Limbaugh Says He May Support Sotomayor – With Video

June 3rd, 2009 (15) Posted By Erik Wong.

limbaugh_soto_ap_297_button

POLITICO:

After calling Judge Sonia Sotomayor a “reverse racist” last week, conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said Wednesday that he may now possibly support President Barack Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court.

“I can see a possibility of supporting this nomination if I can be convinced that she does have a sensibility toward life in a legal sense,” Limbaugh said during his show.

In justifying his flip, Limbaugh pointed out that Sotomayor is Catholic and “doesn’t have a clear record on abortion.”

Hinting that Sotomayor could possibly support overturning Roe v. Wade, Limbaugh said “whoa, it would be huge.”

“I don’t know if it will ever happen,” Limbaugh said, before claiming that the “opportunity” of her support in overturning the landmark abortion case could be enough to get his backing.

Despite voicing potential support, Limbaugh also said that he is not backing off his claim that Sotomayor is a “reverse racist.”

“I’m not retracting it. Nobody’s refuted it,” he said. “When she says she’d do a better job than a white guy, what is it? It’s racism, reverse racism, whatever, but it’s still racism. She would bring a form of racism, bigotry to the court.”

Limbaugh was joined last week by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in calling Sotomayor is a “racist” for past statements suggesting that a “wise Latina woman” could come to a better decision than a white man.

Gingrich backtracked from the comment Wednesday, writing in Human Events that his initially reaction may have been “perhaps too strong and too direct.”

“The sentiment struck me as racist and I said so. Since then, some who want to have an open and honest consideration of Judge Sotomayor’s fitness to serve on the nation’s highest court have been critical of my word choice,” Gingrich wrote.

“With these critics who want to have an honest conversation, I agree,” he added. “The word ‘racist’ should not have been applied to Judge Sotomayor as a person, even if her words themselves are unacceptable (a fact which both President Obama and his Press Secretary, Robert Gibbs, have since admitted).

Limbaugh knocked Gingrich for backing off his comment , saying “I didn’t know why he had retracted it, and I still don’t.

“What did he say? Why did he retract it?” Limbaugh asked. “I have my own theory about what Newt’s doing, but since I’m not doing it, I’m not going to comment.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • mike3481

    I heard this on his show today, I believe he’s baiting the baby murdering, pro-abortion crowd into not supporting whats-her-face for the SCOTUS.

    I was laughing when I heard it cos I knew what he’s doing AND it’ll probably work cos the “baby-killers” can’t afford another pro-life Justice up there.

    Limbaugh’s setting up a Fly-paper trap. It ought to fun to watch.

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

  • AFITgrad86

    You have to understand Rush to see where this is coming from.

    An endorsement by Rush especially one that hints at a possible vote to overturn Roe v. Wade is reverse psychology at it’s best. How can any liberal be on the same side as Rush? The Roe thing is just speculation but it “sows the seeds” of doubt among her supporters.

    Brilliant move Rush …

  • http://ip727.wordpress.com/ IP727

    Butt ugly carpet muncher.

  • Lottie

    :arrow: :mrgreen: I see a method to his madness! :cool: I need to learn to think in this way! Any sugestions? now keep it nice! :wink:

  • sassysuz

    I agree, I heard Rush today and the Government controlled NBC had it on as soon as Rush said it. He did say, she is just a racist who supports life. Mindless robots

  • http://osmoothie.com sam, LA

    if you listened to his show today you would have realized it was a joke

    and all the media outlets ran with it like a serious story before he even finished his broadcast

    ohhh how they so desire for powerhouses like rush limbaugh to come off as flip-flopping, when all along their liberal heroes have been such liars and hypocrites

  • USMCTANKS

    They’ll only hear bits and pieces between bong hits……”whoa dude.. rush supports this chick cause she hates babies or something…that’s totally bogus !!”
    Misinformation at it’s core…

    P.S. being stoned makes you and the rest of your squad easy targets !! If you partake stop! It’s time to grow up! Your country is under attack!!

  • jasjfarrell

    I agree with Rush. She is a Catholic and is pro-life. For that reason and that reason alone, I would have to support her.

    Better she discriminate against white men than kill the unborn.

    • sassysuz

      Do you understand she is for the overthrow of our Nation being apart of LaRaza. Get with the big picture, being for a single issue and ignoring the rest is what gets Us into all this trouble. I’m pro-life, but do not want an activist Judge on the supreme court, who ignores the Constitution. Supporting her is wrong open your eyes

  • Sully

    Komrades Pelosi and Biden are pro-choice faux Catholics.

    • Edd Bernard

      Sassysuz, I hope you’re wrong. Rush is the first one that ever told me the truth about what was really going on in the political world. I don’t want to believe that he is that fearful of being called a “racist.” I am totally and completely pro-life. Perhaps he is just being shrewd, as Rush can be. I so want you and I to be wrong on this. Because, if he IS back-tracking, then what’s left?

  • JayMS

    Meh.

    There is no way in hell Obama would nominate someone who is pro-life. Though if she DOES turn out to be pro-life I would laugh my ass off.

  • David

    Think about this: Have any of his picks made any rational sense? He selects people who hate America ands will do anything to bring us down.

  • Cold Dead Hands

    Her true religion is Statist Liberalism. It trumps Catholicism. There is really no question at all that she is pro-abortion! That it might possibly become a topic of discussion is what is shocking, and is the last thing Godless libs want. Her claim to be a Catholic will serve to continue the intra-Catholic arguments that began earlier this Spring when Notre Dame invited 0bama to receive an honorary law degree and speak at the commencement exercises.
    Rush, in his brilliance, is setting her up to have to declare her views on abortion, while, concurrently, insane pro-choicers panties will bunch-up as they contemplate “what ifs”. Great, great move by El Rushbo. Sort of an “Operation Chaos 2.0″.

  • Tom in CO

    Interesting approach, Rush. We’ll see how it pans out.