Obama Eligibility Goes To Court!

July 14th, 2009 (89) Posted By Erik Wong.

billboardbirthcertificate

Ledger-Enquirer:

U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, set to deploy to Afghanistan, says he shouldn’t have to go.

His reason?

Barack Obama was never eligible to be president because he wasn’t born in the United States.

Cook’s lawyer, Orly Taitz, who has also challenged the legitimacy of Obama’s presidency in other courts, filed a request last week in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order and status as a conscientious objector for his client.

In the 20-page document — filed July 8 with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia — the California-based Taitz asks the court to consider granting his client’s request based upon Cook’s belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces.

Cook further states he “would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command. … simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties.”

Cook, a reservist, received the orders mobilizing him to active duty on June 9.

According to this document, which accompanies Cook’s July 8 application for a temporary restraining order, he has been ordered to report to MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla., on Wednesday. From there, the Florida resident would go to Fort Benning before deploying overseas.

Documents show Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, two years after it became a state.

A hearing to discuss Cook’s requests will take place in federal court here Thursday at 9:30 a.m.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • ground wizard

    and does anybody think that this will turn out the way we all hope it would, no

  • josephus

    There is also another case where the same lawyer served O-frauda BEFORE he was inaugurated meaning he had to respond as a private citizen and would be unable to use the DOJ as a defense fund.
    O-frauda ignored the case and is now in default. THAT case was up for review yesterday:

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103918

  • josephus

    The judicial system is as corrupt and busted as the rest of the checks and balances.

    This will lead nowhere….I think we all know that.

    We have better shot at winning the lottery than seeing the actual African birth site revealed.

  • David B in Texas

    Posted 7/13/2009… http://vrwcgrapevine.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-eligibility-case-will-be-heard-on.html

    GREAT NEWS ALERT!!

    Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits !!
    Please distribute everywhere.

    Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.

    At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
    1. There will be a trial.
    2. It will be heard on the merits.
    3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
    4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
    5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
    6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.

    The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.

    Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.This is from what my interpretation of our conversation.Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.

    Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter. Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
    Dr Orly Taitz, Esq sitehere: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/

  • David B in Texas

    This entire post can be found here: http://www.therightsideoflife.com/?p=6644

    Of particular interest is this:

    Just Yesterday, Robert Farley, a staff writer from the St. Petersberg Times, wrote an essay entitled, “Obama’s birth certificate: Final chapter. This time we mean it!” in which Farley regurgitates many of the usual Obot arguments in defense of the Obamamessiah’s bona fides and attacks those that question them. In response to his tiresome screed, Ron Polarik, emailed Farley the following:

    Dear Mr. Farley:

    I’m glad you find document fraud to be so funny, because the American people who were deceived by these phony images are not at all amused. They certainly are not happy about Politifact promulgating a forgery. Exactly which part of Obama’s spending a million dollars of campaign contributions to keep his real birth certificate hidden, is “laughable?”

    Obama has gone the entire year without ever showing a real, paper birth certificate to anyone in government, anyone in authority, even anyone not shilling for him. What has been shown, however, is a totally fabricated Certification of Live Birth (COLB) image.

    Now, what is a really sick joke is claiming that this heavily-doctored “scan image” that was posted on Obama’s (now defunct) website, Daily Kos Website, Politifact’s website, and Factcheck’s website, was made from the same object shown in Factcheck’s photos: the ones with the exaggerated Seal impressions and second fold lines. Even a five year-old can see that there’s no way in Hades that a high-resolution “scan image,” with no Seal or second fold line showing, could ever have been made from the document object shown in the Factcheck photos.

    Do you really think the American public is as mindless as the people perpetrating this fraud?

    I have to give you props, though. I never thought that Politifact could be more wrong than the last time they tried to pass off this forgery as the real deal. It was back in June of last year. Amy Hollyfield was the reporter at the time, and in talking with Janice Okubo, she created a conundrum.

    We all know Janice Okubo, don’t we? She’s that helpful Public Relations Officer (Communications Officer) at Hawaii’s DOH, who’s not exactly Hawaii’s answer to Google when it comes to all things COLB.

    When asked about Obama’s birth certificate, Okubo told Hollyfield that “a copy of the birth certificate was requested in June 2008,” but she wouldn’t specify by whom.

    Even Amy pondered the implications of that statement as she was reviewing the many criticisms of the bogus “scan image”:

    Isn’t the date stamp bleeding through the back of the document “June 6, 2007?” (Odd since it was supposedly released in June 2008.)

    “Odd, indeed!” How can a 2007 Certification of Live Birth (COLB), date-stamped “June 6, 2007″ have been requested in June 2008?

    The answer, though, is quite simple, really: Hawaii never produced a 2007 Certification of Live Birth for Obama with a date-stamp of June 6, 2008.

