Home  »  Conservatism  »  Cheney Steps Up To The Dollard Standard, As Other Leaders Cower

Cheney Steps Up To The Dollard Standard, As Other Leaders Cower



May 22, 2009 21 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

060213_exp_cheney_hunting_e

I’ve been saying for awhile now that current Conservative leadership, from it’s three branches of power: elected officials, talking heads, and financiers, are cowering in fear from diving into the the breach, and fighting the political war we’re in like the political war it is.

Bloomberg is catching my drift.

However, not noted here, is the grim reality that the current conservative leadership faces: we, the grass-roots, are going to take them down before and during our takedown of Obama. We are going to yank them out of their seats of power, and plump our warrior asses in them instead.

To be clear: I am calling for a broad revolution as it is the full and final requirement for the salvation of this country. A peaceful, political, media, and cultural revolution, of course.

Join us in ACTIVE, and let’s git ‘er dun.

Bloomberg:

May 22 (Bloomberg) — Former Vice President Dick Cheney accomplished something yesterday that Republicans have seldom been able to do: directly challenge President Barack Obama in real time on a major policy issue.

In a nationally televised speech delivered just minutes after Obama had spoken on how to protect the U.S. against terrorism, Cheney defended the decisions he and former President George W. Bush made after the Sept. 11 attacks, including using harsh interrogation methods on terror suspects.

While Republican leaders have largely avoided direct attacks on Obama and focused instead on Democratic congressional leaders, Cheney, 68, has taken the opposite tack. Republican lawmakers and strategists said he was able to raise the intensity of the criticism yesterday because, unlike other party members, he isn’t worried about damaging any future political ambitions by taking on a popular president.

Cheney “might not have the highest favorability ratings, but on this issue, I think he’s viewed by people across the country as being very credible and very knowledgeable,” said Senator John Thune, a South Dakota Republican. “What he says carries a lot of weight.”

White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said Cheney’s prominence in the debate was actually an advantage for the administration, because it showed disarray within the Republican Party.

Anyone But Cheney

Most Republicans would probably prefer to be represented by a standard-bearer whose name was “picked out of a hat” rather than Cheney, Emanuel said in an interview with a small group of reporters at the White House yesterday.

The picture presented by Obama and Cheney’s dueling speeches “is the future versus the past,” he said. The American people “have a larger vision of foreign policy and what the president is doing.”

In a poll by CNN/Opinion Research Corp. that was released this week, 55 percent of respondents said they had an unfavorable opinion of Cheney, compared with 37 percent who had a favorable view. That was an 8 percentage-point improvement from January, when Bush and Cheney left office with approval ratings near the lowest levels in history. By contrast, Obama’s approval ratings have been above 60 percent since he took office Jan. 20.

Still, Republican strategist Jim Pinkerton said Cheney’s popularity “doesn’t really matter,” because he “is not running for anything.” What is important, he said, is that “Cheney absolutely has the better of the argument.”

Ask Harry Reid

Pinkerton pointed to the 90-6 vote in the Senate on May 20 when Democrats, including Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, joined Republicans to strip from a spending measure the $80 million Obama requested to fulfill his promise to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by the end of the year.

“Don’t take my word for it, take Harry Reid’s word for it,” Pinkerton said.

Obama appeared yesterday at the National Archives, the repository of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, to criticize the previous administration’s policies and build public support for his national-security approach in the wake of reversals such as the Senate vote.

The detention center at Guantanamo, he said, “set back the moral authority that is America’s strongest currency in the world.” The Bush administration “was defending positions that undermined the rule of law,” he said. Its decisions on how to handle suspected terrorists were built on “ad hoc” legal measures that were “neither effective nor sustainable.”

‘Most Fundamental Values’

“We also cannot keep this country safe unless we enlist the power of our most fundamental values,” Obama said. “Time and again, our values have been our best national security asset.”

The president also indicated that some prisoners who can’t be tried for legal reasons and are considered too dangerous to let go may be held indefinitely.

He noted that more than 500 Guantanamo detainees had been released under the Bush administration.

Almost as soon as Obama finished his remarks, Cheney began speaking just two miles away, at the American Enterprise Institute, a research organization that generally supported Bush’s policies.

He opened his speech by joking about Obama’s address starting late. His tone quickly turned more grave as he claimed that interrogation tactics such as waterboarding saved American lives.

‘Stop Them’

“When an entire population is targeted by a terror network, nothing is more consistent with American values than to stop them,” he said. He would make those decisions again “without hesitation,” he said.

“Our government prevented attacks and saved lives,” Cheney said at AEI, where his wife, Lynne, is a senior fellow. “Only detainees of the highest intelligence value were subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques.”

Cheney faulted Obama for releasing Justice Department memos that authorized the use of those techniques. Doing so “was flatly contrary to the national security interests of the United States,” Cheney said.

John Feehery, a Republican consultant, said Cheney’s instant response to Obama gave his party one of its rare victories since the Democrats took control of the White House and both chambers of Congress in the November election: the ability to challenge Obama’s domination of the airwaves and the news cycle.

That success, said Feehery, who served as spokesman for former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, was linked to the decision to engage the Democrats on the theme of national security, a subject where Republicans have historically had an advantage.

