Home  »  Economy  »  Don’t Mess With Texas: Gov Perry Backs State Sovreignty With Video

Don’t Mess With Texas: Gov Perry Backs State Sovreignty With Video



Apr 14, 2009 57 Comments ›› Chuck Biscuits

texas-flag

Office Of The Governor Of Texas

AUSTIN – Gov. Rick Perry today joined state Rep. Brandon Creighton and sponsors of House Concurrent Resolution (HCR) 50 in support of states’ rights under the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

“I believe that our federal government has become oppressive in its size, its intrusion into the lives of our citizens, and its interference with the affairs of our state,” Gov. Perry said. “That is why I am here today to express my unwavering support for efforts all across our country to reaffirm the states’ rights affirmed by the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. I believe that returning to the letter and spirit of the U.S. Constitution and its essential 10th Amendment will free our state from undue regulations, and ultimately strengthen our Union.”

A number of recent federal proposals are not within the scope of the federal government’s constitutionally designated powers and impede the states’ right to govern themselves. HCR 50 affirms that Texas claims sovereignty under the 10th Amendment over all powers not otherwise granted to the federal government.

It also designates that all compulsory federal legislation that requires states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties, or that requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding, be prohibited or repealed.

HCR 50 is authored by Representatives Brandon Creighton, Leo Berman, Bryan Hughes, Dan Gattis and Ryan Guillen.

The Resolution:

81R5789 MMS-F

By: Creighton H.C.R. No. 50

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States reads as follows: “The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”;
and
WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of
federal power as being that specifically granted by the
Constitution of the United States and no more; and
WHEREAS, The scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment
means that the federal government was created by the states
specifically to be an agent of the states; and
WHEREAS, Today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated
as agents of the federal government; and
WHEREAS, Many federal laws are directly in violation of the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
WHEREAS, The Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of
the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union
of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal
government may not usurp; and
WHEREAS, Section 4, Article IV, of the Constitution says,
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a
Republican Form of Government,” and the Ninth Amendment states that
“The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”;
and
WHEREAS, The United States Supreme Court has ruled in New
York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that congress may not
simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the
states; and
WHEREAS, A number of proposals from previous administrations
and some now pending from the present administration and from
congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States;
now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the 81st Legislature of the State of Texas
hereby claim sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the
Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise
enumerated and granted to the federal government by the
Constitution of the United States; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That this serve as notice and demand to the federal
government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective
immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these
constitutionally delegated powers; and, be it further
RESOLVED, That all compulsory federal legislation that
directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal
penalties or sanctions or that requires states to pass legislation
or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed; and, be it
further
RESOLVED, That the Texas secretary of state forward official
copies of this resolution to the president of the United States, to
the speaker of the house of representatives and the president of the
senate of the United States Congress, and to all the members of the
Texas delegation to the congress with the request that this
resolution be officially entered in the Congressional Record as a
memorial to the Congress of the United States of America.


  • Kermit

    What really gets me is that in a clip played today on Rush, Perry actually fired the “do push us to leave the Union” shot across Obama’s bow on Larry Kudlow’s show yesterday.

    This is huge and about damned time someone stands up to the commies.

  • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg/800px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png Allen TX (Come and Take It)

    Mr. Perry, I was getting ready to campaign against you because of the i-35 canadian super highway, but you have done the right thing here. God bless you Governor, and God bless Texas!

  • TedB

    I love Texas.

  • beddgelert

    I’m movin to Texas…

  • brovato

    :arrow: ticticboom
    Isn’t Texas the state that came up with the “COME AND TAKE IT” flag during the war with mexico? This should grow out of control for the inept gov’t if states exert their 10th Amendment rights under the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND!

  • pub

    Oklahoma introducted a resolution reaffirming the 10th Amendment last year and last month South Dakota became the second state to pass 10th Amendment resolutions.

    Thank you, states. Let’s take this country back.

  • MinneSoCold

    I saw this while researching what other states have already or are doing this and thought it was interesting:

    :arrow: An Article V Convention is the only mechanism of the right of state sovereignty that exists in the Constitution. Through that mechanism, and only through that mechanism, can the states reassert their sovereignty expressed in the Tenth Amendment. The states can bring about changes in our Constitution, which specifically address the excesses the current federal government has created.