    Last year, I spoke with the Hawaii State Registrar, himself, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka, who provided me with the following bit of information, when I asked him if Janice Okubo had confirmed that his office produced a 2007 COLB, date-stamped June 6, 2007, with Obama’s birth information on it.

    He said, “Absolutely not. No one in our office confirmed it.”

    That’s right, Mr. Farley. Obama’s 2007 COLB is a nonexistent document, and what’s shown in the “scan image” alleged to be real a real copy of Obama’s birth certificate is nothing but that same, original fabricated forgery that first appeared on June 12th of last year.

    What does that “scan image” prove?

    Document fraud. Internet fraud. Voter fraud. A forged Certification of Live Birth, designed and proffered with one purpose in mind: to deceive the American public into believing that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is qualified to be President.

    A secondary purpose of this document fraud was to prevent citizens and lawmakers from ever seeing his real, original “vault birth certificate, so, it comes down to this:

    Anyone who says that Hawaii issued a 2007 COLB for Obama, and that a true copy of it is posted online, is either (a) misinformed, (b) misleading others, or (c) lying through their teeth.

    Regarding Politifact’s ridiculous “Truth-o-Meter,” did Press Secretary Robert Gibbs lie when he said that the Obama Administration posted a copy of his birth certificate online?

    Did Clinton have sex with Monica Lewinsky?

    Of course Gibbs lied. Obama’s Campaign lied. Factcheck lied. The Daily Kos lied. Snopes lied. Politifact lied. The Star Bulletin lied. The Honolulu Advertiser lied. All the media who are in-the-tank with Obama lied. All of his liberal Leftist supporters lied.

    But, the facts don’t lie. There is no 2007 COLB for Obama, and Hawaii State Registrar, Dr. Alvin T. Onaka said so.

    Last year, in addition to getting the word from Onaka, I conducted five months of empirical research that proved, conclusively and irrefutably, that the “scan image” alleged to be Obama’s COLB is a fabricated image, and no amount of bitching by the opposition is going to change that fact.

    I can’t really blame them for thinking they see a real COLB instead of a phony one. After all, there are a lot of people who claim to see religious characters in Cheetos, Corn Flakes, or fried eggs. However, it’s all in their heads.

    All of the statements claiming that the “scan image” posted online looks “identical” to an actual 2007 COLB, is pure nonsense. None of the real scan images of a real 2007 COLB, as well as the photos taken of a real 2007 COLB, look anything like what Politifact and Factcheck claim.

    The Seal shown in Factcheck’s photos looks nothing like the real Seal shown in real 2007 COLBs.

    If you go to my website, The Greater Evil, and read my research, you’ll find at least twenty reasons why the image posted online is totally bogus.

    I’ve got another twenty more that show how this one, bogus scan image has engendered the biggest cover-up in political history. All of the efforts made by Factcheck, Politifact, Snopes, and other, assorted Obama flunkies, have been either to promulgate the forgery as a real document or to cover up the fact that document fraud has taken place.

    It goes like this: the Obama Campaign claims that they posted a genuine copy of Obama’s real, original birth certificate and then points to Factcheck when anyone asks for proof. Factcheck then refers them to their August 21 article, “Born in the USA,” and points the finger back at the Obama Campaign as the source of the real, original birth certificate. And, so it goes. What a nice, neat little circle of deceit going on here.

    One hand washes the other.

    In case you forgot or never knew, Factcheck is funded by the Annenberg Foundation — the same foundation that gave a $30 million grant to William “The Unrepentant Pentagon Bomber” Ayers, to start the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, and then hired an inexperienced community organizer in one Barack Obama, to be the Chairman of the Board working alongside him.

    Besides lying about Obama’s birth certificate and doing all it can to cover up the fraud, it was Factcheck who claimed that Obama never interacted with William Ayers as an adult — let alone directly worked with him on the Annenberg Challenge. The lies that Factcheck has told run long and deep.

    Nice sister site you got there, Robert. Think about that the next time you want to write a screed about Obama’s bogus birth certificate.

    Regards,

    Dr. Ron Polarik

    • Randy

      Very nice. Thank you.

    • rxsid

      A number of sources (namely snopes) that some in Congress (& the media) relied on as being authoritative on “proving” Barry’s (fake) short form to be authentic…have been caught with their pants down:

      “News sites swap Obama’s birthplace like magic UPI, Snopes change location within hours of WND report”
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103465

      “Obama’s ‘birth hospital’ in astonishing cover-up Once proudly celebrated president, now in active mode to hide ‘proof’
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103633

  • mike3481

    I found this comment on the Ledger-Enquirer version of the story;

    From; heywood_jablome

    07/14/2009 03:04:43 PM:

    one would not need a certificate of live birth short form, if there was a birth certificate long form. Omama is hiding something. either he was born in Kenya as the Kenyan’s state, along with Gradmum, or he was born in Hawaii, left for Indonesia, was raised Muslim as his Indonesian school records indicate, lost US citizenship, came back, went to school, got all sorts of grants as a non-citizen, never re-established his citizenship and ultimately went OOPS, and doesn’t want to face the truth. The truth always comes out, and I can’t wait until the day he gets deported. the question for the Libs is, what IF he really isn’t a natural born citizen ? what should happen ? Let’s pretend for a moment he really is not qualified. What should happen ?
    _________________________________

    Three Beers For heywood jablome.
    :beer: :beer: :beer:

    • David B in Texas

      He should be tried for High Treason!!