‘Everything We Could’

“The percentages are more with Cheney than Obama,” Feehery said. “What Cheney is basically arguing is that we did everything we could to make the country safer, and what Obama is arguing is that we don’t have to do as much to make the country safer.”

Feehery said Cheney had gotten the better of the president with barbed lines like one in which he said the current administration’s approach is more geared to receiving “applause in Europe” than protecting America’s security.

“There’s no doubt about it, this is the first time they’ve got him,” he said. “This is the first time that Republicans feel like they have some momentum.”

He said Cheney’s defense of the Bush policies as necessary to protect the U.S. will seem prescient in the event of a terrorist attack.

“If something goes wrong, people are going to remember what Cheney said,” Feehery said.


  • IRONMIKE

    Former Vice President Dick Cheney accomplished something yesterday that Republicans have seldom been able to do: directly challenge President Barack Obama in real time on a major policy issue.

    “BEEN ABLE TO DO”, more like been courageous enough to do.

    Cowards are standing idly by while professional politicians and the statists are stealing our freedom.

  • Ranger7582

    dito :gun: :gun:

  • maggiew

    Cheney gives a hoot what others think of him or his
    standing. He is an American first.
    He is willing to take a stand.
    Cheney walks the walk.

  • Armando Garcia

    “doesn’t really matter,” Some of these no all of these fools, America sent to represent us just don’t get it at all. We must no longer send bureaucrats to represent us unless they under stand what it means to be an American like Cheney. Republicans in office must stop this roll over and die method they have adopted, and stand up for us, that also apples to the democrats.
    We cant and wont take it any more.

  • DoubleTap

    Agreed. Gutless cowards.

  • SgtJenz

    Cheney is a statesman. A man of character and dedication who loves this country down to his bone marrow.
    He’s proven his mettle, survived the character assassinations, and still holds his high with a clear vision of not only who he is but of the country he has so honorably served.

    I salute V.P Cheney. May God bless you sir.

  • Lock and Load

    “The picture presented by Obama and Cheney’s dueling speeches “is the future versus the past,” he (Emanuel) said. The American people “have a larger vision of foreign policy and what the president is doing.”

    The whole problem here is that skags like Emanuel are setting the agenda and talking points with the kind of BS quoted above :roll: With Obambi’s policies America will have NO future, because it’s enemies are being given break after break by this traitor. :evil: Americans who voted for this Marxist dictator have absolutely NO IDEA about foreign policy – it shows by their continued support of these idiotic initiatives. Hopefully, people will begin to wake up and indeed see what the “president” is doing and raise HELL. I would rather rely on the PROVEN past of GWB/Cheney (no attacks in the US, success in Iraq) than rely on Obambi BS and promises. Cheney is giving facts and figures, and wants Obambi to release more facts and figures to further prove his points that the GWB programs were successful. Obambi and his minions in the MSM would rather talk about vague ideas and concepts which have already been proven to be DEAD WRONG. Cheney’s daughter has sliced and diced a number of libtard MSM hacks in the last few days on FACTS about the CIA programs (Rush aired some of the encounters today). :twisted:
    America needs men like Cheney to stand up and kick ass against Obambi, Emanuel and the rest of these traitors. Republicans need to get their heads out of their asses and follow Cheney’s lead NOW. The reaction of the MSM and Obambi himself show that they have taken a serious body blow, and they are scrambling to get back on track, so NOW is the time to further the attack and keep them scrambled. :twisted:

  • GRIZZ

    I love that picture.BIG DICK have a long life.Thank you for your service to this GREAT NATION.And a BLESSED MEMORIAL WEEKEND TO EVERYONE THAT LOVES AMERICA. :beer: :beer: :beer:

  • GRIZZ

    She is defineitley a Cheney.Smart women

  • Mark Gibbons

    Will some other republican get off their ass and help?No way because they are intimadated by this soft administration. EVERY REPUBLICAN IN OFFICE MUST FUCKING GO AWAY. Dead or alive. I have never seen a bunch of lazy assed, gutless pricks who think not stepping up is the answer. Pathetic they are helpfull to the cause they are not.

  • Dirtmanf800

    Ok one real :!: conservative goes up against the 0, calls it like it is, the Senate votes 90-6 against the 0. Do you think the republicans will learn from it? Fat chance, I hope I’m wrong :sad:

  • Jay

    When Bush added Cheney to the ticket it cemented my vote. Its refreshing to see him kicking Obama’s ass.

  • Bob

    I would love it if Dick Cheney took Yomama and noMANuel duck hunting!

  • lastconservativeblackmanonearth

    Cheney and Limbaugh. Two of the finest Patriots and Thinkers of our time. Period.

  • http://snooperreport.com Mark Harvey (aka Snooper)

    Cheney/Palin 2012?

  • aboutTObegin

    now that would be a Great mix!!!! Cheney for President, Palin as Vice President!!!!!! UNSTOPPABLE!!!!!

    -aTb

  • Mark Gibbons

    How about a Cheney Cheney ticket?

  • http://patdollard.com Pat Dollard

    :beer:

  • http://patdollard.com Pat Dollard

    :gun: :beer:

  • http://n/a rightside

    :beer: :beer: To this web site.

  • Minuteman1

    Cheney going after Obama and Newt going after Pelosi? ’bout fucking time!!! :beer: :beer: :beer: