Home  »  General  »  Not Marxist Enough: The Left’s New Anti-Obama

Not Marxist Enough: The Left’s New Anti-Obama



Mar 29, 2009 36 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

Politico:

A stark image of Paul Krugman, the bearded New York Times op-ed columnist and Princeton economist, appears on the cover of next week’s Newsweek, with the headline “OBAMA IS WRONG: The Loyal Opposition of Paul Krugman.”

Krugman, who won the Nobel Prize in economics last fall, has been arguing that Obama is doing too little to respond to threats to the nation’s banking and economic system, and he has contended that the $787 billion stimulus bill should have been bigger.

Click here to read the Newsweek article

Krugman personifies a conundrum for Obama: He has to cope with complaints from the political left, as well as the more predictable opposition of the right.

The prolific professor has been pushing his views in his column, on his blog and in Rolling Stone.

Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham explains the choice in a letter to readers: “Every once a while, … a critic emerges who is more than a chatterer—a critic with credibility whose views seem more than a little plausible and who manages to rankle those in power in more than passing ways. As the debate over the rescue of the financial system—the crucial step toward stabilizing the economy and returning the country to prosperity—unfolds, the man on our cover this week, Paul Krugman of The New York Times, has emerged as the kind of critic who, as Evan Thomas writes, appears disturbingly close to the mark when he expresses his ‘despair’ over the administration’s bailout plan. …

“There is little doubt that Krugman—Nobel laureate and Princeton professor—has be come the voice of the loyal opposition. What is striking about this development is that Obama’s most thoughtful critic is taking on the president from the left at a time when, as Jonathan Alter notes, so many others are reflexively arguing that the administration is trying too much too soon.

“A devoted liberal, Krugman hungers for what he calls ‘a new New Deal,’ and he prides himself on his status as an outsider. (He is as much of an outsider as a Nobel laureate from Princeton with a column in the Times can be.) Is Krugman right? Is the Obama administration too beholden to Wall Street and to the status quo, trying to save a system that is beyond salvation? Does Obama have—despite the brayings of the right—too much faith in the markets at a time when prudence suggests that they cannot rescue themselves? We do not know yet, and will not for a while to come. But as Evan—hardly a rabble-rousing lefty—writes, a lot of people have a ‘creeping feeling’ that the Cassandra from Princeton may just be right. After all, the original Cassandra was.”

krugman-economy-bz01-vl-vertical


  • Rob

    See, this is why I fully support letting the newspapers fail. Without these papers this marxist piece of shit would be a no body.

    • DC

      Even if the newspapers fail, he’s still a nobody……
      I’ve never heard of him…….doubt if most other reasonable-thinking people have heard of him either!
      Just another leftist commie with a target painted on his back now that we know who he is…….. :twisted: :gun: :gun:

    • Kurt(the infidel)

      i had never of the guy until now. his opinion means nothing to me, just adds to my belief that are too many of these types in this country. we could stand to lose a few and still get by

    • solomonpal

      Fookin aye ROB!!!!

    • Rob

      well to be fair I never knew about Dollard until I saw the Young Americans Video on youtube and followed the link. Doesn’t mean that other people don’t know. The simple fact that he exists and is in a position to effect opinions of the handful of people who still read newspapers is bad enough as it is.

  • tlk

    Just looking at this motherfucker makes me ill. :evil:

    • http://patdollard.com Pat

      His eyes are full of evil. He looks like an evil, vengeful nerd. Like post-high school vengeful nerd syndrome gone berserk.

    • Jerry

      That same demonic undercurrent at play..just like Geoge Soros

  • Sully

    Krugman is the same kind of Nobel ‘laureate’ as Gore and Carter… making the award a joke.
    Meacham is another of the ‘Pelosi-progressive Catholic idiots.
    This would be welcome discord among our Marxist enemy if it wasn’t reminiscent of the infighting among Communists in the 20′s that brought Russia and the world Josef Stalin.

  • POD1

    A true believer.
    He just made the list.

    • TerryTate

      That list is getting long isn’t it POD1?