    • mike3481

      And face charges for a six hundred million dollar election fraud.

    • Hawkerdriver (Pisson the Koran

      High Crimes and Misdemeanors.

      Treason.

      Subversion.

      Espionage.

      Fraud,violation of RICO.

      Blackmail,and Coersion.

      Accesory to murder..(possible ties to Odinga)

      Giving Aid and Comfort(see espionage)to known enemies of the United States.(see ortega,chavez,achmedinegiad,et al )

      This is just the start. :beer: :gun: :gun:

    • Racerrose

      Joe Biden.

    • http://www.accdf.com aboutTObegin

      what happens to traitors during Wartime?

      he and all of his colleagues to include the media and those in the courts need to be held accountable…and yes, that includes the Supreme Court. ALL OF THEM NEED TO BE TRIED BY 12!!! they allow a usurper to infiltrate our Country, betray its people and think that when the truth comes out, they will be safe? I DONT FUCKEN THINK SO!!!! They are all just as guilty and need to be held accountable for their crimes to America!

      -aTb :mad: :mad: :mad:

  • unkaglen

    I’m all for any legal action that questions the legitimacy of the presidency of one B. Hussien Obama.You throw enough mud against the wall you might just get some to stick… :lol:

  • David B in Texas
    • tlk

      I think it’s because he was born a woman and had a sex change operation.

  • me gusta el constitution

    You would think that with how much Obama loves attacking conservatives and their credibility, he’d just release the birth certificate and remove all doubt, while getting to say “I told you so, now shut your neo-con whore mouths and pass my legislation*! I don’t care if you only had half an hour to read 800 pages, DO IT!”

    Unless…

    *since when the FUCK does the president have a hand in writing legislation? (Rhetorical question)

  • Oscar2Kafir

    Poached from an email I was sent today.

    stand by to copy

    More questions and this time, they’re really good questions.

    I have little interest in getting into the middle of the Obama birth issue, but yesterday Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so and he believes the issue can be
    resolved by having Obama answer one simple question:

    How could a young man arrive in New York in early June 1981 without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly, only one month later, find the money for an around-the-world trip?

    And, once he was on a plane, shuttling between
    New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport
    was he carrying when he passed through U.S. Customs and Immigration?

    The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, as concerned citizens, they must have the answers.

    The ongoing debate over Obama’s citizenship can now become a very short and simple one.

    Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?
    A : Yes, by his own admission.

    Q: What passport did he travel with?
    A: There are only three possibilities.
    1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport,
    2) He traveled with a British passport,
    3) He traveled with an Indonesian passport.

    Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled on a U.S. passport in 1981?
    A: No, it is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981.

    Conclusion:

    When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981, he was traveling on either a British or an Indonesian passport.

    If he were traveling on a British passport, that
    would be proof that he was born in Kenya on
    August 4, 1961, and not in Hawaii as he claims.

    And, if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport, that would simply that he relinquished whichever citizenship he had held, British
    or American, prior to being adopted in 1967
    by his Indonesian step-father .

    Whatever the truth of this matter, the American people need to know how he managed to become
    a “natural born” American citizen between 1981 and 2008..

    Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as indicated by his speech before Congress, and his disastrous spending plan that Congress has passed, the sooner we learn the truth, the better.

    If you don’t care that your President has not proven that he is a natural born citizen, and may be in clear violation of the Constitution, then just delete this and go back into your cocoon.

    If you do care, then send this to as many as you can!

    Fred L . Languell
    Lcdr, USN, Ret

    • David B in Texas

      Amen!! I’ve been trying to wake people up to the facts regarding this issue for a year. I believe we’re finally getting to the point where these questions may soon be answered, and we’ll be rid of this usurper.

    • mike3481

      Oscar, thank you for posting that. The truth about this mess we’re in keeps getting clearer each day.

    • Tim Roesch

      I have used the argument about the ‘no travel to Pakistan in 1981′ before but I am told this is not true.

      Where can I find information to verify that a person would not be allowed to enter Pakistan with an American passport in 1981 so I can be better armed to deal with this evasion?

    • rxsid

      There was no U.S. State Department “ban” on travel there, however…there was an “advisory” against travel there during that specific timeframe. Two entirely different things of course.

      However, it’s been alleged but not publicly substantiated (although, one or more of the eligibility lawyers may have the docs), that it was Pakistan who would have refused entry into their country…someone carrying a U.S. passport.