  • SOC

    Proud to be a Texan. Go gittem’Rick. Take notes Obama,
    this is how an American leads.

  • Nanny

    While I appreciate Gov Perry’s words he needs to back them with action! As do a bunch more politicians if they want my vote in 2010. It is time we really start making our voices heard with ALL politicians! Get rid of every lobbyist alive and make these assholes listen to the people who pay their salaries. If they don’t have the title behind their name – they are toast and I don’t care if they are Republican or Democrat. Start doing the work of the people!

    And let’s not stop at tea parties! Keep up the pressure until Nov 2010 and send a message. No more spending. No more taxes. Get rid of the waste in government PERIOD. Then push for term limits BIG TIME! Then push for election reform – requiring a VALID ID to vote (I would prefer an intelligence test but know that won’t happen). No matter what your party line we need reform and FAST.

    In light of the DHS report on us “Right Wing Fanatics” let’s PROVE them wrong and show them we are AMERICANS!!! Let’s Roll!

  • tlk

    I’m moving to Texas..any state that says FUCK YOU OBAMA..is my kind of place!

  • Mrs. Scoot

    Methinks I will send this video to our great “I want Sunshine” Governor here in North Carolina. Bev the chicken Perdue.

  • sassysuz

    Article Five of the United States Constitution provides for two methods to propose amendments to the Constitution. The first is a vote by two-thirds of each house of Congress. The second method is a Convention to propose amendments to the United States Constitution, or Article V Convention. According to Article Five of the United States Constitution, an Article V Convention must be called, “on the application to the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States.” Once an Article V convention has proposed amendments, they must be ratified by three-fourths of the states in order for the amendments to become part of the constitution. Congress has the power to choose between two methods of ratification: ratification by the state legislatures or ratification conventions called for that purpose!
    To guard against oppressive government of any kind, the authors of the United States Constitution sought to establish institutional checks and balances. In framing the Constitution as the fundamental embodiment of such safeguards, the “Grand Convention” as Caplan described it, assembled in Philadelphia in 1787. One of the main reasons for the convention was that the Articles of Confederation required the unanimous consent of all 13 states for the national government to take action. This system had proved unworkable, and the Framers of the Constitution realized that it was necessary to have a better process for amending the Constitution. They also realized it was possible such reforms might be opposed by an unresponsive Congress. They thus created two methods for proposing amendments to the Constitution, as well as two processes for ratification of those proposed amendments. There is no historic record of any debate over Article V in the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

    The text of Article V reads “When two-thirds of the state legislatures apply then Article V of the Constitution requires the Congress to “call a convention for proposing amendments.” In the Federalist Papers Alexander Hamilton notes that applications by two-thirds of the states would be “peremptory,” and in the particular of whether Congress issues such a call, “nothing is left to the discretion of that body.” [2]. James Madison also affirmed Hamilton’s contention that Congress was obligated to call a convention when the requisite number of states requested it.[3]

    Over time, Congress has received numerous state applications for an Article V Convention. According to the Congressional Record, as of March 15, 2009, Congress had received 730 applications from all 50 states. [4] The text of these applications may be read at http://www.foavc.org. Seven state applications assert that a convention call was based on a numeric count of applying states and noting that Congress had failed to call a convention.

  • Cierian

    “Don’t mess with Texas!”

  • Bobachek

    If it wasn’t so fucking hot in Texas I would consider moving.
    This is the kind of backbone we need in government in all 50 states….

    Good for Texas!!!

  • sassysuz

    Delegates in each state are chosen through an election which must take place no later than one year after having been called by its governor. The number of delegates and details of candidate nomination and election vary from state to state. But typically, candidates have previously been chosen by petition (as in Ohio)[1] or by nomination by the governor, lieutenant governor, and speaker of the house (as in Vermont).[2] In the latter case, one half of the eligible persons would announce support for the proposed amendment, while the other half would be opposed. Therefore, the number of candidates must be at least double that of the final number of delegates, taking in to account possible abstainers. Traditional party affiliations are formally abandoned throughout this process, however

    “ the nominating petitions shall contain a statement as to each nominee, to the effect that he favors ratification, or that he opposes ratification, or that he will remain unpledged, and no nominating petition shall contain the name of any nominee whose position as stated therein is inconsistent with that of any other nominee as stated therein. ”

    (Ohio State Code, 1953).[3]
    When elected, the convention meets, discusses and casts its votes on the proposed amendment.

