Home  »  Conservatism  »  Dem’s Constant, KGB-Like Attacks On CIA Could Lead To Showdown With Cheney

Dem’s Constant, KGB-Like Attacks On CIA Could Lead To Showdown With Cheney



Jul 18, 2009 9 Comments ›› Erik Wong

cheney1

FOX News:

Vice President Dick Cheney has long been a target of Democrats for his role in developing and implementing the Bush White House’s anti-terror policies, and Democratic legislators soon may get a chance to hold his feet to the fire over a secret proposal for a CIA hit squad.

The proposal never got off the ground, and President Obama’s CIA director, Leon Panetta, canceled the plan last month after learning of its existence.

But Democrats in Congress have raised objections to the news that Cheney years ago reportedly directed the agency not to inform Congress about the proposal to train teams to kill Al Qaeda leaders abroad. The House Intelligence Committee announced Friday that it will launch an investigation to determine whether laws were broken.

Some congressional analysts, however, warn that if Democrats try to put Cheney on the hot seat, they risk blowback because of Americans’ apparent ambivalence about Cheney’s take-no-prisoners approach to fighting terrorism.

“I can’t think of a situation better than to cross swords with congressional Democrats,” Ross Baker, a political scientist at Rutgers University and a congressional scholar, told FOXNews.com. “As far as Cheney is concerned, his natural constituency is conservative Republicans, and they would rally to his side. This increases his stature.”

And Cheney still would hold leverage if he defied an invitation or subpoena to appear, Baker said.

“It would put Cheney in the position of standing up to the bullies on Capitol Hill,” he said.

Panetta told the House and Senate intelligence committees about the Bush-era CIA plan June 24, a day after he first learned of the operation and canceled it himself.

Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Tex., chairman of the House committee, said in a statement Friday the probe “will focus on the core issue of how the congressional intelligence committees and Congress are kept fully and currently informed.”

But Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill, added that if the investigation finds that Cheney ordered Congress not to be informed of the plan, “there is reason to believe that is a significant violation of the National Security Act.”

“We’ll follow that thread where it takes us and determine if there’s reason to refer the issue to the Justice Department or clarify the laws regarding notification,” she said.

The National Security Act requires, with rare exceptions, that Congress be informed of covert activities, though only the committee leaders and party leaders in the House and Senate are brought into the loop.

If lawmakers are considering inviting or serving a subpoena to the former vice president to discuss his role in the program, they would be wise to note that Cheney’s approval ratings rose this year after sparring publicly with the Obama administration over its national security policies. Cheney has argued the new administration’s policies are making the country less safe.

At a hearing, Cheney could make it a “moot court on whether or not the Obama administration is seriously interested in preventing terrorist attacks.”

Baker said he doesn’t believe that Democrats would be deterred by those risks because they’re under pressure from their base to go after Cheney and other Bush administration officials. But they would go after Cheney at their own peril, he said.

“I think there’s a serious danger they’re overplaying their hand,” he said, adding that he believes Cheney could win support among swing voters as a result of an investigation targeting him. “I see it as a situation that Cheney could exploit to his own advantage.”


  • http://cclevel.vox.com cclezel

    I would love to see them step into that trap. Cheney will detroy them.

  • tlk

    Wow! This sure will be interesting to observe!

  • http://WorldsBestResumes.com Judith, typical White Ohioan

    I think Cheney is one of a handful of honorable men left in our government. I like him a lot…if Sarah is a barracuda, then the Veep is a Great White!

  • vincenzo4

    I think a direct confrontation is absoltely in order and should happen as soon as possible. I think we already have enough to charge Obama with Espionage or Unauthorized Disclosure. I notice his little stunt with the Inspector General of the CNSC disappeared from scrutiny. I wonder what that great obelisk of true justice, Eric Holder, that great lecturer of cowardice and courage is doing to pursue justice on behalf of that criminally dismissed IG.

  • vincenzo4

    By the way, when you inform and read on the entire HPSC, you have informed Congress. You’ve seen monumental, devastating national security violations, compromises by the President and Congress, just since January 2009 alone, and they want ALL of Congress read on to some apparently very serious information.

    This is nothing but a set-up and end-run to compromise national security using the cover of suppoosed Constitutional ethics.

    The more people you tell, the less secure it becomes. Of course, these people know precisely what they are doing, and we are stupid to believe every word. Cheney is not the issue here, and has never been the problem.

  • http://bd41f1d0e3b34a3887607611a481ade3 Monkeysdad(A 4th of July American all year round)

    Bring it on MFers. All of this was brought back out to provide cover for the Dems failing policies and lack of support for Obambis health care theft.

  • copperpeony

    This quoted analysis is off topic but in the same vein as what the Demcracks are trying to do to Cheney:

    “Barack Obama is now part of a multiple criminal conspiracy of firing people in an attempt to silence them. Always remember though that one White House firing in power is a counter reaction that empowers someone else’s definition of impeaching that White House.

    Do not ever make the mistake of seeing things in liberal flat world one dimension as many things are at play in this. Maj. Cook is going to have to fight this one out on point, but there are powers of various sorts who will use his position for their own blackmail and their own cover.

    Barack Obama made his greatest mistake in the firing of Maj. Cook, because unlike Lawrence Sinclair the liberal gay groups would not come to Mr. Sinclair’s aid, but in Maj.

    :arrow: Cook’s position Obama ordered the US military to eat one of their own. That meal will not digest any more than Obama Pelosi going after the CIA.

    The tides of battle are turning and Obama is playing to his weakness now in the military. This is a battle he will lose.”

    http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009_07_15_archive.html

  • Medaton

    Cheney could single handedly raise the ‘conservative’ GOP approval by 20%. I say, “BRING IT ON!”

  • http://BETTYLOU WORRIED IN IL

    IF THE DEMS GO AFTER THE CIA AND MR. CHENEY..IT WILL BE ONE THAT THEY LOSE…1. THEY WILL PROVE TO ALL HOW WEAK THEY ARE ON NATIONAL SECURITY..2 IT WILL PROVE BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT THEY AND THIER MOUTH (THE N.Y.T.) CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO KNOW ANY THING. 3. COMPLETE LIARS..N.Y.T. RAN THE STORY IN 2003 SO THE DEMS KNEW OF THE “POSSIBLE” PLAN THEY HAD TO TO BE ABLE TO BLAB TO THE N.Y.T…4. THEY WILL SET IN PLACE A PRESIDENT TO INVESTIGATE THEM WHEN THEY LOSE CONTROLL…AND THEY WILL… EVEN THE HARDHEADED DEMS IN MY AREA THAT VOTED FOR NADAR BECAUSE THEY DID NOT WANT TO VOTE FOR “THE ONE” BUT COULD NOT BRING THEMSELVES TO VOTE REPUB….ADMIT THE MADE A HUGH ERROR…..EVEN MY BLACK NEIGHBOR ADMITS IT AS A MISTAKE.. HIS WORDS “HE IS JUST A BOY IN A MANS JOB”