    • http://www.accdf.com aboutTObegin

      well said Sir, I could not have said it more eloquently than that. Thanks Oscar for sharing!

      -aTb
      Fed up Combat Vet

  • Mike Mose

    The other lawsuit has a Judge that is a former Marine.

    http://www.oilforimmigration.org/facts/?p=2487

    At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
    1. There will be a trial.
    2. It will be heard on the merits.
    3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
    4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
    5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
    6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.

  • Jeff

    This really won’t get very far. The major’s lawyer is not a qualified lawyer. She is not on the American Bar Association and is permitted to only practice law in California. She may have also broken some rules in filing for this case.

    When you make extraordinary claims, especially in the eyes of the court and the country, you need to be perfect and have a solid case without doubt. This lawsuit will fail because of the ineptitude of this lawyer.

    • David B in Texas

      This so-called “inept” lawyer has gotten further and had more success than all others who have filed similar suits. Far better than Lightfoot, Berg, Donofrio and Apuzzo. And, in case you’re not aware of this, Keyes et al v Obama et al is being heard by US District Court Judge David Carter in Santa Ana, CALIFORNIA.

    • Jeff

      The article says that this suit was filed at the US District Court in Georgia. Other articles state this as well. Where are you getting Santa Ana, California? And now that I re-read your comment it seems like you are mentioning a different case…has nothing to do with this lawsuit.

      Inept has nothing to do with getting far. There is a world record for someone filing over 1000 lawsuits but has not won a single one. Anyone can file a lawsuit. Also, you do know that Orly was the lead attorney for Lightfoot right?

      All I am saying is that if you want to take on the President of the United States you really need to have a firm backing and probably have more than one person backing you. She isn’t even on the ABA. That’s a big deal if you are trying to file law suits on a national level.

    • Kirk

      Bombshell: Orders revoked for soldier challenging prez
      Major victory for Army warrior questioning Obama’s birthplace
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104009

      Looks like she got farther than you gave her credit for!

    • Jeff

      Time will tell. Revoked orders can mean a lot of things. They could just be preparing him for a court martial, or they don’t want an officer who disobeys orders in a war zone, or they might be letting him stay to let him fight this out.

    • David B in Texas

      Jeff… the case I was referring to is Keyes et al v. Obama et al which is the one Judge David Carter is hearing in Santa Ana, California
      Major Cook’s case is a separate but related case that was filed in Georgia.

  • MinneSoCold

    Hopefully it won’t be moved to the Minnesota court. :roll:

  • rxsid

    “The major’s lawyer is not a qualified lawyer.” 1) She passed the CA bar exam, one of the toughest in the country. 2) She’s even admitted to plead cases before SCOTUS. She may not be some high priced lawyer you see on the SRM (state run media), but she most certainly is qualified. Keep in mind, she only needs to get one of them to the discovery phase.

  • rxsid

    b.t.w. don’t forget that Barry admitted to having been born with foreign citizenship (British). Couple that with the fact that his (alleged) father was never a U.S. citizen of any king (Naturalized or Natural Born). He was simply here on a student visa.

    There is no historical evidence that the framers of the Constitution intended for someone (post July 4, 1776 birth) born with foreign citizenship to be considered NBC. There is simply no known competing definition to NBC to that of Vattel’s (who’s work was even referenced allowed during the Constitutional convention itself). Barry knows he isn’t Constitutionally qualified to be the Commander in Chief…it’s why he continues to hide his past under lock and key.

  • Medaton

    Orly Taitz is a she not a he. The author of this article should get the facts straight before writing. Makes you wonder where/when the writer saw Obama’s BC.

  • rxsid

    Oh, and as far as accusing Barry of treason, Commander Fitzpatrick has filed such a federal criminal complaint months ago…http://jaghunters.blogspot.com/2009/03/tuesday-17-march-2009-to-mr.html

    http://jaghunters.blogspot.com/

    • David B in Texas

      Is this the same Commander Fitzpatrick who’s been attacking Dr. Taitz and calling her a fool?? The same Fitzpatrick whose indictment was rejected and who is now taking it out on Dr. Taitz? From all that I’ve read during the past couple of days, (and that’s a LOT) Fitzpatrick seems to think that anyone who doesn’t agree with his way of thinking is wrong and a fool.
      I’ve been reading his emails and notices (forwarded to me by a friend)and it strikes me that he’s being counter-productive and creating dissent because his ego has been bruised.

    • rxsid

      “Fitzpatrick seems to think that anyone who doesn’t agree with his way of thinking is wrong and a fool.” Yes, he’s one in the same. And, as far as him thinking his way is the only way (I don’t agree, the more avenues this is addressed from the better!)…sounds an awful lot like Mr. Donofrio…doesn’t it? Whom I support as well.

      I’ve supported, since I learned of this in 08/08, all those working to expose this issue and get this Constitutional crisis addressed!