    The conventions assembled for the consideration of the Constitution’s 21st Amendment were unicameral.

  • DoubleTap

    Texas need to secede from the Union and then take OK, AZ, NM, CO, UT, ND, SD, MT, ID, NE, KS and WY with them. Cut the country in half and see what happens. The urban libs would starve in a month.

  • pub

    I second that. But not CO and NM. :evil:
    AR, TN, KY, NC, SC, MS, AL and don’t forget AK — we need Palin’s pipeline and missile defense system. I’m ready for it.

  • dadeo

    Remember Goliad!

  • Saxon

    If Texas goes,I`m going with them. The will need as many rifles as possible.

  • Vanessa

    Hooray for those who say the truth against our Government.

  • Tim Roesch

    Greetings:
    If Texas goes I am staying in MA.

    Sure, Texas will need rifles but I am originally from CA so I don’t think I would be allowed into Texas AND I think a good place to start a fifth column would be in MA.

  • aboutTObegin

    thats why I love Texas!!! Seems that the true Americans have a State behind them…..HMMMMMMMMMMMM
    now for the other States to follow!!!! Let’s get this rolling and get this usurper from continuing to squat in our White House! Lets get this Country back in order!!!

    -aTb

  • Kentucky Jim

    But if the states call this, everything is up for debate. There is some risk of loosing bill of rights items. Whereas, when congress initiates, only the specific amendment is at issue.

  • charlie

    CIVIL WAR 2 rise of the people coming to a state near you :twisted:

  • vivi libero o muori

    Yep. we need more Conservatives here in New England. The more the better. we should think about relocating into the heart of the enemy, and use subversive tactics like they used for the past 30 years…

  • vivi libero o muori

    Don’t forget, NH was the FIRST STATE to pass a bill about this very thing… we had this on the site a few months ago.

    “Live Free or Die”-Gen. John Stark, NH State Militia

    on another note:
    “If you’re gonna die, die with your boots on,
    if you’re gonna cry, just move along”- Iron Maiden

  • http://worddrum.wordpress.com/ Word-Drum

    The Country Of Texas

    Don’t know if somebody used this title that happen to come to me today(before hearing this story), but it would be a damn good name for a song or a movie…

    or a country. :gun:

  • Xcrypto

    Rifle in hand, and ready !
    Give the word, Texas.

  • aboutTObegin

    you are correct Vivi…lets just hope this starts to REALLY gain some momentum!!!

    -aTb

  • Screaming Infidel ____!____

    :gun: Ask Mexico how we treat tyrants :gun:

  • TedB

    Not a problem, there will be plenty after we invade from Texas. :mrgreen:

  • SunDevilDog

    Congratulations to all Texans, you live in the Union’s strongest state. I hope more govenors take Perry’s lead and assert their states’ 10th Amendment rights.

    However, the Cowboys suck and Romo is a Homo! :wink:

  • SunDevilDog

    I like the way Govenor Perry emphasized the “O” in oppression when he spoke of the federal government. Was he sending a message to “O”bama.

  • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg/800px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png Allen TX (Come and Take It)

    *minor correction* we will need as many *people to shoot* rifles as possible, bring ammo. :mrgreen:

  • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg/800px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png Allen TX (Come and Take It)

    check your history Word, 1836-1845. Republic of Texas.

    Also notice that the Texas flag flies as high as the U.S. flag.

  • unkaglen

    “God blessed Texas with his own hand”(Little Texas)
    Libs hate Texas and that is the reason I absolutely LOVE it.
    If we can get Gendal,Palin and a few others to join this chorus,we will have ourselves a true movement!!
    ROCK ON TEXAS……… :lol: :lol: :lol:

  • unkaglen

    :arrow: vivi…God bless the Patriots in NH.I pray to God this movement gains some steam….

  • aboutTObegin

    damn that makes me proud!!!!

    aTb

  • http://worddrum.wordpress.com/ Word-Drum

    History’s not my best subject, but I knew that. All I want now is reserved space in Texas(for me and my friends in the Dollard Nation).

    But we probably won’t show up. The US needs to stay a republic along with Texas. The Left has gone too far. They will be pushed back to Berkelee and Manhattan where they can make their own fucked-up country. :gun:

  • Sully

    The issue of States Rights needs to be tackled exactly the way Texas and other States are doing it… it’s 144 years overdue.
    HERE! HERE!

