Defending the indefensible is a great way to look foolish, and it’s also a plus that “intelligent blond” is not oxymoronic with conservative women…hope she runs for office after college.
Typical nihilist, baseless unsupported arguments, lacking true moral understanding of such a life altering experience for both mother and child.
The delivery was obvious, the dem lackadaisical almost flippant, while the conservative examined the intrinsic value of life and the consequences of abortion with far more pathos.
Not aborting a precious life is a choice also. It is by far the more profound choice, and can truly only be appreciated when unborn life is viewed as sacrosanct – which many liberals clearly can not.
In true liberal (ill)form they deny their own existence as precious. May explain why so many are quick to embrace serfdom also..
Bill Smith
I have never been able to figure out why these people think that viability of the baby is some sort of determining factor. Show me, please ANY full term baby who is able to live on its own outside the womb? Do they have little baby sized shopping carts? Jobs?
No. Because they cannot live outside the womb for many, many years. Likewise, disabled, and elderly adults cannot live on their own “outside the womb.”
WHY is vulnerability, and non-viability seen as an EXCUSE to kill a helpless infant?
Why?
It gives you an insight to the thinking of these people.
http://snooperreport.com Mark L Harvey (aka Snooper)
Bill, a correction. You cannot get an insight into the Liberal Mind and how they think because their cognitive resonance of reality doesn’t exist. They have not the ability to think because they are driven, formed and motivated by child-like fear and emotion. They are void of understanding in all aspects.
kim
Bill, like all good liberals, they either change the definition of something or they change the parameters of the argument.
Case in point. The Republican debated on the rights of the unborn, while the Dem debated the rights of the woman. And while the Dem debated on the rights of the woman in grand, general gestures, she realizes she has to at least address that her “right” to choose, means essentially taking the life of an innocent. That cannot be afforded. So she dehumanizes that innocent as a “fetus” and offers platitudes of non-viability. Standard Operating Procedures for libs.
Really, look at the whole lexicon of their language and see how they have changed the definition of so many words with the help of the MSM: diversity, equal rights, hate, racist, etc.
If they can’t make social change via definition changes, then they resort to changing the context of the discussion. It’s been successful and it is evil!
Rudemeister
If there is the potential that an unwanted child will be neglected or abused, it is better to kill them. Right? Isn’t that what that talking points parrot said?
ROB (FLINT89)
“Dangerous and risky alternatives”
Wow, I never thought that adoption was so risky.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg Allen TX (Come and Take It)
OOOOOOH! BOOO YAH!
Chocolate City Dave
That dem chick should have asked the pres. if she could use his teleprompter
DesignR
A vapid, at best, argument by the Dem.
This proves that the left has no intellectual argument that can withstand simple debate on this subject.
On a broader note, it is the same across their entire political platform.
The problem is, name calling and violence begins before debate can even ensue. I’m shocked that this debate took place at all! We need a POWERFUL defense against the violent and disruptive elements at debates. Calling them names in return will do nothing to further our cause and will play into their hands. Violence should begat violence. If the leftist decide to disrupt and event, that should be met with swift violent suppression. Not deadly force, but police like force.
Civilian arrest procedures by off duty police would go a long way to allow a debate to actually take place. We know if that debate takes place, we win, every time. Logic trumps their arguments EVERY time we are allowed to speak.
Yelling back at them will do nothing but take us down to their level. We are a Civil Society that has a Police Force and Civil Arrest procedures for a reason.
We should use EVERY legal recourse imaginable in rapid, sure-fire, response EVERY time to counter them. This will suppress their attempts in a very serious way.
Ken
I half way expected the debate moderator to some out and say “We are all stupider for having listened to you. I award you zero points, and may God have mercy on your soul.” to the college dem.
Atilla Kahuna
“Life begins at the time of contraception.”
Really?
She probably believes this.
Bill
Wow. I’m only guessing that the “dem” was born AFTER Roe vs Wade. Ironic isn’t it. I believe she would have made a better argument from the womb than she did at the podium.
Armando Garcia
Plain and simpel, It’s sin. Yes good old fachion sin. Thats the only explaniton for libz reasoning. They lead such sin full lives, that whats wrong becomes right, and whats right becomes wrong. When a person is so full of sin and gilt, the only way to erase the gilt is to souround your self with others that are the same and it becoumes normal. So logecaly the next step would be to force every one else to be like yoursellf.
So our age old struggle is with the sin in them, we must be the alternative. Funny, Christan Conservative, being an alternative life style!
please look at this link about the Roe Vs. Wade tragedy. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33113
Caligula
hahaha typical liberal moron using syllogistic logic. so an abortion is the same as a tattoo… fuck you!!
if you decide to kill your baby you deserve to die too.
Joe Mudd
Consider also that the “Fetus” has it’s own DNA and therefore is not part of the woman’s body but occupies the womb and is dependent upon the mother, Two separate lives living as one thru pregnancy.
I argued with a lib online that debated that “the fetus had no right to the womb” These people are cold.
The right to choose ends at conception, after that choice has been made responsibility begins,,,,,,, I guess thats the old liberal rub.
ground wizard
in my opinion as a catholic, i don’t hear much of my church on the issue of abortion other than “we must protect the value of life” to me that does not put a big smack to the faces of the “CHINO’S”
i truly believe that people need to see video’s like this to understand what they are destroying.
other than that, if you log onto thier website sighn up and support them if you can.
canoechick2001
If we should end someones life because it going to be undesirable does that mean we can carpet bomb the entire third world?
http://earthlink nomee1
whats wrong with carpet bombing ?
DocOne
I have a question. If a fetus isn’t a life, then why does someone who kills a pregnant woman get charged with 2 counts of homicide? I asked a liberal (SUPER-COMMIE,actually)coworker this recently and he just said he couldnt talk to me about these things because I “just dont get it” …sweet argument, right?
trustme1013
ABORTION IS A HUMANE PRACTICE???
Watch this, chica. It’s not humane at all — it’s abominable. To quote from this video — it’s necessary to show videos of this horrific procedure for the same reason teachers show students videos of the Holocaust. There are simply no words to describe how incredibly depraved the results of this ‘procedure’ are. (you actually have to visit the website for these images — I don’t think YouTube is up for this kind of challenge)