Home  »  Economy  »  Obama To Wall Street: Reckless Behavior Is My Job, Not Yours

Obama To Wall Street: Reckless Behavior Is My Job, Not Yours



Sep 14, 2009 11 Comments ›› Erik Wong

Obama

NEW YORK – Lecturing Wall Street on its own turf, President Barack Obama warned financial leaders not to use the recovering economy to race back into “reckless behavior” that could cause a new meltdown. He declared that a bailout-weary public will not break their fall again.

Obama insisted Monday that there is an urgent need for tighter financial regulation, and he cautioned his audience not to try to block it. He spoke on the first anniversary of the collapse of the Lehman Brothers investment bank, the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history and a stark reminder of the financial crisis that spread into a deep recession despite huge federal bailouts of major companies.

“It is neither right nor responsible after you’ve recovered with the help of your government to shirk your obligation to the goal of wider recovery, a more stable system, and a more broadly shared prosperity,” Obama said in a stern bid to boost his regulation proposals.

The president’s speech reflected public sentiment that taxpayers were immeasurably harmed from last year’s financial collapse—and that, barring change, it could happen again. As investment giants return to profit, millions of Americans are still coping with unemployment, home foreclosures and retirement portfolios that got washed away in the storm.

For symbolic emphasis, Obama spoke from venerable Federal Hall on Wall Street.

“Unfortunately, there are some in the financial industry who are misreading this moment,” Obama told a quiet audience of leaders from the investment sector.

“So I want them to hear my words,” Obama said. “We will not go back to the days of reckless behavior and unchecked excess that was at the heart of this crisis. … Those on Wall Street cannot resume taking risks without regard for consequences.”

Afterward, he joined former President Bill Clinton for lunch at a New York restaurant. The White House announced Obama would address the annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative Sept. 22 while in New York for the United Nations General Assembly meeting.

The public is still edgy about Wall Street and the economy. A year after the meltdown, seven of 10 Americans lack confidence that the federal government has taken safeguards to prevent another financial industry meltdown, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.

Yet Obama’s reach goes only so far; his bid for huge regulatory change is up to Congress.

The president’s plan has yet to gain serious traction on Capitol Hill, as Democratic leaders have been consumed by the health care debate and staff members are still wrestling with the complexities. The plan is being fought by a determined financial services lobby with a major assist from big business groups, and infighting among regulators who oversee the various portions of the sprawling financial architecture has further slowed the process.

But the sluggish pace is expected to pick up in coming weeks. Democrats aim to stick to their promise of completing the bill by year’s end, a timeline Obama badly wants to keep, but they face long odds.

Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, who once considered being Obama’s commerce secretary, was among GOP lawmakers who responded to the president’s message with caution.

He said, “We must be wary of the reality that—in an attempt to address yesterday’s failures—Congress will put in place regulatory schemes which will fundamentally undermine risk taking.”

Anticipating such criticism, Obama shot back against those pushing for less regulation.

“Do you really believe that the absence of sound regulation one year ago was good for the financial system?” he said. “Do you believe the resulting decline in markets and wealth and unemployment, the wrenching hardship that families are going through all across the country, was somehow good for our economy?”

He also told Wall Street that it had no need to wait for new laws to begin helping consumers with straight talk in the meantime.

Much of Obama’s speech amounted to a recap of his proposals, first outlined in June.

He has sought tougher capital requirements for banks, arguing that banks’ buying of exotic financial products without keeping enough cash in reserve was a key cause of the crisis. He wants more openness for the markets in which banks trade the most complex products.

Obama’s plan also would give the Federal Reserve new oversight powers and impose conditions designed to discourage companies from getting too big. And he proposes a consumer protection agency to make rules for financial products, so people know what they’re buying.

The House Financial Services Committee, led by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who supports much of Obama’s plan, is expected in October to take up the first piece of the legislation, one that would establish an agency focused on consumer protections. The panel has already passed legislation intended to curb excessive compensation at financial institutions.

Obama’s plan could face significant revisions in the Senate, where Democrats have joined Republicans in questioning whether more power should be given to the Federal Reserve.

