Comments on: Honduran President Was Ousted For Illegally Amending The Constitution To Extend His Rule, Just As Supporter Chavez Did, And Supporter Obama Seeks To

By: aboutTObegin

aboutTObegin — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:46:24 +0000

how about ANY amendment!

By: rightside

rightside — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:01:45 +0000

Why did Franken won in Minn. So Obama can have more control over our lives. Just watch in 2012 more republicans will lose more seats. Like he said you haven’t seen nothing yet. :gun: :gun:

By: Sully

Sully — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:01:38 +0000

Barry puts his Muslimness ahead of his Marxness?
Just a guess.
I mean he didn’t bow to Chavez.

By: mark

mark — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:43:57 +0000

What is so impressive about the bungling here is that it contradicts every argument the administration has made in support of restraint and caution when it comes to the Iranian protests. Obama didnâ€™t want to insert the U.S. into an Iranian dispute. Iranians, he said, would decide their own future. Hondurans apparently are not accorded the same respect. Their sovereignty isnâ€™t quite as important. Obama withheld judgment about the legality of what had happened in Iran. In Honduras, he just knows that what the military did was illegal, despite far stronger evidence that it was legal and a result of the proper functioning of their constitutional system. U.S. intervention in Honduras has been no less than it has been in Iran. Indeed, it has been far greater. At least six times in the 20th century beginning in 1907, U.S. forces were deployed in Honduras. For fear that the U.S. might be seen to be replicating the error of 1953, Obama has kept his distance from the Iranian dispute. As ever, Central American nationsâ€™ past resentments about frequent U.S. intervention count for little or nothing, and so Obama has dived right in.

Off another blog .. right on the money

By: sassysuz

sassysuz — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:42:27 +0000

sorry twenty second

By: sassysuz

sassysuz — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:41:58 +0000

Anyone who thinks about amending the second Amendment to the Constitution, had better not think about campaigning in public again :gun: :gun: :gun: :gun:

By: Ivan the Kafir

Ivan the Kafir — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 03:20:47 +0000

Democratic my ass! Amending a constitution to extend your reign NULLIFIES, I repeat, NULLIFIES any democracy your country might have had. That is to say, you can’t democratically remove someone who has done away with democracy!!!!!!!!

People need to understand that constitutional laws are designed to protect both the people AND the leaders. If the leaders fuck with the constitution, they can expect a bullet in the head. If the people fuck with the constitution, they can expect to be sent to prison. Its all about balances of power.

All groups should have legal, democratic recourse to justice without having to resort to violence. But any group who attempts to tinker with that ability deserves nothing LESS than violence.

By: Sully

Sully — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:56:45 +0000

What’s up with the arrogant meddling there Soetero?
Scared for your own ass?

Does anyone doubt the U.N. would back Barry under similar conditions?

By: Rob

Rob — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:12:13 +0000

This column explains it all.
http://jewishworldreview.com/cols/charen063009.php3