Home  »  General  »  Obama Seeks Expanded Power To Seize Businesses

Obama Seeks Expanded Power To Seize Businesses



Mar 24, 2009 8 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

ap_blagojevich_obama2_081209_main

Washington Post:

The Obama administration is considering asking Congress to give the Treasury secretary unprecedented powers to initiate the seizure of non-bank financial companies, such as large insurers, investment firms and hedge funds, whose collapse would damage the broader economy, according to an administration document.

The government at present has the authority to seize only banks.

Giving the Treasury secretary authority over a broader range of companies would mark a significant shift from the existing model of financial regulation, which relies on independent agencies that are shielded from the political process. The Treasury secretary, a member of the president’s Cabinet, would exercise the new powers in consultation with the White House, the Federal Reserve and other regulators, according to the document.

The administration plans to send legislation to Capitol Hill this week. Sources cautioned that the details, including the Treasury’s role, are still in flux.

Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner is set to argue for the new powers at a hearing today on Capitol Hill about the furor over bonuses paid to executives at American International Group, which the government has propped up with about $180 billion in federal aid. Administration officials have said that the proposed authority would have allowed them to seize AIG last fall and wind down its operations at less cost to taxpayers.

The administration’s proposal contains two pieces. First, it would empower a government agency to take on the new role of systemic risk regulator with broad oversight of any and all financial firms whose failure could disrupt the broader economy. The Federal Reserve is widely considered to be the leading candidate for this assignment. But some critics warn that this could conflict with the Fed’s other responsibilities, particularly its control over monetary policy.

The government also would assume the authority to seize such firms if they totter toward failure.

Besides seizing a company outright, the document states, the Treasury Secretary could use a range of tools to prevent its collapse, such as guaranteeing losses, buying assets or taking a partial ownership stake. Such authority also would allow the government to break contracts, such as the agreements to pay $165 million in bonuses to employees of AIG’s most troubled unit.

The Treasury secretary could act only after consulting with the president and getting a recommendation from two-thirds of the Federal Reserve Board, according to the plan.

Geithner plans to lay out the administration’s broader strategy for overhauling financial regulation at another hearing on Thursday.

The authority to seize non-bank financial firms has emerged as a priority for the administration after the failure of investment house Lehman Brothers, which was not a traditional bank, and the troubled rescue of AIG.

“We’re very late in doing this, but we’ve got to move quickly to try and do this because, again, it’s a necessary thing for any government to have a broader range of tools for dealing with these kinds of things, so you can protect the economy from the kind of risks posed by institutions that get to the point where they’re systemic,” Geithner said last night at a forum held by the Wall Street Journal.

The powers would parallel the government’s existing authority over banks, which are exercised by banking regulatory agencies in conjunction with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Geithner has cited that structure as the model for the government’s plans.


  • http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewProfile&friendID=89280654 DEVILDOG81MM

    change

  • CDTFLINT

    Yay socialism.

  • German Dragon

    Perfect photo to accompany the article.

  • Mike Mose

    communism

  • Trep

    Socialize by taking our money … one nation under fear is where we are and the call to go to TX or Minnesota is very loud

  • GRIZZ

    Two fine men

    • GRIZZ

      Gallows humor?

  • Pat “The Christian”

    I don’t think the gov’t should seize any business ever. Let them fail. Other stronger companies will buy the failed business’s assets for pennies on the dollar.

    Same as the foreclosure business. Can you imagine what would happen if the people that bought plasma TV’s instead of saving for a rainy day got behind on there house payments and the gov’t stepped in and made their payments for them? It would subsidize irresponsibity and foster dependency.

    “if it moves tax it, if it keeps moving regulate it, if it stops moving subsidize it” Ronaldus Magmus

    Who is John Galt?