    • rxsid

      b.t.w. I’m not sure it’s that he feels his ego is bruised, but rather that he’s very frustrated with the “system” and feels that Barry continues to usurp the Constitution.

      It is interesting to note, that apparently he is the first military ‘official’ to openly charge a sitting (alleged) POTUS with treason in our country’s history. Yet…he remains a free man. That is, he hasn’t been arrested on charges of mutiny or trying to incite mutiny (something he himself talks about). Of course, we know the reason why he hasn’t been arrested…is that Barry couldn’t afford a trial to convict Commander Fitzpatrick because it would almost certainly include a discovery phase in the defense of Cmdr. F.

  • prestonbrooks

    :!: It was obvious to me he is perpetrating fraud once I discovered he has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to hide the Cert, instead of spending 10 bucks for a certified copy of the document. What frosted the cake was his hiding of almost (I guess) 95% of all his other life records. You absolutely do not do this UNLESS you have something to hide! Common sense! While at first I was dubious of some of the claims, I am now 100% certain he is in one way or another, a usurper. I believe he will die the death of A Thousand Lawsuits: Somewhere, sometime, in some jusrisdcition, his shysters will screw up. Screw you, Soetoro, or whoever you are– you are most definitely NOT an American. Geez, the guy has more AKAs than a crack house whore. :razz:

  • Where is the Birth Certificate?

    So lets say for conversations sake this goes somewhere and Obama is found ineligible.
    Then what?
    It would mean the WHOLE election was a huge fraud and i is now null and void…right?
    What would happen?

    • rxsid

      Excellent question, one many have grappled with lately. This is, of course completely uncharted territory our country finds itself in.

      Many have speculated that Biden would assume being POTUS (based on the 20th Amendment among other things). At least, he’d be Constitutionally qualified.

      However, others have wondered how he could be POTUS since he was part of a fraudulent ticket and the Electoral College certainly would not have cast their vote (for VP) for him, were he not on Barry’s “ticket.” So, if not Biden, then Pelosi? Well, turns out she too would be complicit in this mess because she certified Barry as being eligible both at the DNC convention as well as (at least) on the Virginia state elections ballot.

      Keep in mind, that any appointment made by an illegal/Unconstitutional POTUS would be problematic as well (i.e. Cabinet positions).

      Emergency special election perhaps?

    • prestonbrooks

      A huge percentage of the Black population would riot and burn stuff down. A smaller percentage would kill and rob whites at random. Not being a redneck, just honest. Most folks would probably stay lawful.

    • rxsid

      This is one of the theories as to why nothing has been done to date. Fear! :!:

      It’s interesting to note that many (most/all?) in Congress actually do know there is an issue here as there would be zero reason for some of them (gaining in numbers) to do this:

      “2 more sign on to demand birth certificates
      House support for eligibility procedure growing”
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=103464

      “Senator calls for vetting of candidates’ eligibility
      GOP’s Coburn likes plan to require birth certificates”
      http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=101492

    • dadeo

      My speculation is that the election and Presidency would default to McCain since he would then be the only other eligible candidate who ran for President. A vote for Barry would be a vote for no one.

      McCain by a landslide and Palin has conveniently already left her other job.

    • mike3481

      Julie, get used to the phrase “Madam President”, as in Pelosi.

      She 3rd in line.

      I don’t think Biden can ascend to POTUS cos if Barry goes down, the entire Dem. ticket is fraudulent. Nobody voted for Biden, they voted for the top of the ticket, Obama.

      That won’t necessarily be a bad thing cos Pelosi’s an idiot who’ll implode as POTUS in very short order.

      Yet, one never knows what the folks in black robes will do, therefore I might be completely wrong.

    • Scoot

      If the black robes don’t do the right thing, Then We, The People will make them do the right thing. :mrgreen:

    • rxsid

      If/when Barry is finally exposed for not being Constitutionally eligible, Pelosi will be damaged politically (perhaps even hit up with charges) as she certified Barry, at least on two occasions, to be eligible.

      The fourth in line is old man Bryd who has ongoing health concerns.

      Fifth in line is Billery. However, as a Barry appointee’ there’s valid argument against her ascending.

      6th is the treas secy, again appointed by Barry.

      Only the 7th in line, Gates, was in his current cabinet position before Barry came to be. However, he too was subsequently re-nominated by Barry.

      So yeah, big tangled mess. Besides the fear factor, this is undoubtedly another reason those in power (who know darn well there is a Constitutional Crisis right now) haven’t done anything yet. They’ve no freakin idea who would legally/Constitutionally assume power.

  • Tim Roesch

    I just finished speaking to a former Army Ranger about his thoughts concerning court cases such as this one (not going to Afghanistan because one thinks the POTUS is volating the Constitution.

    The look that came into his eyes was pretty indicative of his opinion. You shouldn’t volunteer to go then back out.

    Most military I speak to feel this way, oddly enough.

