Second Amendment May Provide For Obama Army
Tweet
When Obama was campaigning last year, he uttered the following, on camera, in front of a large audience :
“We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.â€
Although the media largely skipped it, the shocking comment made the rounds on alternative media sites and radio. To my knowledge, he was never publically asked about it. Rahm Emmanuel, his chief of staff, openly discussed it, and bragged about the “voluntary” mandatory service, training, barracks, civil service “training,” etc.
The Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act, known as the GIVE Act, passed the House by a 321-105 margin. I believe the Senate just voted against cloture. This means that, for all intents and purposes, this bill will become law.
I know what you are thinking. Surely this is unconstitutional, right? Maybe not. In fact, Obama might have a good argument that it is constitutional. How? Under the Second Amendment?
The amendment in question reads as follows:
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
If Obama puts this under governors, or under some organizational leadership that can maintain the “militia” claim, he can make the argument that his security force is a “well-regulated militia,” that it is “necessary to the security of a free State,”
and that their rights to “keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
This might be how Obama and Dead Fish Emmanuel plan to implement this “security force.” If so, their argument is elegantly simple. I will have to do more research on this, but it may be specifically allowed under the Bill of Rights in the Second Amendment.
In my opinion, Obama, probably already has four of the five votes he will need should this matter make it to the Supreme Court, which it almost certainly will. That means, all he needs to perfect national control at the street level is . . . one supreme court justice. A single black robe. One unelected bureaucrat.
I suggest you reread my “I am a Student of History” essay [which Pat elevated from a comment to an article], consider how long ago that was written, all that we now know about Obama and the direction he is taking our wonderful Republic at breakneck speed, and then ponder what I just wrote above. It is pretty clear to me that we are heading quickly toward a statist regime.
TPS
 |
|