Comments on: Air France 447 Crashed Intact After Vertical Plunge Into Ocean

By: cocorico

cocorico — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:38:03 +0000

if you’we not too stubbown, you can wead this wepowt :

http://www.eurocockpit.com/archives/indiv/E009454.php

By: cocorico

cocorico — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:25:22 +0000

may-be you’we too avewage to undewstand that Brazil had kept the recowds

and still youw teen brwain dweem of conspiwaties LMAO

By: Average Joe

Average Joe — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:50:03 +0000

cocorico,
Just one problem in Ah Fwance version, everyone stated that 1st night that the RADAR CONTACT WAS LOST AT 30,000-35,000 feet…It was there, then suddenly gone. (poof, BOOM, BLAM, etc).

If it was intact going down to sea level, the RADAR & TRANSPONDER would have had the plane tracked to the ground….35,000 then 32,300 then 26,000 then 18,000, etc. EVERYONE (Brazilians, French, FAA, and all) SAID FROM THE BEGINNING THAT THE MYSTERY OF FLIGHT-447 WAS THAT THE PLANE WAS GONE AND DISAPPEARED IMMEDIATELY, AND JUST VANISHED IN THIN AIR. POOF.

THAT TYPE OF IMMEDIATE DISAPPEARANCE IS DONE BY ‘SUDDEN DECOMPRESSION’ FROM BOMB, MISSLE, HOLE IN PLANE, OPENING A DOOR, OR SHOTS FROM INSIDE PLANE THAT A BREAK WINDOW OR DAMAGE FUSALAGE.

For Ah Fwance to try to “Pull a Rabbit out of the Hat” after the fact is like the CIA-video that was lying for Bill Clinton that TWA-800 is a “gas-tank explosion” and not Terrorism.

Yep, according to Bill Clinton, TWA-800 was the one-and-only time a Boeing B-747 exploded because of a fuel explosion, and not brought down by Iranians using a Soviet-style Stinger at approximately the same altitude and distance from land that the Americans accidently shot down an airliner during the Gulf War era. Ya know, the tit-for-tat kind of paybacks the Iranians are known for.

By: mike3481

mike3481 — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:02:06 +0000

I know a 20 yr. Captain over at Continental Airlines & he’s told me that he doesn’t know anyone who enjoys flying the new Airbus.

It’s fly by wire of course, but the problem is the software. It at times, responds to flight control input very slowly, anywhere from 5 to 20 seconds.

Imagine the possibilities.

By: Bill Smith

Bill Smith — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:51:15 +0000

It sounds like they don’t mean a nose down vertical, but rather that the plane fell out of the sky flat, as you would slap a table with the palm of your hand. The only things I can think of that would fit that scenario are a flat spin, or the fuselage minus the wings. Since they say it didn’t break apart in the air, that leaves the flat spin. We just don’t have enough information.

By: cocorico

cocorico — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:32:20 +0000

OK you’re very intelligent, you know better than the experts, the sound tracks, the remains, the corpses, witness that this isn’t a terrorist attack but a sensors, speed, altitude problem.

By: Birdddog

Birdddog — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:55:49 +0000

Very informative.

By: Hobbiehawk

Hobbiehawk — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:43:28 +0000

It wasnâ€™t THE CRASH that caused the problem…

It’s the sudden stop at the end

By: Bob

Bob — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:20:25 +0000

I wonder why they would try covering up a terrorist attack? Money?

By: Average Joe

Average Joe — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:05:09 +0000

True,
It wasn’t THE CRASH that caused the problem, it was the water’s fault!!!! So says Air France.

Funny that a BOMB still might be a cause. But Air Fwance is sticking to IMPLAUSABLE, almost Laughable, excuse of instrument error.