Comments on: Feminist Bitch Maureen Dowd: Men Are Not Necessary

By: Banger

Banger — Tue, 19 May 2009 04:17:20 +0000

She’s just bitter because she knows she isn’t necessary.
To anyone.
Just go away you pig whore.

By: tlk

tlk — Tue, 19 May 2009 02:18:23 +0000

Well they are good for a coupla things…

By: reagan54

reagan54 — Tue, 19 May 2009 01:56:27 +0000

You said it the best!!

By: GRIZZ

GRIZZ — Mon, 18 May 2009 23:38:30 +0000

:beer:

By: mike3481

mike3481 — Mon, 18 May 2009 22:27:45 +0000

Oh, she knows the NYT is sinking.

That fact explains three books in three years.

By: anonymous hourly worker

anonymous hourly worker — Mon, 18 May 2009 16:08:39 +0000

Jane, you ignorant slut. Maybe you enjoy licking snatch but the rest of us big girls would no more live without a man than eat dogshit for dinner. Here’s an idea: stick with your dyke friends and leave more great dick for the rest of us.

By: JCELEPHANT

JCELEPHANT — Mon, 18 May 2009 15:36:20 +0000

It sickens me when a NY Times staffer is interviewed by a former NY Times staffer about a book no one will read. The only bright side is that these two don’t realize their ships are sinking.

By: IP727

IP727 — Mon, 18 May 2009 13:42:44 +0000

Maureen Dowd, where boners go to die.

By: JayMS

JayMS — Mon, 18 May 2009 13:37:44 +0000

I won’t waste my time watching this blathering idiot other than to say she is probably like all the other “girl power” feminists out there who trash on men but marry some rich dude that supports them.

By: nomee 1

nomee 1 — Mon, 18 May 2009 13:30:48 +0000

if she were knocking soma out every now and then, she would have a differnt point of view, but she dosent seem to like men. ( lib media and all )