    It would appear to me that this entire issue could be so easily eliminated, so easily fixed. It’s almost as if the problem is being allowed to fester.

    Why?

    Is this yet another attempt to create problems? Is Obama or his supporters holding their cards close to their vest in hopes some ‘right wing’ group does something then lay the cards on the table (assuming Obama does have the correct documents) or is this a failure of the entire political system? I mean, if this issue is wrong there should be more sentiment against it, more official sentiment.

    Yeah, that troops who are calling Obama treasonous, when he isn’t, should be arrested for inciting mutiny…if the allegations are baseless.

    It’s like a cop rolling up on two people holding guns on each other…one is a merchant, the other is a robber…then driving away with the issue unresolved.

    This entire thing, whether Obama is or is not a citizen, seems contrived somehow.

    What the hell is going on?

    It’s almost like there’s a great deal of taunting going on but the tauntee is not responding…

    Is that good or bad?
    I don’t know whom to aim my pistol at. Obama just seems too easy a target, too obvious…

    • rxsid

      “It’s almost as if the problem is being allowed to fester.

      Why?”

      Indeed…why?

      However, keep in mind, that while his hiding of his long form birth certificate is an issue, it’s not the primary issue for many of the plaintiff’s.

      One of two things is true:
      1) BHO Sr. is indeed Barry’s true biological father. Therefore, what Barry admited to on his campaign web site remains true…that he was born with foreign citizenship (British).
      or
      2) BHO Sr. really isn’t Barry’s true biological father. In which case, he lied about his past and who he really is and would probably face (at least) election fraud charges as the BHO Sr. information was stated on his campaign web site.

      Attorney Apuzzo is another “eligibility” lawyer who addresses the issue of being born with British citizenship in depth. Kerchner is his lead plaintiff (retire AF Colonel I believe).

      Obama, the President of the U.S., Is Currently Also a British Citizen
      http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/obama-president-of-us-is-currently-also_07.html

      The ‘gist’ of it is how, legally, he was born with British citizenship and that there is no publicly known information that indicates how Bary “lost” his original British citizenship or that he officially renounced it.

      http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

      Very strange times indeed!

    • copperpeony

      Your analyzing is too deep. We all know he is a userper and the people we need to focus on are his backers. The Fed Reserve, Soros, the UN..even the holier than though Pope.

      Especially Pee-Lousy. She is the one that initiated all the bills O-Fraud is pushing through. He is too stupid to put anything together. Congress doesn’t know how to read and should get copies of “reading for dummies 101″.

      You’ll need more than pone pistol.

    • mike3481

      “It’s like a cop rolling up on two people holding guns on each other…one is a merchant, the other is a robber…then driving away with the issue unresolved.”

      Tim, excellent comment…and I’m stealing it, I got a thing this Saturday with 20 or 30 people and there’s only one other Conservative besides me. If things go political I need the ammo.

      Anyways, I won’t plagiarize your comment, you have my word.

      :beer: :beer: :beer:

  • maggiew

    This lawyer has been working on this in depth.
    His whole blog is worth the read.
    http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/

    • rxsid

      Yup, Leo Donofrio. He has a lot of the ‘original’ meanings and interpretations there. VERY informative. It is, after all, his work on Grand Juries that inspired Carl Swensson ( http://www.riseupforamerica.com/ ) to create the Georgia Citizens Grand Jury (& helped with many others) that heard testimony from Dr. Taitz and many others, and whose presentments of fraud and treason are being submitted to many in ‘government’ and continue to be worked on.

  • rxsid

    FYI – :!:

    Major Cook’s orders have just been REVOKED at 1700 today!

  • prestonbrooks

    :shock: Actually, with the entire executive branch being illegal, the country would collapse to a big degree. Maybe THAT is the actual plan…….

    • Where is the Birth Certificate?

      I have thought the same :sad:

    • Randy

      Google Cloward Piven.

      “First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.”

  • rxsid

    “It looks like we won already and not just on any day, on Bastille day

    I didn’t even need to fight, the administration blinked and showed it’s cards, actually they showed that they have no cards to play, as they immediately revoked the order for major Cook. You can see below, the revocation is below, saying he doesn’t need to go.

    What does it mean? It’s proof that we have a totally illegitimate commander in chief and they will cave in each and every situation. It means that from now on any member of the military, who doesn’t like any order , needs to call Dr. Taitz, ESQ and state that he doesn’t want to follow the order, a legal action will be initiated based on Obama’s illegitimacy in office and the military will cave in. It means that for the sake of covering up for Obama and fraud perpetrated, top brass of the US military is willing to undermine integrity of the military. This has to stop.

    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

    U.S. ARMY HUMAN RESOURCES COMMAND

    1 RESERVE WAY

    ST. LOUIS, MO 63132-5200

    AHRC-PLM-S 14 JUL 2009

    ORDERS A-06-916551R

    COOK STEFAN FREDERICK EAD8 MAJ EN 155 54 7803

    4207 HARBOR LAKE DRIVE W096AA

    LUTZ FL 33558

    THE FOLLOWING ORDER IS REVOKED OR RESCINDED AS SHOWN.