Industry is working particularly hard to kill or at least weaken the consumer protection agency idea, which it says will lead to increased costs for consumers, and various corporate interests are fighting the new rules for complex financial transactions, arguing they could stifle legitimate commerce.

Meanwhile, Obama made sure to dole out credit Monday—to his own administration.

He introduced his economic team and said its “outstanding leadership” of a financial stability plan helped the system emerge from crisis.

Obama warned against complacency but said: “We can be confident that the storms of the past two years are beginning to break.”

(AP)


  • Bobby E

    Glad to see this here now. I commented on this elsewhere and will only say how hypocritical it is … that’s the nicest thing I can say.

  • TerryTate

    What “recovering economy” is this fool talking about?

  • Lottie

    He is the one we were not waiting for!! I wouldn’t trust him to take my trash out!! He cann’t take any credit for our economy trying to come back! He has done everything to ruion our country and the most affected are the working Americans, the farmers who have not been able to grow food for us and the rest of the world we feed. We need to cut off our taxes to the feds and keep it in the states to make sure we can take care of ourselves.

  • copperpeony

    Excellent idea Lottie..keep the taxes within the state.

    AS for reckless behavior, I agree with the Joker…he has been reckless since his momma’s egg met up with whoever the daddy is sperm. The whole freaking family was reckless and corrupt!! No surprise here.

  • BTJoe112

    :beer:

  • Lock and Load

    I wonder if the stock market is going to tank again… every time this fool starts talking about more regulation, those that understand what that really means, and stand to lose from it, get jittery and turn the market upside down… :???:

  • Bobby E

    I’m confused myself, Terry. One day it’s a ‘long road to recovery’ and ‘high unemployment for years to come’, then the next day it’s ‘boom days’ coming TOMORROW. TurboTax Tim Geithner made conflicting statements all in the same day. Just how much money did he waste on that education he got? Private industry would have fired incompetents like this before their three-month trial period was over.

  • ZenDraken

    Well, the stock market cannot rise significantly, unless:

    1. There is another bubble (real estate/dot-com), which requires credit to be available, which it’s not. And being a bubble, it will pop and crash, really hard this time. Obama is trying to talk up a bubble, let’s hope it doesn’t happen.

    2. There is a very dramatic increase in the energy supply, which means a very dramatic decrease in energy prices, which makes everything more affordable.

    3. There is some new technology out there that goes into production, that everybody simply *must* have. Flying cars? Mr Fusion? Anti-Aging pill? Sexbots?

    There may be other possibilities, but since none of them are likely, the stock market will not rise. And that means it must either stagnate or fall. And then *eventually*, it will rise again.

    Just more proof that economics is the dismal science.

  • cold soldier

    We tried that in 1861

  • Lock and Load

    :arrow: Zen Draken
    I’m not looking for giant gains, just consistent gains, that will come over time as people become more confident in the economy. Problem is, the threat of more regulation (when the existing regulations were ignored by Congress and others to get us into the hole) only breeds fear and uncertainty, which keeps the market weak as people don’t want to invest or take risk. :roll:
    Your point (2) could happen very easily if oil drilling was allowed to take place. :???:

  • Lock and Load

    :arrow: Mertin
    Uh, what is this “you guys” stuff? Who are you addressing? Perhaps you are a visitor? I don’t recall typical “residents” of this website being against ANY regulation; I certainly am not.
    The point is the regulations that were already in place were not followed. Guide rails were in place, they were ignored. The gross incompetence lays at the feet of Democrat policy which allowed the mortgage crisis to fester by forcing lending to unqualified individuals, hence the housing crash and sub-prime mortgage situation. Instead of heaping on more regulation, let’s enforce the existing ones, and get rid of politicians who insist on forcing their sense of social justice on the banking system :!:
    And by the way, don’t bring Madoff into this argument, as it only makes my point… the SEC had ample regulations in place to smash Madoff, but they were “asleep at the wheel” as this article clearly indicates.
    http://blogs.findlaw.com/courtside/2009/09/post.html