Sebelius Says Obama Will Crush Health Insurance Industry

June 16th, 2009 (4) Posted By Pat Dollard.

Newsmaker Sebelius

WASHINGTON – The insurance industry won’t be able to block a public health plan because most Americans realize they would be better off if the industry had competition, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said Tuesday as congressional committees worked to shape legislation.

In an interview with The Associated Press, Sebelius said that President Barack Obama does not want to drive health insurers out of business, but make them more competitive by offering working families and small businesses the option of a public plan without the high overhead costs of marketing, administration and profits.

“I think there is a lot of understanding that the private market has really failed to provide affordable coverage to Americans,” Sebelius said. The industry has had “a lot of opportunities” to get rid of coverage restrictions and other unpopular policies, Sebelius said, and really “hasn’t served Americans very well.”

However, Sebelius stressed that Obama is open to compromise on the shape of the public plan, which doesn’t have to be run by the government. She spoke positively of a compromise idea that envisions consumer-owned nonprofit cooperatives, like rural electricity or agriculture co-ops. They would get started with seed money from taxpayers but then compete without government control. The plan by Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., may end up in a health overhaul bill to be unveiled by the Senate Finance Committee this week.

In the end, the insurance industry will blink first in any showdown over a public plan, Sebelius predicted.

“I think they understand there’s a lot of momentum both in the House and in the Senate for something to pass, and they’d much rather be inside the room, having those discussions, and helping to shape it as much to their liking as they possibly can,” she said.

Sebelius, the former Kansas governor and insurance commissioner, is taking on an increasingly upfront role as a spokeswoman for Obama’s effort to overhaul the health care system to provide coverage for nearly 50 million uninsured and restrain costs.

The massive department she heads, Health and Human Services, is working on plans to expand coverage by signing up more people who are eligible for existing government programs such as Medicaid and children’s health insurance.

In the interview, Sebelius also said that covering the uninsured could take years, even if Congress passes a bill and Obama signs it into law this fall.

Stretching out the phase-in period could make it easier to handle the costs of the bill, estimated at $1 trillion over 10 years at least, a sum that already is prompting second thoughts from some key lawmakers.

The idea of a public plan has drawn sharp opposition from the insurance industry, which sees it as a step toward a government-run system like in Canada or the United Kingdom. Business groups, doctors and hospitals also have concerns. Republicans have made the issue the cornerstone of their opposition to Obama’s health care push. And while liberals enthusiastically support a government plan, conservative Democrats are leery.

Sebelius said that Obama is not trying to run insurers out of town.

The notion that a public option “is really the stalking horse” for a government-run system “is not accurate,” Sebelius said.

A public plan would be offered along with private ones through a new kind of insurance purchasing pool called an ‘exchange.’ The exchanges would be open to individuals and small businesses, and maybe even some large companies. Sebelius said a public plan would provide a standard for affordable coverage against which private insurance can be measured, especially in underserved areas of the country.

Sebelius’ comments came after disappointing cost estimates for health care legislation by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. The Congressional Budget Office released estimates that his bill would cost about $1 trillion over 10 years and only cover about one-third of the nearly 50 million uninsured. Budget officials cautioned that these were early estimates of a bill that’s only partly written.

Sebelius discounted the early estimates, while saying the administration wants to keep the cost at about $1 trillion over 10 years, with about two-thirds of that coming from shifting funds from existing health programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

While Sebelius said the “ballpark” cost for providing full coverage seems to be about $1 trillion, the budget office estimates suggested the price tag could get even bigger.

Costs are becoming a big worry for moderate Republicans the administration is hoping to win over.

Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, on Tuesday said the process that produced Kennedy’s bill is “broken.”

“We have a fundamental obligation to ensure this legislation does not increase the deficit and, sadly, current congressional health care reform efforts fall woefully short,” Snowe said in a statement. Obama also says he wants the bill to be fully paid for.

Stretching out the length of time for providing benefits under the bill could be one way to deal with the cost crunch.

“Will something probably be phased in? You bet,” Sebelius said in a question-and-answer session with The Associated Press. “It won’t start the day after the bill passes.” It could take until sometime during the next presidential term, which starts in 2013, she said.

(AP)

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • alexakim

    Ok, it has the medical health industry scared witless.
    Too many companies like this have to be scared into being humane.

    Why did they wait until a gun is to their head to even consider offering something even barely affordable for those they have rejected for pre-existing conditions? Who would’ve been paying for it by now, with after tax dollars, no less? So far as I’ve heard, they still aren’t even really offering it now.

    I’d be more sympathetic to the insurance industry if it had been more sympathetic to me. So, sorry, I can’t muster up a tear for them.

  • vincenzo4

    We’ve had some unprecedented security compromises out of this administration. Now, what two industries have been the marvel of the world, the source of quality of life and a target of those who would see us kneel? The auto industry and the best medical health in the world. So, now we know what they are targetting, but why?

  • JayMS

    “The notion that a public option “is really the stalking horse” for a government-run system “is not accurate,” Sebelius said.”

    Bullshit. Liberal interest groups make no secret their desire to have single payer. The public “option” is not really an option at all since you will pay for it no matter what. Yes, you can keep private insurance but who is going to pay for the public “option” AND private insurance premiums?

  • Eric

    As an insurance agent (that doesnt sell health) I can tell you the free market has not had the option in many states like mine (washington) where democrats control the state legistatures. Republicans here on the health insurance reform committe have lots of great ideas, but have not been able to even get them out of committee ruled by Dems…so consumers suffer from lack of choice and high cost. I pay $725 for a fmaily of four with high copays and deductibles. If the Dems would actually allow competition, who knows how much we could save. As it is, few companies are even willing to apply to the market here due to all the BS red tape. Now Obama wants small business to be required to pay for employees health care! (cost 119 BILLION) The answer is have government eliminate all health care for gov employees and let the consumer decide. It is not fair for gov workers (paid by tax payers) to get their health insurance and inflated wages paid subsidized while most small businesses cannot afford to pay that much in wages for equal work and to pay for health care of its workers. SInce when is health care or mortgage payment or care payment the employers responsibility?!!