      :wink:

  • dacoelec

    What a fucking idiot…… Yeah…. if you’re broke, borrow then spend as recklessly as possible and keep doing this until…. voila!…. all of a sudden you’ll be financially stable again. Surely the dumb fuck libtards aren’t really this stupid!?

  • Steve in NC

    here’s a quote by krugman when reflecting on himself being part of the Reagan economic team:

    “It was, in a way, strange for me to be part of the Reagan Administration. I was then and still am an unabashed defender of the welfare state, which I regard as the most decent social arrangement yet devised.”

    I wonder, what wealth, besides that which goes directly into his pocket, has he ever created?

    He is a talking head with soft hands.

  • http://holgerawakens.blogspot.com Holger Awakens

    I’d be willing to be that Paul Krugman, while espousing all the merits of Socialism, Marxism and a welfare state, is presently thoroughly enjoying all of the benefits of the capitalistic system he wants to tear down. I’m guessing that good old Paul owns two homes, has a luxury European sedan, buys his suits at Brooks Brothers and in the end…he’d fight like a 5 yr old in a Target candy aisle to hold on to every one of those perks.

    • American Woman

      They are all like that, look at fat bastard micheal moore :roll: and the rest of hollyweird.

  • jasjfarrell

    he won the nobel because of his outspoken hatred of george w. bush.

    economists are a dime a dozen. each has their own opinion.

  • sierrahome

    I am so sick of horseshit. I am sick of eggheaded agenda driven horseshit. Two things my parents and grandparents always taught- “it is NOT what you make, it is what you save”. “Too many people live hand to mouth but at different plateaus”. Nice, simple logical–no Nobel prizes no MBA or PHD–just good old common sense.

    There is far too much horseshit and far too little common sense and that is all I gotta say.

    • unkaglen

      dittos sierrahome……. :!:

  • http://www.myspace.com/methushelah Demogorgon

    So for this so-called ‘esteemed’ member of Fascist-Left Academia it’s not sufficient for Obama, Geithner, and Congress to micromanage bailed out companies along with wildly spending our country into financial/economic extinction.

    I guess ‘Chairman’ Krugman (a.k.a. Pol Pot) really wants Wall Street executives, and their families, relocated to the countryside to work on various ‘stimulus’ projects; leaving ‘compassionate’ people like himself, Tim Geithner, and Barney Frank in charge of everything.

    A socialist economist — that has to be the ultimate in oxymorons. This guy even looks like he is a psycho! Last time I saw a Newsweek it was about as thin as a typical advertisement flyer you find in your mailbox, who actually buys it anymore?

  • Bob

    Does anybody smell a rat? Good Cop, Bad Cop situation here! Obama can say: Look Krugman the socialist hates my plan therefore it can’t be socialist. I don’t think smart people will be fooled but the majority of sheep like lemmings will buy this CRAP! “The Road to Serfdom” by F. A. Hayek in this case, is paved with stimulus and bailout BUCK$.

  • reagan54

    Why does this “economist” get the cover of Newsweek? All of you are right: he looks like a psycho and obviously is. Yet another magazine cover I get to rip off before it comes into the house. Has anyone read “Atlas Shrugged,” by Ayn Rand? Read it. We all need to fight socialism, marxism, communism by being vocal and voting in the next election to make sure the House and Senate stop any more of Hussain O’s absurd and reckless decisions from destroying us.

  • bd

    Evil is correct. However, how to we make the Evil interpretation (which is correct) to stick to socialism/communism/marxism as effectively as to nazism?

    Hollywood maybe?

    Shit, we’re fucked.

  • dogbert41

    GRRRRRRR :gun:

  • Scoot

    Whenever I see any of these bastards, I envision seeing them standing trial at Nuremberg after WWII.

    • solomonpal

      I like DC’s concept better.

  • JayMS

    Why does this blathering asshat get any press at all? Nobel-prize winning economist? NYT has been losing readership for decades and is no longer fit for wrapping fish or lining birdcages. I can’t beleive anyone would even care what he has to say about anything. Its like Carter lecturing us on foreign policy or Rosie O’Donnel giving diet tips.