    ACTION: REVOKE”

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3077

    • Mr. Standfast

      Those orders ought to raise some eye brows in the military. Case becomes moot and Obama dodges another bullet. On to the next case.

  • Hawkerdriver (Pisson the Koran

    Whatever the resultant crisis – riots,further economic downfall,etc, comes of this,we MUST be willing to put up with whatever short-term difficulty we may experience.(All the more reason to be prepared!) The long run advantages to removing the scorge that this regime represents would be worth any kind of fight,any kind of hardship compared to what I think the Kenyan has in mind AND has already implemented to a large degree for this country.

    This is the ONLY issue we have that may give some leverage to perserving what is soon to be left of our Constitution.

    :arrow: Pat,Please keep this story up on the main page as long as you can.This whole thing should be copy-able and sent on to all our contacts.

  • Sybil

    I just received this today:

    http://noiri.blogspot.com/

    pass this on

    • http://antimullah.com Alan

      Are you on our direcr mailing list? Or did you et via FR?

      Let me know at alan@antimullah.com

      cheers

    • Sybil

      Alan, No I’m not on direct mailing from you; received this from an open source intel group:

      Will follow up email to you.

      Cheers to you, no Koolaid

    • Sybil

      The link doesn’t go directly to the article I received; so search on Judge Carter and it comes up.

  • jasjfarrell

    Use Acorn’s strategy. Keep up the confusion.

    • Scoot

      Keep up the confusion, and keep distracting the Obama administration like the lefties did with Palin.

    • Specter

      What’s confusing about it?

  • Scoot

    Does anyone know about this:

    Constitution Says Hillary Clinton Not Eligible To Be Secretary of State

    http://www.rightsidenews.com/200907145475/homeland-security/constitution-says-hillary-clinton-not-eligible-to-be-secretary-of-state.html

    “Files New Motion in Lawsuit on Behalf of State Department Foreign Service Officer

    Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, announced today that on July 2 it filed a motion with a special panel of three federal judges in the District of Columbia asking the court to declare Hillary Clinton
    ineligible to serve as Secretary of State. The Judicial Watch lawsuit, filed on behalf of a U.S. Foreign Service Officer and State Department employee David C. Rodearmel, maintains that the “emoluments clause” of the U.S. Constitution prohibits Mrs. Clinton from serving as Secretary of State until January 2013, and that Mr. Rodearmel cannot be forced to serve under the former U.S. Senator, as it would violate the oath he took as a Foreign Service Officer in 1991 to “support and defend” and “bear true faith and allegiance” to the Constitution of the United States (Rodearmel v. Clinton, et al., (D. District of Columbia)).”

    *Can we get a 2 for 1 on all of this maybe?

    • Sybil

      I heard about this and it was brought up when she was selected; like most things was put on the back burner and ignored. Too bad we could use her Saul Alinsky training in reverse:

      RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)”

      Quote I found from a blogger “this admin is like a wisdom tooth, whose roots go so deep in China there is no one in authority with the pliers to pull it.”

    • Sybil

      I just do not have any confidence in the agencies that would have the authority to convice these people. From the DOJ on down.

      Think about what the Clintons have gotten away with:

      Real estate scams in Arkansas, rape charges (Paula Jones) sexual harrassement, releasing a waiver to sell upgraded satellite technolgy to China (Loral Corp), receiving hundreds of thousands in campaign contributions from the PRC (Johnny Chung), obstruction of justice (Vince Foster case), probably a lot of murders (Ref: Vince Foster, Ron Brown, Mary Mahoney just to name a few), war crimes in the attack in Yugoslavia, calling out the military at Waco (Wesley Clark) just to list a few, un-American activities during the war in Vietnam.

      Why aren’t they following Ethel and Julius Rosenberg to the electric chair?

    • Scoot

      They have had a lot of people that either worked with them, or have investigated them, die in really suspect ways also.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RplDy71vmYY&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearechange.org%2F&feature=player_embedded

    • Jon

      It’s true and accurate. The list of extra Constitutional activities is almost a mile long by now. Executive branch has no Constitutional authority to fire corporate execs, no auhority to appoint czars that are immune from oversight, no authority to move the oversight of the census to the White House. Tell me when to stop………

    • Sybil

      Scoot:

      How about the 2-3 Inspectors Generals; Gerald Walpin was fired for investigation funds that went to a AmericCorp; just so happen a lot of money from Americorps went to Public Allies (guess who’s a member of Public Allies) yep Obambi himself. Also another investigating Amtrac was fired.

      The IG’s Office is supposed to be exempt from any partician Congressional politics.

  • Specter

    Orders revoked!!

    That’s fucking huge people and the sirens need to be turned on high.

