Aug 23, 2009 11 Comments ›› Pat Dollard
By Mark Steyn in National Review Online:
The other day, wending my way from Woodsville, N.H., 40 miles south to Plymouth, I came across several â€œstimulusâ€ projects â€” every few miles, and heralded by a two-tone sign, a hitherto rare sight on Granite State highways. The orange strip at the top said â€œPUTTING AMERICA BACK TO WORKâ€ with a silhouette of a man with a shovel, and the green part underneath informed you that what you were about to see was a â€œPROJECT FUNDED BY THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT ACT.â€ There then followed a few yards of desolate, abandoned, scarified pavement, followed by an â€œEND OF ROAD WORKSâ€ sign, until the next â€œstimulusâ€ project a couple of bends down a quiet rural blacktop.
I donâ€™t know why one of the least fiscally debauched states in the Union needs funds from â€œthe American Recovery and Reinvestment Actâ€ to repair random stretches of highway, especially stretches that were perfectly fine until someone came along to dig them up in order to access â€œstimulusâ€ funding. I would have asked one of those men with a shovel, as depicted on the sign, but there were none to be found. Usually in New Hampshire, they dig up the road, and re-grade or repave it, while the flagmen stand guard until itâ€™s all done. But here a certain federal torpor seemed to hang in the eerie silence.
Still, what do I know? Evidently, itâ€™s stimulated the sign-making industry, putting America back to work by putting up â€œPUTTING AMERICA BACK TO WORKâ€ signs every 200 yards across the land. And at 300 bucks a pop, the signage alone should be enough to launch an era of unparalleled prosperity, assuming Americaâ€™s gilded sign magnates donâ€™t spend their newfound wealth on Bahamian vacations and European imports. Perhaps if the president were to have his All-Seeing O logo lovingly hand-painted onto each sign, it would stimulate the economy even more, if only when they were taken down and auctioned on eBay.
Meanwhile, in Brazil, India, China, Japan, and much of continental Europe the recession has ended. In the second quarter this year, both the French and German economies grew by 0.3 percent, while the U.S. economy shrank by 1 percent. How can that be? Unlike America, France and Germany had no government stimulus worth speaking of, the Germans declining to go the Obama route on the quaint grounds that they couldnâ€™t afford it. They did not invest in the critical signage-in-front-of-holes-in-the-road sector. And yet their recession has gone away. Of the worldâ€™s biggest economies, only the U.S., Britain, and Italy are still contracting. All three are big stimulators, though Gordon Brown and Silvio Berlusconi canâ€™t compete with Obamaâ€™s $800 billion porkapalooza. The president has borrowed more money to spend to less effect than anybody on the planet.
Actually, when I say â€œto less effect,â€ thatâ€™s not strictly true: Thanks to Obama, one of the least indebted developed nations is now one of the most indebted â€” and getting ever more so. Weâ€™ve become the third most debt-ridden country after Japan and Italy. According to last monthâ€™s IMF report, general government debt as a percentage of GDP will rise from 63 percent in 2007 to 88.8 percent this year and to 99.8 percent of GDP next year.
Of course, the president retains his formidable political skills, artfully distracting attention from his stimulus debacle with his health-care debacle. But there are diminishing returns to his serial thousand-page trillion-dollar boondoggles. They may be too long for your representatives to bother reading before passing into law, but, whatever the intricacies of Section 417(a) xii on page 938, people are beginning to spot what all this stuff has in common: Heâ€™s spending your future. And by â€œfutureâ€ I donâ€™t mean 2070, 2060, 2040, but the day after tomorrow. Democrats can talk about only raising taxes on â€œthe rich,â€ but more and more Americans are beginning to figure out what percentage of them will wind up in â€œthe richest 5 percentâ€ before this binge is over. According to Gallup, nearly 70 percent of Americans now expect higher taxes under Obama.
But the silver-tongued salesman sails on. Why be scared of a government health program? After all, says the president, â€œMedicare is a government program that works really well,â€ and if â€œweâ€™re able to get something right like Medicare,â€ we should have more â€œconfidenceâ€ about being able to do it for everyone.
On the other hand, says the president, Medicare is â€œunsustainableâ€ and â€œrunning out of money.â€
By the way, unlike your run-of-the-mill politicianâ€™s contradictory statements, these werenâ€™t made a year or even a week apart, but during the same presidential speech in Portsmouth, N.H. At any rate, in order to â€œcontrol costsâ€ Obama says we need to introduce a new trillion-dollar government entitlement. Itâ€™s a good thing heâ€™s the smartest president of all time and the greatest orator since Socrates because otherwise one might easily confuse him with some birdbrained Bush type. But, if we take him at his word, then a trillion-dollar public expenditure that â€œcontrols costsâ€ presumably means heâ€™s planning on reducing private health expenditure â€” such as, say, your insurance plan â€” by at least a trillion. Or heâ€™ll be raising a trillion dollarsâ€™ worth of revenue. Either way, under Obama nothing is certain but death panels and taxes â€” i.e., a vast enervating statism, and the confiscation of the fruits of your labors required to pay for it.
Thatâ€™s why the â€œstimulusâ€ flopped. It didnâ€™t just fail to stimulate, it actively deterred stimulation, because it was the first explicit signal to America and the world that the Democratsâ€™ political priorities overrode everything else. If youâ€™re a business owner, why take on extra employees when capâ€™nâ€™trade is promising increased regulatory costs and health â€œreformâ€ wants to stick you with an 8 percent tax for not having a company insurance plan? Obamaâ€™s leviathan sends a consistent message to business and consumers alike: When heâ€™s spending this crazy, maybe the smart thing for you to do is hunker down until the dustâ€™s settled and you get a better sense of just how broke heâ€™s going to make you. For this level of â€œcommunity organization,â€ there arenâ€™t enough of â€œthe richâ€ to pay for it. That leaves you.
For Obama, government health care is the fastest way to a permanent left-of-center political culture in which all elections and most public discourse will be conducted on Democratic terms. Itâ€™s no surprise that the president canâ€™t make a coherent economic or medical argument for Obamacare, because thatâ€™s not what itâ€™s about â€” and for all his cool, he canâ€™t quite disguise that. Apropos a new poll, the Associated Press reports that Americans â€œare losing faith in Barack Obama.â€
â€œLosing faithâ€? Oh, no! Fall on your knees and beseech the One: â€œGive me a sign, O Lord!â€
But he has. Theyâ€™re all along empty highways across rural New Hampshire: â€œThis Massive Expansion of Wasteful Statism Brought to You by Obama Marketing, Inc.â€