Comments on: Gingrich: Pelosi Should Be Disqualified As Speaker http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/ The War Starts Here Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:16:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: vincenzo4 http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454340 vincenzo4 Tue, 19 May 2009 18:50:36 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454340 She should not resign...this is not a settlement between parties where one admits that there is not enough evidence but we can't move forward. She should be relieved of duty, clearance suspended then terminated when fully adjudicated and found guilty. She should not resign…this is not a settlement between parties where one admits that there is not enough evidence but we can’t move forward. She should be relieved of duty, clearance suspended then terminated when fully adjudicated and found guilty.

]]> By: vincenzo4 http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454335 vincenzo4 Tue, 19 May 2009 18:48:17 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454335 Relieved of her duties; security clearance revoked, U. S. Attorney's Office consider criminal obstruction, perjury and false official statements charges. After 32 years of a career federal, when it comes to senior people who are charged and or found guilty or allegations of administrative misconduct are substantiated: What would we do if this were a GS-5 or E-3??? To aggravate the depth of seriousness, these senior people have a greater responsibility because "...honor is what you do when nobody is watching..." J. C. Watts. I think the detterent affect of justice in the case of US v Pelosi will send a very loud message that honor and ethics and obedience to the rule of law is cherished as a mechanism of protecting people's rights, and to violate that is to bring consequences that are certain, severe, swift. Public trust has been corrupted because none of the three is part of the scenario when the American people are violated. Democrats ALWAYS slither out, Republicans are usually thrown in fron of a freight train and abandonned. Relieved of her duties; security clearance revoked, U. S. Attorney’s Office consider criminal obstruction, perjury and false official statements charges.

After 32 years of a career federal, when it comes to senior people who are charged and or found guilty or allegations of administrative misconduct are substantiated: What would we do if this were a GS-5 or E-3???

To aggravate the depth of seriousness, these senior people have a greater responsibility because “…honor is what you do when nobody is watching…” J. C. Watts.

I think the detterent affect of justice in the case of US v Pelosi will send a very loud message that honor and ethics and obedience to the rule of law is cherished as a mechanism of protecting people’s rights, and to violate that is to bring consequences that are certain, severe, swift.

Public trust has been corrupted because none of the three is part of the scenario when the American people are violated. Democrats ALWAYS slither out, Republicans are usually thrown in fron of a freight train and abandonned.

]]> By: Steven D http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454250 Steven D Tue, 19 May 2009 17:09:31 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454250 Newt, you make the mistake of thinking Liberals have shame for anything. Newt, you make the mistake of thinking Liberals have shame for anything.

]]> By: SgtJenz http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454141 SgtJenz Tue, 19 May 2009 14:39:38 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454141 Keelhaul the bitch. It was the "original" method of waterboarding. She'd change her tune after the first pass. Keelhaul the bitch. It was the “original” method of waterboarding. She’d change her tune after the first pass.

]]> By: nomee 1 http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454092 nomee 1 Tue, 19 May 2009 13:17:45 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454092 throw her fat ass out of office today, kicking and screeming :lol: throw her fat ass out of office today, kicking and screeming :lol:

]]> By: tlk http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454089 tlk Tue, 19 May 2009 13:13:48 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454089 She isn't going to give up that gravy train unless she is dragged out of there. She isn’t going to give up that gravy train unless she is dragged out of there.

]]> By: tlk http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454068 tlk Tue, 19 May 2009 12:42:38 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454068 I don't think Democrats resign. Ever. I don’t think Democrats resign. Ever.

]]> By: Old Retired Petty Officer http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454063 Old Retired Petty Officer Tue, 19 May 2009 12:31:02 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454063 Rail, tar, feathers. Some assembly required. Rail, tar, feathers.
Some assembly required.

]]> By: Phil Byler http://patdollard.com/2009/05/gingrich-pelosi-should-be-disqualified-as-speaker-for-cia-comments/#comment-454033 Phil Byler Tue, 19 May 2009 11:19:34 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=73370#comment-454033 Newt is correct: Pelosi should resign as speaker. Newt is correct: Pelosi should resign as speaker.

]]>