    This is something we all cannot let go, it must be the rights ‘Mission Accomplished’. I for one will skull-fuck every liberal into the ground with this FACT.
    I won’t be a high road principled geek about it either and I implore each of you to be rude, frank and unmoving on the topic.

    This isn’t about who’s nicer and who’s got morals.

    Skull fuck them all thru the ear hole with extreme prejudice!!

    • Jon

      I think that’s called “Aural sex”.

  • http://SteveR Paul Phillips

    I agree with Mike 3481, Obamas brother is a high muck-
    muck in Kenya, as Mike said his Grandma said he was born in Kenya, why do you think she was murdered? You
    will never find his birth certificate in Kenya, probably destroyed by now? Paul, Lt.ol. USAF (ret

  • PatriotofPast(Thomas)

    :gun: Here is The TRUTH!!!!
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104009

    Fuck Him!!!

  • PatriotofPast(Thomas)

    I do hope everyone can see how deep this goes?
    When the COMPLETE TRUTH is in the open, every Senator,every Congressman who voted WITH Obama on any Legislation could be charged with Treason. :cool:
    That is how you CLEAN HOUSE ! :gun:

  • rxsid

    Retaliation…

    “Department of Defense orders soldier fired for challenging prez
    Army warrior terminated from job after questioning Obama eligibility

    The Department of Defense has compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.

    According to the CEO of Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services, an agency of the Department of Defense, the federal agency has compelled the termination of Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook.”
    …
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=104044

  • rxsid

    Now a follow up injunction…

    Application for injunction
    MAJ. GEN. CAROL DEAN CHILDERS,

    LT. COL. DAVID EARL GRAEF,

    MAJOR STEFAN FREDERICK COOK,

    Plaintiffs,

    v.

    COLONEL LOUIS B. WINGATE, Civil Action:

    COLONEL WANDA L. GOOD, 4:09-cv-00082-CDL

    COLONEL THOMAS D. MACDONALD,

    DR. ROBERT M. GATES, UNITED

    STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, Rule 65 Application for

    BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto Preliminary Injunction

    PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES,

    Defendants.

    APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

    Plaintiff Major Stefan Frederick Cook previously received from the Defendants in this cause what appear to be facially valid orders from Colonel Wanda L. Good mobilizing him to active duty with the United States Army in Afghanistan on July 15-18, 2009 (Exhibit A). Plaintiff filed his Original Application for TRO on Friday July 10, 2009, and on Tuesday, July 14, 2009 his deployment to Afghanistan was revoked by order of Colonel Louis B. Wingate, apparently Col. Good’s successor at Army Human Resources Command in St. Louis (Exhibit B). This unexpected action does not in any way, shape or form, “moot” the application for TRO, which is here amended and resubmitted as an Application for Preliminary Injunction, covering both the possibility of future orders and to prevent negative collateral consequences such as retaliation against Major Stefan Frederick Cook (which have already begun) including possible violations of the general Federal and specific military whistleblower acts, as well as the First and Ninth Amendment civil rights of Major Stefan Frederick Cook to challenge the chain of command in the U.S military. It is obvious that this case has the potential to be converted into a class action…[snip]

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3120

  • Eric

    Either the miliatry, of their own accord, revoked Maj. Cooks orders (which probably means there are some high ups in the military leadership who have the same concerns about POTUS or POTUS asked miliatry brass to revoke his order (possibly as a legal move to attempt to say now that Cook is not being called up, the case is irrelevant).

    This should be an issue the Brass needs to force Obama to address, perhaps doing a Joint Chiefs news conference, publically asking POTUS to provide proof.
    SOmetimes , as in Hoduras, it is the military that needs to enforce the Constitution when the policitians and the courts won’t. The Joint CHiefs could publically force the issue on Obama.

  • rxsid

    UPDATE:

    Cook v Obama Complaint filed today

    Tampa, Florida 33602-3800

    MAJOR STEFAN FREDERICK COOK, §

    Plaintiff, §

    § Civil Action Number:

    v. §

    § 8:09-cv-01382-RAL-EAJ

    SIMTECH, INC., §

    LARRY GRICE, CEO OF SIMTECH, §

    DEFENSE SECURITY SERVICES, §

    COLONEL LOUIS B. WINGATE, §

    DR. ROBERT M. GATES, UNITED § TRIAL-BY-JURY DEMANDED

    STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, § Pursuant to 28 USC §1861 and

    BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto § Seventh Amendment

    PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES, §

    Defendants. §

    COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

    1. Comes now the Plaintiff Stefan Frederick Cook with this Complaint, Declaratory Judgment, and Application for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to preserve the status quo and prevent irreparable injury to his career.

    More here: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3333

  • http://maps.google.com/maps/place?cid=2321288851343183925 Drina

    Paul Hastings & Janofsky Atlanta Lawyer
    600 Peachtree St NE # 2400, Atlanta, GA 30308-2222
    (404)815-2400