40 lashes; Hadian was sentenced to six months in prison and 60 lashes. In a phone call with Al Watan, the judge declined to comment and suggested the newspaper review the case with the Ministry of Justice.

Sawadi told the newspaper that she will appeal, adding that Fahd is indeed her son through breastfeeding.

The case has sparked anger in Saudi Arabia.

“It’s made everybody angry because this is like a grandmother,” Saudi women’s rights activist Wajeha Al-Huwaider told CNN. “Forty lashes — how can she handle that pain? You cannot justify it.”

This is not the first Saudi court case to cause controversy.

In 2007, a 19-year-old gang-rape victim in the Saudi city of Qatif was sentenced to 200 lashes and six months in prison for meeting with an unrelated male. The seven rapists, who had abducted the woman and man, received sentences ranging from 10 months to five years in prison. The case sparked international outrage and Saudi King Abdullah subsequently pardoned the “Qatif Girl” and the unrelated male.

Many Saudis are hopeful that the Ministry of Justice will be reformed. Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz announced in February a major Cabinet reshuffling in which many hard-line conservatives, including the head of the commission, were dismissed and replaced with younger, more moderate members.

The new appointments represented the largest shakeup since King Abdullah took power in 2005 and were welcomed in Saudi Arabia as progressive moves on the part of the king, whom many see as a reformer. Among ministers who’ve been replaced is the minister of justice.

The actions of the religious police have come under increased scrutiny in Saudi Arabia recently, as more and more Saudis urge that the commission’s powers be limited. Last week, the religious police detained two male novelists for questioning after they tried to get the autograph of a female writer, Halima Muzfar, at a book fair in Riyadh, the capital of the kingdom.

“This is the problem with the religious police,” added Al-Huwaider, “watching people and thinking they’re bad all the time. It has nothing to do with religion. It’s all about control. And the more you spread fear among people, the more you control them. It’s giving a bad reputation to the country.”


  • CDTFLINT

    She got what she deserved. How dare she meet someone not related to her. It’s an abomination./sarcasm

    It’s amazing how far they’ve come from the stone age….wait, they’re still in the stone age.

  • Mike Mose

    Were is the Liberal outrage??????!!!!

    Idiots………..

  • BK

    “It’s giving a bad reputation to the country.”

    The understatement of the millennium!!!

  • Alice Paul

    “Where is the liberal outrage?” I’ll tell you where, they won’t march around with signs for causes they deem “uncool” That’s where. I’ve seen their partisan b.s. up close and personal. There is an article about Sharia Banks in NYC this week…and it’s all good with them. If you stand for rights for everyone then STAND you hypocrites!! Or shut up because I don’t believe a thing you say. I’m an ex dem and I’m never going back to that b.s. Once your eyes are opened to having been USED and not having any rights at all when it so suits them you DO tend to get a clue.

    Where is Obama on this issue? No where. He hasn’t got the fortitude to take a stand when it might not play to his peeps. The commander in thief is also a hypocrite.

  • Dan (San Diego)

    :arrow: Mike Mose

    I’m stirring it up here at work…..I email all these stories to the women in my office. Before I began doing this they were all clueless.
    Now one of them is changing her major……..to help combat this problem.
    My point is that the reason there is no outrage, even from women’s groups, is because these western women have no fucking idea this is even going on. Most of them have their heads in the sand.
    :arrow: Dollard ladies of course I’m excluding you. so don’t get uppity with me. :lol:

  • Alice Paul

    American women would mostly be surprised by the crap going on in their own country too. Sheeple sit in front of the t.v. and believe everything spoon fed to them. That’s how Bambi got away with everything he’s done. NOW people are up in arms? NOW there is concern, and doubt and outrage and oh the media are slightly releasing some of the negatives on him that have been well known for years.

    Spreading these stories is the only way to wake America up from her slumber. This man is a sham and a threat to our constitution. He was SELECTED by his disgusting sugar daddy Soros. We did not even have an election in any sense of that word. No wonder Chavez loves Obama.

    Dan…lmao..nice quantifier…nobody is going to get “uppity” with you…lol.

  • TedB

    While the content of the story, regrettably, does not surprise me, the messenger does; CNN? Not who I would expect to report on such things.