Pat Dollard

Tweet

Last night, for the first time, I literally, physically, got the chills. It’s starting to sink in just how foreboding it was that the Department of Homeland Security so willingly became a political strong-arm instrument of the White House. It not only became a creator and distributor of partisan political propaganda, but it committed a terrorist act at the White House’s request. It sent out a document to literally terrify people from being caught standing amongst the crowd of those who would voice opposition to Barack Obama.

The Departmenty of Homeland Security, in essence, threatened all of those so caught in that crowd with at least character assassinatin and at worst, imprisonment. And it set the table for exactly that, by making the case for such action, in advance. It was selling the American people on a potential future course of action. “We’re merely protecting the country”. Kind of echoes the words of someone Obama seems to be very familiar with. Just substitute “preserving” for “protecting” and “Union” for “country”, and you’ll catch my drift.

It is no accident that memo was released two days before the tea parties, and what Congress really needs to be investigating is the communications between the White House and the DHS for the six weeks prior to the release of that “official report”, a report that even on its face, was written to exclusively protect the interests of one elected official, and his political minions.

Now who would have better reason to initiate this report being written in so specific a manner, and in fact, have every reason to unethically involve himself in the writing of it, than that one elected official? Oh, who is he? Barack Hussein Obama.

A light bulb did not suddenly go off in Janet Napolitano’s head inspiring her to write a report to exclusively serve the interests of Obama. The first person to have such an idea, would be the person who was the target of all the dissent and anger: Obama himself. Clearly it was his idea to have the report written in the manner in which it was, and clearly it was written in large measure by him and his White House staff.

At the moment, Napolitano is starting to look like every other individual Obama has used to achieve his ends, and then thrown under the bus. The very moment the report was released, an obviously and curiously prepared White House issued a statement distancing itself from it. And they did so for every reason you would naturally imagine, none of them good.

The fact that we are dealing with an unethical White House is of little concern to me. The fact that we are dealing with a sinister one is. The difference between the two is the measure of the distance between the ambitions of thieves and the ambitions of tyrants.

Fox News:

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is under fire for what critics see as a string of gaffes, with a small but vocal group of conservatives calling for her to step down.

The outrage continues to build over a report from her department that warned of the danger of right-wing “extremists,” and singled out returning war veterans as susceptible to recruitment.

Napolitano expressed regret for the reference to veterans — but she raised eyebrows again this week when she suggested that the Sept. 11 hijackers entered the United States through Canada, even though the 9/11 Commission determined they came to the United States from overseas.

“I don’t know that the secretary understands the depth of the disruption that she’s caused,” Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, told FOX News on Thursday, referring to the report on extremist threats. “I think the appropriate thing to do is for her to step down and let’s move on.”

Conservatives made a stern call for her ouster Wednesday night on the House floor.

“Mr. President, fire that woman,” said Rep. John Carter, R-Texas, complaining that Napolitano’s comments on the controversial report were half-hearted. “To go on television and say your apology to be, ‘I’m sorry you were offended by this report,’ that’s no apology.”

Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., also said Napolitano’s resignation is in order, and she should be brought before Congress for a hearing.

Napolitano on Thursday acknowledged the criticism and reiterated that the extremist report was “not well written” and should not have been released in that form. She said she would meet with the leadership of the American Legion on Friday over the reference to returning war veterans.

But she rebuffed those who say an apology is not enough.

“That’s what they’re going to get,” Napolitano said.

She also corrected her statements on Canada, admitting that she falsely suggested Sept. 11 terrorists crossed over from Canada. “I knew the minute it came out of my mouth it was wrong,” she said.

Napolitano first clarified her comments in a written statement that said: “I know that the September 11th hijackers did not come through Canada to the United States. There are other instances, however, when suspected terrorists have attempted to enter our country from Canada to the United States.”

Her explanation was not so clear during the interview Monday with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation that sparked the new controversy.

The secretary was asked to elaborate on comments about giving the Mexican and Canadian borders equal treatment, even though Canada is not experiencing a violent drug war.

“Yes, Canada is not Mexico, it doesn’t have a drug war going on,” she said. “Nonetheless, to the extent that terrorists have come into our country or suspected or known terrorists have entered our country across a border, it’s been across the Canadian border. There are real issues there.”

Napolitano was asked if she was referring to the Sept. 11 hijackers. She said: “Not just those but others as well.”

This angered some Canadian officials, who called such claims an unfortunate “misconception” in media interviews.

The Canadian newspaper The National Post unleashed on Napolitano. One column called the interview a “train wreck.” Another questioned how Napolitano could view the Canadian border as a “security threat on par” with Mexico’s.

“Ms. Napolitano’s brief interview with the CBC this week was confirmation we’re dealing with an irrational senior U.S. official who can’t differentiate between a secure border linking the world’s largest trading partners and one that’s a giant sucking sound for jobs going south and what’s been described as an ‘invasion’ of desperate Mexicans illegally sneaking north,” the column said.

Such criticism sprung in part from a speech Napolitano delivered last month at the Brookings Institution, in which she said “we shouldn’t go light on one (border) and heavy on the other.”

“If things are being done on the Mexican border, they should also be done on the Canadian border,” she said. “This is one NAFTA, it’s one area, it’s one continent and there should be some parity there.”

She said she intends to “visit myself” the Canadian border this spring or summer.

House Minority Leader John Boehner briefly addressed the criticism over Napolitano on Thursday.

“I think Secretary Napolitano has an awful lot of explaining to do,” he said.

FOX News’ Catherine Herridge contributed to this report.