Sanford Faces 37 Charges For Breaking “Ethics Laws”

November 23rd, 2009 (9) Posted By Erik Wong.

mark-sanford2

COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) – Gov. Mark Sanford is accused of breaking 37 ethics laws regarding campaign finances and travel, including using taxpayer money for high-priced airplane tickets that took him around the world and to Argentina for a rendezvous with the woman he once called his “soul mate.”

The governor’s attorney said he looks forward to answering the “technical questions” regarding Sanford’s travel and finances at a State Ethics Commission hearing early next year. Details of the civil charges were released Monday and carry a maximum $74,000 in fines.

They came after a three-month investigation by the panel and could be pivotal in a push by some South Carolina lawmakers to remove the Republican governor from office before his second and final term expires in January 2011. The state attorney general is deciding whether Sanford would face any criminal charges.

The civil charges include 18 instances in which Sanford is accused of improperly buying first- and business-class airline tickets, violating state law requiring lowest-cost travel; nine times of improperly using state-owned aircraft for travel to political and personal events, including a stop at a discount hair salon; and 10 times he improperly reimbursed himself with campaign cash.

Herb Hayden, executive director of the commission, said he could not recall another governor facing this number of charges in the past 25 years.

Sanford has been under scrutiny since he vanished for five days over the summer, reappearing to tearfully admit to an extramarital affair with the Argentine woman. The travel allegations were uncovered in a series of Associated Press investigations. Some of the allegations about his use of campaign funds were revealed by The State newspaper in Columbia.

“We are confident that we will be able to address each of these questions, none of which constitutes findings of guilt and none of which we believe rise anywhere near to the traditional standard of impeachment,” Sanford attorney Butch Bowers said Monday.

The ethic commission’s investigative report shows it reviewed 668 flights on state-owned planes, 12 overseas trips on commercial planes and 25 reimbursements to Sanford and his wife using more than $10,800 in campaign money.

Each of the counts claims Sanford used his office for personal financial gain.

The report also shows the commission questioned 61 previously undisclosed flights on privately owned aircraft but did not issues charges after Sanford reported them while the investigation was ongoing.

Among the mistakes the ethics commission says it found:

—Approval of the purchase of four first- and business-class commercial airline tickets for a June 2008 trip during which he met with his mistress in Argentina.

—Personal use of state-owned aircraft for trips such as the birthday party of a campaign contributor in Aiken, and flying from Myrtle Beach to Columbia for a “personal event,” including a haircut.

—Reimbursing himself nearly $3,000 using campaign contributions, including about $900 for expenses to attend a Republican Governors Association meeting in Miami and a hunting trip in Dublin, Ireland, several days later.

Still, even several lawmakers who have called for Sanford to step down said it was unclear whether the accusations would be weighty enough to propel an impeachment measure.

“If it’s relatively minor ethics violations, I don’t believe there will be sentiment there to remove the governor,” said House Majority Leader Kenny Bingham, R-Cayce.

For months, Sanford has insisted he did nothing wrong and served as a better steward of the taxpayer dollar than his predecessors.

But four GOP lawmakers already have filed a resolution that would force Sanford from office because of “dereliction of duty,” and the travel allegations play no part in that move. Their measure deals solely with Sanford’s absence from the state, when he led his staff to believe he was hiking the Appalachian Trail while he was in Argentina.

A committee considering that measure has an initial meeting set for Tuesday.

Sanford has brushed off repeated calls from his own party to step down and in the past month scored a political victory by helping land a Boeing Co. assembly plant that is expected to bring thousands of jobs to North Charleston.

Meanwhile, the first lady and their four sons moved out of the governor’s mansion. While the Sanfords have said they were trying to reconcile, Jenny Sanford more recently has described the two as separated. She is writing a book about it.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • Tellicorick

    Do the right thing and resign your stupid ass right now!

    • SgtJenz

      :beer:

    • Bobby E

      I think there is an unwritten rule for politicians that they have to amass a certain number of transgressions before there is ever a thought of them being corrupt … i.e., he hasn’t reached his ‘quota’ yet. And (see Jim D comment below), what he has amassed so far wouldn’t qualify him to be a Democrat.

  • YERMOM

    this asshole should have stepped down a long time ago.

  • http://deleted Jim D

    If he was smart he would just switch to the democrat party then he would be a hero a stud,forgiven and rewarded.I guess he’s just not a good politition. :lol:

    • Bob P

      what ever happened to Charlie Rangel or Harry Rieds or Nasty pelosi or Barbra Boxers ethics violations?

  • mike3481

    His “little brain” got him in big trouble.

    :mrgreen:

  • MIDTN

    For God’s sake SC get rid of this nut job.

    Does EVERYTHING here in the South have to move at a damn snails pace?

    You’d think it was Obie trying to decide about the troops and Afghanistan.

    Can his ass now!

  • copperpeony

    Ethics violation???? Here is an ethics violation:

    This morning’s news on Fox reported that 5 Navy Seals are facing court marshal because the terrorist they arrested claims he got hit in the face and is screaming abuse charges. Never mind that this terrorist was the leader that mutilated 3 of our men, burned them and hung their bodies from a bridge in Falusia.

    What kind of message does this send to our soldiers? What kind of message does this send to the terrorists? If I would’ve caught this man, he would’ve been hanging from that same bridge, in the same condition.

    This is an outrage and unfreakingbelievable!! The terrorists are getting citizen’s rights and our military is being castigated by this terrorist loving administration. ENOUGH