Comments on: Dem: Bush Intentionally Let Osama Escape To Justify Iraq War

By: Sully

Sully — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:17:28 +0000

That’s accusing Bush of treason.

By: GRIZZ

GRIZZ — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:54:13 +0000

I hate to tweak anybody here,but I believe we could have killed this POS several times and didnt.
nuff said

By: Sully

Sully — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:12:57 +0000

I’m plenty “seasoned” and your argument, such as it is, that Bush screwed the pooch’, sucks.
K?
Did you listen up and good?

By: lastconservativeblackmanonearth

lastconservativeblackmanonearth — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:47:37 +0000

… one more thing, Sully: in these times, you’d better be standing for principles–not parties … ’cause if you don’t … prepare yourself to be sucker-punched and bum-rushed by the likes of RINOs and other infiltrators.

By: lastconservativeblackmanonearth

lastconservativeblackmanonearth — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:33:45 +0000

This is not ‘analysis’ … this is what had factually occurred. Obviously, you’re not ‘seasoned’ in years enough to remember any of what I’m referring to, so I’ll just leave it at that.

By: Sully

Sully — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:26:06 +0000

That’s a pretty fucked up ‘analysis’ you got going there man.
Sounds like cleaned up Hinchey.

By: lastconservativeblackmanonearth

lastconservativeblackmanonearth — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:34:15 +0000

OK, people: listen up and listen good.

While I don’t agree with Congressman Hinchey’s conclusion *why* Bin Laden was not apprehended/killed, I do clearly recall the news events surrounding the day Bin Laden escaped the Predator drones.

I *do* recall that Predator video of white-clothed men running in the night for their vehicles after recognizing they were targeted … and I *do* recall that approval to take out those targets by the drone operator had to be relayed back to HQ *at the Pentagon* … and by then, the suspects had escaped or dispersed.

It was widely suspected that Bin Laden was in that group. It was at that point that I concluded the U.S. war effort was not serious, and even that we would lose, particularly because I was a believer in the Rumsfeld theory of “tech will take ‘em out” and that we really didn’t need many ‘boots on the ground’.

So obviously, the failure/refusal to take out any and all threats — as in the suspected Bin Laden case — really took the wind out of my sails.

People: an army has 2 weeks … TWO WEEKS … to muscle through the “fog of war”. In not, then hunker down, and prepare yourself for body-bags and flag-draped coffins.

We could have won this … we didn’t … so now, the revisionists are having a field day. The Buck stops with “W” … he must accept the loss in this.

Listen: I’m not some whining wuss weeping in the dark of the night. The same d*mn thing happend back in Desert Shield/Storm, when Shwarzkopf had Saddam and his mistresses in his sights. He was waved off by Bush 41 (and Colin Powell).

I’ll close by saying the U.S. is turning into a ‘paper tiger’. An Army that can’t kill … can’t win.

By: vincenzo4

vincenzo4 — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:12:56 +0000

Yeah Holder let his watchdogs jump right on that, didn’t he?

By: vincenzo4

vincenzo4 — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:12:28 +0000

Know what, if you wanna charge Bush, do it slick. Do it. Charge him and I promise you he will get pissed enough to tongue lash all of you and bring up things no Democrat wants to come to light. Enough of these cowards.

Has anyone who contributes to this blog even noticed the upscope of world tensions since Obama has taken office? Every tryannical nation is emboldened, arming and challenging us and we do absolutely NOTHING.

The threat nations absolutely know they do as they please-there will be NO confrontation from this administration. This will worsen and worsen again like the 1990s when if mitogate the blood of innocents and our brother and sister fighting men could have been either avoided or mitigated.

By: jasjfarrell

jasjfarrell — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:48:24 +0000

How do idiots like Hinchy keep getting reelected? What’s with New York anyway?

Oh yeah, I forgot, ACORN.