Home  »  General  »  UPDATED: La Guardia Evacuated Over Potential Terrorist With Bomb – New Video Added

UPDATED: La Guardia Evacuated Over Potential Terrorist With Bomb – New Video Added



Aug 1, 2009 7 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

20770138
Live shot of evacuation scene

NEW YORK — The main terminal at New York’s LaGuardia Airport was evacuated Saturday morning, stranding hundreds of passengers, after a man entered the building with a fake bomb in a bag, police said.

The terminal was evacuated at around 5:30 a.m. Saturday after the man approached security in the airport’s C concourse, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey spokesman John Kelly said.

It wasn’t clear if the man made a threat, but security officials said he “was just acting crazy,” Kelly said. The man’s name was not released.

The device in the man’s bag was a few batteries and wires, but was not dangerous, police said.

Police later reopened the main terminal, and passengers began re-entering shortly before 9 a.m.

It was not immediately clear how many flights were delayed or canceled by the evacuation, but the airport’s Web site said passengers should check with their airlines for information.

Among the stranded passengers were 12-year-old Samantha Casady and her 10-year-old brother, Patrick, of Norwich, Conn., who were supposed to fly out to Dallas at 7:15 a.m. by themselves to visit relatives.

Their mother, Colleen, said she and her husband were accompanying their children through a long security screening line when there was a commotion “and just a swarm of TSA.”

Casady said she later saw a man in handcuffs, surrounded by police.

The family was initially directed to go to another security gate, but it was closed, “and a few minutes later, they evacuated the building,” she said.

The evacuation also meant that Irma Quidore, of Denville, N.J., had to delay a trip to Monterrey, Mexico, for a second time with her two daughters, Sofia, 6, and Isabella, 3.

They had originally planned to fly out on Thursday, but a delay that would have forced them to miss a connecting flight prompted them to reschedule their trip for Saturday, Quidore said.

“I guess we’re going to make the trip to Mexico, but a little bit late,” Sofia said as she pushed her little sister in a stroller toward the terminal.

(AP)


  • bill-tb

    I am always amused how the threat is isolated inside, meanwhile, a very large cluster of soft targets is formed outside. Can you say much easier target.

    Most times government actions lack one simple ingredient — Common sense.

    As if being outside the building unprotected is better than being inside the building.

  • http://batnutz.blogspot.com repsac3

    You’ll have to be more specific, bill-tb…

    Because, whether the “suspicious package” is an explosive device or a noxious gas, outside & away from it is better than inside the building…

    Further, I know of no situation where the evacuation from the building holding the suspicious package has lead to significant casualties of these soft targets.

    (I mean sure, if you’re in the free fire zone of a hot conflict, maybe… But in NYC (or anywhere in America, in the last hundred or so years)? I’m not sure you’re take on common sense is either common or sense.)

    What would you have security personnel do with an airport or skyscraper full of people, after finding a potential explosive device or poison gas canister? With all due respect, I’m pretty sure that evacuating the innocent civilians is the correct way to go, at least until we see a rash of terrorist/madman sharpshooters, pickin’ off the evacuees as they hit the streets. (Now, if you’re suggesting we move them to a sheltered area, (a different building, a barricaded area outside) away from the potential zone of impact, maybe… But staying in the likely danger zone? I don’t think that idea holds water…)

  • Jarhead68

    This was just a warm up to get the sheeple into the panic mode so they will be easily led to the Obamacamps. Totalitarianism is right on the doorstep.
    We need to get rid of Pelosky, Reidsky, Doddsky, Franksky, Durbansky and the whole lot of ‘em, RINOs included…especially RINOs.

  • jack

    Sounds like they’re probing security… I really don’t see any other reason (other than to instill fear) for a person to walk into an airport with a fake bomb.

    • tolyouso

      My thought exactly.

  • vincenzo4

    It’s called a “Hoax Bomb”, and yes can be used to test security. My experience is that these are carried by mental persons. They even mail them sometimes.

    • jack

      I understand that. The question is, are these people who may have mental issues possibly provoked into being the guinea pig for terrorists or people who want to do us harm in general? Maybe its a little far-fetched, but I wouldn’t entirely rule something like that out. Its not like Islamic terrorists use children to get through checkpoints only to blow the vehicle and kids in it up or anything… /sarcasm off