  • Tom Wales , WI

    Been to Texas, and loved it down there. It’s a great place with proud citizens that don’t take crap from anyone.
    Gob Bless Texas and the USA!!!

  • Tom Wales , WI

    My spelling sucks :cry: sorry

    GOD bless Texas & the USA!!! :lol:

  • reagan54

    Texas, I thought you were just big hair ladies who lunch with teeny little brains and men with even teenier brains with that embarrassing accent that makes me cringe and somehow makes you look even less intelligent. (Former Presidents Bush excepted.) I can never forget that Texas brought us Lyndon Johnson.

    But now I’m a convert! God bless Texas!!!!!

    GO TENTH AMENDMENT!!!

  • reagan54

    Don’t forget AZ!

  • aboutTObegin

    hey hey….the Cowboys dont suck and Romo aint no Homo…..hey may be a little fruity but thats all….you can have Jerry Jones though….
    :lol:

    -aTb

  • aboutTObegin

    no, the left need to be deported to the original Countries where either they or their lineage originally started! fuck them!!!!! They are the Cancer of this Country!

    -aTb

  • Ernest T. Bass

    AR for damn sure !!!

  • http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg/800px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png Allen TX (Come and Take It)

    if it comes to that Word, I will distribute GPS coordinates of rally sites that will be considered safe havens for members of the DN. It might look like tent cities out in the middle of nowhere, but it’s better than nothing.

  • Texasss1959

    Guys, I just had a thought…Under the agreement between the USA and Texas that brought about annexation in 1845, Texas has the right to divide into as many as 5 states if it so desires. That would give Texas 8 more senators in Congress, and therrefore MORE POWER to get changes done.

    Let’s push for division into 5 states and get this ship turned around.

  • Texasss1959

    Fannin was a f*****ing idiot. If he had followed Houston’s orders the Goliad massacre would have never happened. His delay cost lives.

  • Al

    Texas lead the way.

  • pub

    I hope Perry saw the CNN reporter go berzerk yeseterday and the mainstream media in general and realizes what we’re up against. We’re in the regime.

  • dadeo

    Actually I think Fannin was a pussy. But my point was that I prefer to die standing and facing the enemy in the process of expending my ammo. Rather than on my knees with a bullet to the back of the head. BECAUSE I DISARMED MYELF VOLUNTARILY.

  • Indy

    Texas isn’t leading shit. This is about Perry’s re-election, not Texas. He’s going to get his ass handed to him by K. Bailey, because he’s a spend-a-holic screw up.

    The only reason you see him now is his fear of losing re-election, so he had to jump on a cause that’s popular amongst his base… even though he’s never practiced what he preached.

  • DesignR

    I live in the anus of America, California. Being a 3rd generation Californian, I’ve got some perspective, over time, many may not have.

    Back in the day, we used to be like Texas in many ways. It was ‘Reagan Country’, very Conservative. But, we were invaded by the East-Coast after every New-Years Rose Parade and Rose Bowl event. They saw our weather and beat feet on in.

    What I am saying is, our Conservative Border Protection was non-existent, and now we have lost the State to the Left.

    Maybe it’s time to identify states that have a large enough right-wing population that we can all ‘migrate’ to. If it’s good for the Mexicans, it might be good for us.

    Our problem is that our ‘real property’ can’t move with us. The Real Estate market’s in the crapper, and we will need capitol to begin new business’s and buy land in the business friendly states.

    Jobs will follow us, because we create them! If enough real Capitalists’ move to specific areas, those areas will boom in an economic way.

    Here’s the rub, WE DON”T ALLOW ‘MIGRATION’ to these areas after a certain date, for a certain time. This is to allow success on our part without being infiltrated by lazy-ass minimum wage bums looking for a way into the welfare system.

    It will serve as a crucible, a test tube, to show the rest of the US that their money comes from US, the small business owners and working stiffs that pay their taxes. Their Socialist world will be shown to be the failure that is by us being something to point to.

    I’m just thinking… :wink:

  • Indy

    Migrating and forming… red colonies.. means the other side, who’s in charge right now, gets to work on your census.

    How many electoral college votes do you actually think you’ll get?

  • TennesseeVolunteer

    We’re all Texans now.

ENTER TO WIN AN AR-15, FREE