  • Hawkerdriver(Pisson the Koran)

    :arrow: bd
    No,THEY’RE fucked.It will take a while,mabey a long while,but THEY are fucked!

    Lets start RIGHT NOW and never say that about our posit again.Who was the USA General that when surrounded at the Battle of the Bulge with no apparent way out,sent the surrender demand back to the Nazis with a polite FUCK YOU…Chesty Puller surrounded at the Chosin Resivoir-”We fought our way in we can fight our way out” Proof that you win or loose – based on attitude more than anything.

    I see a lot of posts here with the “We are fucked” seniment. I think this is very dangerous.That’s what the enemy gets up every day for – to demoralize us.If they are reading these posts,(FUCK YOU COMMIE MOTHERFUCKERS !!:gun: )and I hope they are,then no more posts of resignation.

    I’m not on your case bd,just thinkin’

    THEY.ARE.SO.FUCKED. :!:

    Keep the faith. :mrgreen:

  • HR Haldeman

    Another academic Economist that never worked a day of real work in his life.

    I did have some top notch real Economic Professors. One had a PH.D from U of Chicago the other from Boston College.

    Dollard’s comment says it all.

    However one can have intense eyes and still be good.

    A certain person in particluar comes to mind

    By the way Ayn Rand was a Radical Jewish Extremist who would gladly would have locked up ALL of YOU over your American Nationalism

    That pig was a closet Communist ala Horowitz

    You guys don’t actually think there are no private sector rich in Socialist Europe. People are fine over there folks.

    Working 50 hours a week for 30 years like an American slave is no great life and has its draw backs particularly on health and family

    German Socialism is working socialism practised in its highest greatest form between 1933-1945. Slackers back in that country were shunned. Zero free handouts.

    Hard to understand for you folks who live with the Negro welfare queens and white trash baby mill tramps
    called American Socialism aka welfare

    Krugman wants a new Jew Deal ala FDR. Of course if the owners wanted him to promote free ice cream he would. Shameless whore

    • http://tick-tick-booom.spaces.live.com ticticboom (Will Kill For The Constitution)

      Delete and ban this Stormfront troll.

    • reagan54

      You piqued my interest to further research Ayn Rand. The only book I have read by Ayn Rand is Atlas Shrugged, finished just a week ago, but I would like to find out why you think she was a closet Communist. From what I understand about her philosophy (from the back cover of the book) was that she felt the ideal political-economic system is laissez-faire and that ideally there should be a separation of state and economics just as there should be a separation of state and church. She was strongly opposed to fascism, communism and the welfare state, along with believing in the individual’s right to liberty and property, according the same back of the book cover. The book, Atlas Shrugged, gave me the message that when government is involved in economics, anarchy results.

      I’m interested in what you said about Germany from 1933-45.

      The bottom line is that I’m miserable about the present state of the U.S. and I find inspiration in Pat Dollard’s site and any other ideas or solutions that I can cling to.

    • Syndrome ( The dirty dirty Kafir)

      And no, Ayn Rand wouldn’t have locked anyone up for American Nationalism.

  • Mary

    I agree with Bob this is truly good cop, bad cop bs.
    Their readership will be placated by this and give them more talking points for Obama. “Krugman says he’s a moderate!” We of course know better…He’s a Marxist with only the destruction of this country as a mission statement.

  • Mary M

    Ayn Rand was not a communist. She was its antithesis. There are a number of you tube videos of interviews with her. She does not utter one collectivist thought. Her books are stirring anthems to freedom and individuality. That’s why she was viciously attacked by the Left.

  • Syndrome ( The dirty dirty Kafir)

    Krugman is one of those types that thinks he can think for people, and not just give them ideas, but actually plant ideas in their heads.

  • Tom in CO

    Down with the print media.

  • proud2beaninfidel

    WHEN WILL SOMEONE STEP FORWARD AND DO THE RIGHT THING? :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun: