Home  »  General  »  “Are You From This Planet?”: Airport Security Rules Changed After Ron Paul Aide Detained

“Are You From This Planet?”: Airport Security Rules Changed After Ron Paul Aide Detained



Nov 11, 2009 6 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

through-airport-security

Washington Times:

An angry aide to Rep. Ron Paul, an iPhone and $4,700 in cash have forced the Transportation Security Administration to quietly issue two new rules telling its airport screeners they can only conduct searches related to airplane safety.

In response, the American Civil Liberties Union is dropping its lawsuit on behalf of Steve Bierfeldt, the man who was detained in March and who recorded the confrontation on his iPhone as TSA and local police officers spent half an hour demanding answers as to why he was carrying the money through Lambert-St. Louis International Airport.

The new rules, issuedin September and October, tell officers “screening may not be conducted to detect evidence of crimes unrelated to transportation security” and that large amounts of cash don’t qualify as suspicious for purposes of safety.

“We had been hearing of so many reports of TSA screeners engaging in wide-ranging fishing expeditions for illegal activities,” said Ben Wizner, a staff lawyer for the ACLU, pointing to reports of officers scanning pill-bottle labels to see whether the passenger was the person who obtained the prescription as one example.

He said screeners get a narrow exception to the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches, strictly to keep weapons and explosives off planes, not to help police enforce other laws.

TSA was created in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to boost screening at airports, but the young agency has repeatedly bumped heads against civil libertarians, who argue officers overstep their authority.

TSA spokeswoman Lauren Gaches said the new “internal directives” are meant to ensure their screeners are consistent. She acknowledged the policy on large sums of cash had changed, but wouldn’t provide a copy of either document. She said the directives would not be released unless a Freedom Of Information Act request was submitted by The Washington Times.

“TSA routinely assesses its policies and screening procedures to ensure the highest levels of security nationwide,” she said. “Currency alone is not a threat, and TSA does not restrict the amount of currency a traveler may carry through the checkpoint.”

TSA had earlier defended the search, though it had criticized officers’ abusive behavior.

The ACLU released the September directive because TSA included it in a public court filing, but said when TSA gave it the October directive it was instructed not to publish it.

That second directive tells screeners that “traveling with large amounts of currency is not illegal,” and that to the extent bulk quantities of cash warrant searching, it is only to further security objectives, the ACLU said.

The ACLU sued in June on behalf of Mr. Bierfeldt, who was detained after he sent a metal box with $4,700 in cash and checks through an X-ray machine at the airport.

He had the cash as part of his duties as director of development for the Campaign for Liberty, the offshoot group that Mr. Paul, Texas Republican, created from his failed presidential bid.

Mr. Bierfeldt recorded audio of the confrontation on his iPhone, including threats, insults and repeated questions about where he obtained the money.

“Are you from this planet?” one officer told him, while another accused him of acting like a child for asking what part of the law forced him to answer their questions about the money.

“The TSA has stated that their policy is going to change, which is basically what we were after all along,” Mr. Bierfeldt told The Washington Times.

Some civil liberties activists speculate that TSA wants passengers to be uncertain about its procedures because it gives more power to the authorities in an encounter.

The new directives don’t affect a situation where a TSA officer, in the performance of a regular screening, comes across evidence of illegal activity, such as a bag of illicit drugs.


  • Tyler520

    As much as I despise Ron Paul and his devotees, harrassing someone for carrying cash is ridiculous.

    However, the TSA had a very poor choice of words when stating, “screening may not be conducted to detect evidence of crimes unrelated to transportation security;” This implies that they could not detain someone for carrying a brick of cocain, as well.

    • Jarhead68

      Spot on, Tyler…

    • More than Duty

      Bullshit, Ron Paul gives this country an ideal of America as it was intended. Before the super rich and communist started shredding it. He’s one of the few holding our country together. Inless you like RINO’s and Liberal (Chinese) government then I would suggest getting your fact straight. The fact is, 1% of this country went to war, while the rest of these jokers sat back finger fucking our girls. Honor has been shreded to bits, commies our surrounding our ranks. Men of this country will either need to rally around this countries patriotism. Fort Hood, my friend Trevor Nieman (a Fallujah Vet), was stabbed my illegal mexicans, then again beat to death by a hammer. Wake the fuck up people, we either need to start getting our hands dirty because the enemy is playing us against all our honor!

    • http://buffalokill.com Chad

      If you despise Ron Paul, you despise the U.S. Constitution. He’s the only one who is fully in agreement with the framers.

  • Sgsaur

    The TSA is a joke. Most are minimum wage SWAT wannabes that couldn’t get a job as a real cop (or even a crossing guard). I used to fly a lot on business and have seen the TSA in action across the country. I have ZERO respect for them. We used to call them “Ridge’s Retards”. Not much has changed for the better since then. In my 45 years on this planet, I have never seen more incompetence, arrogance and outright abuse of power as I have seen from TSA personnel. I can give dozens of examples, but for brevity’s sake I’ll not. I’ll simply ask this question – Do you feel safer flying now than you did before the TSA was formed? I don’t. Is flying more of a pain in the ass than it was before the TSA was formed? Hell yes.

    Ben Franklin had it right when he said “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” The TSA needs to go away and be replaced by private firms (as there were before 9-11) that don’t have federal arrest powers coupled with shoe size-level IQs. Profiling needs to commence immediately. Everyone needs to be screened, but 20-year-old Achmed and his one-way ticket with no luggage needs to be looked at MUCH more closely than 88-year-old Granny Mae traveling with her Christmas presents.

    Of course, that’s just my opinion. I could be wrong.

  • Eric

    My favorite TSA story is of the 20 yr old TSA employee named Muhamed in Chicago who had a huge line (30+ min)would look at a few people, then just wave 5-6 through without checking their ID. He did this repeatedly right in front of his supervisor who was doing the same thing on the other side.

    Muhamed could wave anyone he wanted through… just get in his line. AND WE PAY FOR THIS???!!!!!!