Home  »  Economy  »  Looming Deadlines For Healthcare Force Obama To Call In Backup

Looming Deadlines For Healthcare Force Obama To Call In Backup



Jul 13, 2009 3 Comments ›› Erik Wong

health-care-reform

WASHINGTON — The White House summoned two lawmakers critical to President Barack Obama’s hopes for health care overhaul to a private meeting Monday as the timetable for a comprehensive bill continued to slip.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., were to meet at the White House on Monday afternoon, according to an official who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations.

Baucus and Rangel are in charge of the crucial job of coming up with how to pay for a comprehensive health care overhaul that would cost an estimated $1 trillion over 10 years, mostly for subsidies to help cover some 50 million uninsured Americans.

The meeting comes as Obama, newly returned from an overseas trip, must refocus on his top legislative priority: a sweeping health care bill to bring down costs and cover the uninsured. Timelines for the health legislation continue to be pushed back, with a bill unveiling promised for Monday in the House sliding to Tuesday as House Democratic leaders struggled to regain support from moderate and conservative Democrats who threatened opposition last week over the bill’s price tag and other issues.

The White House’s strategy to leave the legislative back-and-forth to Congress has produced varying and sometimes contradictory versions of health care legislation — along with delays. As the Senate turns its attention to Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearings, the focus on that side of the Capitol will turn away from Obama’s top domestic priority.

The administration’s Democratic allies in Congress hinted they would not deliver legislation before leaving town for an August recess. The delay would be a blow to the White House and to Democrats’ electoral prospects.

The House and Senate are working toward legislation that would deliver on Obama’s popular goals from his presidential campaign, but they are hardly in unison. House Democrats have proposed raising taxes on wealthy Americans to pay for the plan.

That idea appears to face opposition in the Senate, where a bipartisan group of senators is trying to reassemble a financing package now missing a key component: an unpopular tax on high-cost health insurance benefits, which would have raised $320 billion out of a $1 trillion package.

A bipartisan deal would have a better chance of winning broad support. That’s what Obama says he wants, and the best chance for such a deal is still in the Senate.

But after a turbulent week, senators will move cautiously. A lot more work is needed to avoid another round of miscalculations.

Republicans, seizing on an issue that affects all Americans and has shown a glimmer of hope for an out-of-power political party, have lambasted the proposals as rash and irresponsible. They also see the issue as a way to win House and Senate seats in the 2010 midterm elections.

“There is no chance that it’s going to be done by August,” said Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz. “President Obama was right about one thing: He said if it’s not done quickly, it won’t be done at all. Why did he say that? Because the longer it hangs out there, the more the American people are skeptical, anxious and even in opposition to it.”

Obama’s Health and Human Services secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, tried to calm fears Democrats would tax some employer-provided health care benefits as income. She said the details are far from finished.

“Well, the House has a version,” she said, discounting any version as final. “There are a couple of different proposals being worked on in the Senate.”

Sebelius spoke with CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday and Kyl appeared on ABC’s “This Week.”

(AP)


  • josephus

    50 million uninsured?
    That number is BS!
    It’s really 16 million truly uninsured.
    Out of that supposed “50 million” and it’s sometimes 47…9 million are ILLEGALS who get health care for free already.
    The rest are kids under 29 who reject coverage, others are still covered by their parents and others are shuffled on and off COBRA and between jobs — so they get lumped into this fictitious number even though it changes — and others refused SCHIP, Medicaid and Medicare.
    This number, like everything these people present IS A LIE.

    Now let’s indulge these reckless maniacs for a second. Let’s say that 50 million out of nation over 300 million really don’t get medical care. SO F’ING WHAT!?

    You’re going to tear down the best medical system in the world because a minority group has no coverage? You’re gonna ruin for it everyone else?

    Here’s a message: Get a job. Become a CITIZEN.
    Because I’M NOT PAYING FOR FAILURES TO ACHIEVE IN LIFE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Fuck, I’ve had it!

  • Sully

    Why not tax medical negligence awards, including attorney fees, 100%?
    That’s a huge pile of dough.
    Or let the Feds manage malpractice insurance instead oe health insurance.
    ANOTHER huge pile of money.
    Leave US the FUCK alone!!

  • Hawkerdriver (Pisson the Koran

    I love the talk of “bipartisan” once again.How can you have a bipartisan agreement when all that’s under the dome is ONE PARTY of pussy liberals,save for mabey one or two.

    These shitbags won’t even read this.Staff won’t either.Little yuppies are to busy catching up on the latest MJ news.

    Where is cap and trade in all this? Haven’t heard a word on it lately. They are drawing our fire to health care to take it off the capitalism killer of the millineium.

    300 million held hostage by 535. Somebody wake me from this nightmare. :evil: