Comments on: Absurdity: SCOTUS To Decide Which States The Second Amendment Applies To http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/ The War Starts Here Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:16:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Dr. Jerry http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543920 Dr. Jerry Mon, 05 Oct 2009 16:55:40 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543920 If the SCOTUS rules in favor of Chicago and Oak Hill, and local municipalities can threfore preclude the right of citizens to "keep and bear arms" well...I don't care! I will continue to carry a handgun where ever I please and whenever I please, in violation of the law if necessary. I don't want to go to jail, but I will if I have to. I don't want to shoot it out with local lawenforcement, but I will if I have to. Somewhere the line must be drawn, and the Second Ammendment has to be that line. I am ready to defend my right to be armed to the death, if need be I can start today! once we are unarmed by our government, then we are henceforth doomed to whatever their nefarious whims and wills might then be. I aint gonna live that way! How about you? If the SCOTUS rules in favor of Chicago and Oak Hill, and local municipalities can threfore preclude the right of citizens to “keep and bear arms” well…I don’t care! I will continue to carry a handgun where ever I please and whenever I please, in violation of the law if necessary.

I don’t want to go to jail, but I will if I have to. I don’t want to shoot it out with local lawenforcement, but I will if I have to. Somewhere the line must be drawn, and the Second Ammendment has to be that line.

I am ready to defend my right to be armed to the death, if need be I can start today! once we are unarmed by our government, then we are henceforth doomed to whatever their nefarious whims and wills might then be. I aint gonna live that way!

How about you?

]]> By: Lone Wolf http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543674 Lone Wolf Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:04:23 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543674 http://www.ammunitiontogo.com/catalog1/index.php/cName/357-magnum-hollow-point-ammo http://www.ammunitiontogo.com/catalog1/index.php/cName/357-magnum-hollow-point-ammo

]]> By: prestonsbrooks http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543637 prestonsbrooks Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:58:47 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543637 :arrow: :neutral: Read the 14th Amendment. :arrow: :neutral: Read the 14th Amendment.

]]> By: John DeFrees http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543598 John DeFrees Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:36:44 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543598 Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it. Thanks. Glad you enjoyed it.

]]> By: GRIZZ http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543540 GRIZZ Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:53:49 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543540 Will their decision stop anyone from carrying? Not me Will their decision stop anyone from carrying? Not me

]]> By: GRIZZ http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543539 GRIZZ Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:51:58 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543539 Box of 50 Box of 50

]]> By: GRIZZ http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543538 GRIZZ Sun, 04 Oct 2009 18:51:10 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543538 I can get S&B 158gr FMJ for $16.99 a box.38 special for the same price. I can get S&B 158gr FMJ for $16.99 a box.38 special for the same price.

]]> By: Steven D http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543482 Steven D Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:06:04 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543482 If the Supreme Court didn't take up the issue, the previous ruling, i.e., allowing Chicago and Oak Park gun bans to stand, would stand. So, SCOTUS must over-rule the 7th Circuit Court ruling. If the Supreme Court didn’t take up the issue, the previous ruling, i.e., allowing Chicago and Oak Park gun bans to stand, would stand.

So, SCOTUS must over-rule the 7th Circuit Court ruling.

]]> By: David http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543280 David Sun, 04 Oct 2009 06:50:20 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543280 Was DC even in existance when the Constitution and Bill of Rights were passed? Wasn't the first Capital in Philadelphia? List of capitals in the United States From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Washington, D.C. has been the capital of the United States since 1800. Eight other cities have served as the meeting place for Congress and are therefore considered to have once been the capital of the United States. In addition, each of the 50 U.S. states and several territories of the United States maintains its own capital. Was DC even in existance when the Constitution and Bill of Rights were passed? Wasn’t the first Capital in Philadelphia?

List of capitals in the United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Washington, D.C. has been the capital of the United States since 1800. Eight other cities have served as the meeting place for Congress and are therefore considered to have once been the capital of the United States. In addition, each of the 50 U.S. states and several territories of the United States maintains its own capital.

]]> By: ZenDraken http://patdollard.com/2009/10/absurdity-scotus-to-decide-which-states-the-second-amendment-applies-to/#comment-543178 ZenDraken Sun, 04 Oct 2009 01:43:09 +0000 http://patdollard.com/?p=92381#comment-543178 So, does this mean all jurisdictions smaller than states can now ignore the Bill of Rights? So, New York City can now declare an official state religion? Denver can now suppress free speech? San Francisco can now search and seize private property at will? Those are all "subordinate bodies of a state" and can do these things, per Easterbrook's reasoning. So, does this mean all jurisdictions smaller than states can now ignore the Bill of Rights?

So, New York City can now declare an official state religion? Denver can now suppress free speech? San Francisco can now search and seize private property at will?

Those are all “subordinate bodies of a state” and can do these things, per Easterbrook’s reasoning.

]]>